RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

User avatar
LionelHutzJD
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby LionelHutzJD » Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:51 pm

So many MP questions that for the first time they were actually a little challenging.

pwnyc127
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:54 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby pwnyc127 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:52 pm

LR was tough this time around, a couple of really tricky necessary assumptions with convoluted language (i'm hoping that section was experimental)...and a wierd game with voicemails and websites, seriously who advertises with voicemails anyway? The girl behind me was crying with her head in her hands after the test, guess nobody told her she can cancel...

User avatar
teiswei
Posts: 695
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby teiswei » Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:53 pm

pwnyc127 wrote:LR was tough this time around, a couple of really tricky necessary assumptions with convoluted language (i'm hoping that section was experimental)...and a wierd game with voicemails and websites, seriously who advertises with voicemails anyway? The girl behind me was crying with her head in her hands after the test, guess nobody told her she can cancel...


Advertise? I thought it was about scheduling?

e_mac7
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:26 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby e_mac7 » Sun Dec 02, 2012 12:54 am

elliottwarner wrote:25, 26 were real. I had 2 RC, was Mexican Folk Music and Pin Theory/ Adam smith real?


so the last LR section was that real or not? I can't remember if it had 25 or 26 but it didn't look like anything I'd practiced. I hope it was exp.

User avatar
teiswei
Posts: 695
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby teiswei » Sun Dec 02, 2012 1:30 am

e_mac7 wrote:
elliottwarner wrote:25, 26 were real. I had 2 RC, was Mexican Folk Music and Pin Theory/ Adam smith real?


so the last LR section was that real or not? I can't remember if it had 25 or 26 but it didn't look like anything I'd practiced. I hope it was exp.


Probably real... They threw in some new question wording. Just convoluted crap.

User avatar
Funkycrime
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:31 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby Funkycrime » Sun Dec 02, 2012 1:40 am

What do you guys mean by 1-1? Not familiar with this designation.

User avatar
LionelHutzJD
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby LionelHutzJD » Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:19 am

I'm drunk. I bombed RC. WHYYYY. Fuck my stupid life.

e_mac7
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:26 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby e_mac7 » Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:58 am

teiswei wrote:
e_mac7 wrote:
elliottwarner wrote:25, 26 were real. I had 2 RC, was Mexican Folk Music and Pin Theory/ Adam smith real?


so the last LR section was that real or not? I can't remember if it had 25 or 26 but it didn't look like anything I'd practiced. I hope it was exp.


Probably real... They threw in some new question wording. Just convoluted crap.


Well here's to hoping for the best. Good luck everyone!

MissJenna
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 11:18 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby MissJenna » Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:06 am

cynthiad wrote:
MissJenna wrote:Can someone please tell me what type of game the 3rd one was? I couldn't believe how lost I was.:((((( Given how much it stressed me out....I can't even remember details of it!! Arghhhh!!! I was something 1 day, 2 days and 3 days.


voicemail? idk if it was a type. I've never seen one like it.


I can't remember but I do recall it having like 3 letters too and then the days thing.

URMLAW
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:24 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby URMLAW » Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:59 am

Hey guys, for those of you that took october's LSAT, how did this test felt?

gerrand
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby gerrand » Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:26 am

Hello,

I'm pretty sure my FIRST LR was experimental (section 2).

It had two questions that each shared the same prompt and only had 24 questions.
AND
Can anyone confirm this?
It had one question that was WORD FOR WORD (97% sure) the same as a question from a previously adminstered test. It also, if I'm right, had the same answer (obviously?).

User avatar
chem!
Posts: 9380
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:03 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby chem! » Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:28 am

gerrand wrote:Hello,

I'm pretty sure my FIRST LR was experimental (section 2).

It had two questions that each shared the same prompt and only had 24 questions.
AND
Can anyone confirm this?
It had one question that was WORD FOR WORD (97% sure) the same as a question from a previously adminstered test. It also, if I'm right, had the same answer (obviously?).


I didn't have two questions that shared a prompt and I have no idea about the second situation.

mpd1690
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:32 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby mpd1690 » Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:47 am

.
Last edited by mpd1690 on Sun Sep 27, 2015 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

Goodman
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:06 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby Goodman » Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:19 pm

Has anyone made any progress figuring out which section was experimental? I had 25-26-25 and do not recall any 90s-style stimuli with two questions. I know the one with 26 questions was scored (all test takers had a section with 26 questions) but have no clue about the others. Thanks!

Spartan_Alum_12
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:14 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby Spartan_Alum_12 » Mon Dec 03, 2012 5:05 pm

Goodman wrote:Has anyone made any progress figuring out which section was experimental? I had 25-26-25 and do not recall any 90s-style stimuli with two questions. I know the one with 26 questions was scored (all test takers had a section with 26 questions) but have no clue about the others. Thanks!


I had 26-26-25. One thing I do remember is having an evaluate the argument question on the last two LR sections, didn't have one on the first.

WallstreetRebel
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:44 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby WallstreetRebel » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:52 pm

I also had this test order. Can someone please tell me the theme of each Logic Game? I know the first had to do with morning/night, but can't remember the rest. I'm trying to look back over my performance, but my lack of memory is not helping.

Goodman
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:06 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby Goodman » Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:19 pm

WallstreetRebel wrote:I also had this test order. Can someone please tell me the theme of each Logic Game? I know the first had to do with morning/night, but can't remember the rest. I'm trying to look back over my performance, but my lack of memory is not helping.


3rd involved voice mails and web advertisements.

Spartan_Alum_12 wrote:
Goodman wrote:Has anyone made any progress figuring out which section was experimental? I had 25-26-25 and do not recall any 90s-style stimuli with two questions. I know the one with 26 questions was scored (all test takers had a section with 26 questions) but have no clue about the others. Thanks!


I had 26-26-25. One thing I do remember is having an evaluate the argument question on the last two LR sections, didn't have one on the first.


I can't recall the placement of any of the question types or subjects. Nerves made it all a blur. Guess I won't know till the scores are released....

User avatar
LionelHutzJD
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby LionelHutzJD » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:59 am

I do remember an evaluate the argument question regarding the ugly breed of dog "cocker spaniel" pretty sure I got that right as I remember it clearly (even the answer choice)

User avatar
simplycatalina
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby simplycatalina » Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:48 pm

I had 26-26-25 LR. For anyone who had this order, does anyone remember a lot of parallel flaw questions in one section? (Like a ridiculous amount--perhaps as many as 4-5). That's all I remember but everything is a blur. I believe my first 26 question section was the experimental, but I'm not sure. I also remember a question about poodles, one about asteroids, blinds/curtains, furry fish, and something about vitamin c and cancer

User avatar
chem!
Posts: 9380
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:03 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby chem! » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:24 pm

There was definitely an abundance of parallel questions in one section.

mawata
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 5:12 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby mawata » Wed Dec 05, 2012 5:19 pm

cbarlow1016 wrote:I had 26-26-25 LR. For anyone who had this order, does anyone remember a lot of parallel flaw questions in one section? (Like a ridiculous amount--perhaps as many as 4-5). That's all I remember but everything is a blur. I believe my first 26 question section was the experimental, but I'm not sure. I also remember a question about poodles, one about asteroids, blinds/curtains, furry fish, and something about vitamin c and cancer


I think I had this setup too, although my test went LG LR LR RC LR. My first section had a lot of convoluted language that wasn't consistent with what I'd seen before, which led me to believe it might be the experimental (I hope. The last time I thought this way on the LSAT I turned out to be right). My second LR section seemed easy-standard and my last LR section seemed standard. Not knowing which section didn't count is freaking me out though, because I bombed that first LR section so hard. Also I remember all of the questions you named except for the blinds and curtains, but I think I might just be forgetting that one.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 9 guests