RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

User avatar
teiswei
Posts: 695
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm

RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby teiswei » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:53 pm

LRs were 24, 26, an 25 Qs respectively. Which was experimental? Thanks!

Spartan_Alum_12
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:14 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby Spartan_Alum_12 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:59 pm

teiswei wrote:LRs were 24, 26, an 25 Qs respectively. Which was experimental? Thanks!


I believe they were 26 - 26 - 25???

elliottwarner
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:15 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby elliottwarner » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:00 pm

25, 26 were real. I had 2 RC, was Mexican Folk Music and Pin Theory/ Adam smith real?

vulpixie
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:41 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby vulpixie » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:02 pm

Yeah, Smith and Folk Music was real.

Spartan_Alum_12
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:14 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby Spartan_Alum_12 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:02 pm

elliottwarner wrote:25, 26 were real. I had 2 RC, was Mexican Folk Music and Pin Theory/ Adam smith real?


Yes, that RC was real.

Yumizzz
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:48 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby Yumizzz » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:52 pm

I got 25-26-25... Not sure which one of the 25 sections is experimental... Anyone with any ideas about this?

Spartan_Alum_12
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:14 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby Spartan_Alum_12 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:54 pm

Yumizzz wrote:I got 25-26-25... Not sure which one of the 25 sections is experimental... Anyone with any ideas about this?


Wow, how many different LR experimental sections can there be?

framboozer
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:38 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby framboozer » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:55 pm

Yumizzz wrote:I got 25-26-25... Not sure which one of the 25 sections is experimental... Anyone with any ideas about this?


I had that too. I think the first one was experimental but they all blended together for me honestly.

Yumizzz
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:48 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby Yumizzz » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:58 pm

framboozer wrote:
Yumizzz wrote:I got 25-26-25... Not sure which one of the 25 sections is experimental... Anyone with any ideas about this?


I had that too. I think the first one was experimental but they all blended together for me honestly.


I expected so, since the third one seemed to me pretty easy...

User avatar
teiswei
Posts: 695
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby teiswei » Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:40 pm

Yumizzz wrote:
framboozer wrote:
Yumizzz wrote:I got 25-26-25... Not sure which one of the 25 sections is experimental... Anyone with any ideas about this?


I had that too. I think the first one was experimental but they all blended together for me honestly.


I expected so, since the third one seemed to me pretty easy...


Wow, I've never heard of two different experimental sections for the same type.

MissJenna
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 11:18 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby MissJenna » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:09 pm

Can someone please tell me what type of game the 3rd one was? I couldn't believe how lost I was.:((((( Given how much it stressed me out....I can't even remember details of it!! Arghhhh!!! I was something 1 day, 2 days and 3 days.

User avatar
red52
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:28 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby red52 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:23 pm

the exp was the one with the 90's style questioning (IE: passage then Q's 3-4)


btw that section was hard as hell... im so glad it was exp. the RC was rather hard too..... i honest dont know how i did... its going to literally be up to my LR's to determine my score.

cynthiad
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:16 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby cynthiad » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:29 pm

MissJenna wrote:Can someone please tell me what type of game the 3rd one was? I couldn't believe how lost I was.:((((( Given how much it stressed me out....I can't even remember details of it!! Arghhhh!!! I was something 1 day, 2 days and 3 days.


voicemail? idk if it was a type. I've never seen one like it.

corcorty
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:11 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby corcorty » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:41 pm

USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST

User avatar
LionelHutzJD
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby LionelHutzJD » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:45 pm

I had the same setup and definitely did not have an LR with a two question stimulus.

User avatar
teiswei
Posts: 695
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby teiswei » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:46 pm

USER WAS BANNED FOR ANOTHER POST, BUT IS AN IDIOT AND WOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED FOR THIS ONE TOO

User avatar
LionelHutzJD
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby LionelHutzJD » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:46 pm

I really feel like I did well on LR but then again I really don't know.

User avatar
red52
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:28 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby red52 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:50 pm

LionelHutzJD wrote:I really feel like I did well on LR but then again I really don't know.



lol this^^ there were so many MP questions...

User avatar
teiswei
Posts: 695
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby teiswei » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:58 pm

red52 wrote:
LionelHutzJD wrote:I really feel like I did well on LR but then again I really don't know.



lol this^^ there were so many MP questions...


I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?

User avatar
red52
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:28 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby red52 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:00 pm

teiswei wrote:
red52 wrote:
LionelHutzJD wrote:I really feel like I did well on LR but then again I really don't know.



lol this^^ there were so many MP questions...


I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?


no.... i was preoccupied with my exp section.... so hard... i hard exp LR and i literally felt like they put every single parallel/flawed similar reasoning question in the book in that section.... im so glad its not scored otherwise id be canceling right about now.

corcorty
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:11 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby corcorty » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:07 pm

red52 wrote:
teiswei wrote:
red52 wrote:
LionelHutzJD wrote:I really feel like I did well on LR but then again I really don't know.



lol this^^ there were so many MP questions...


I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?


no.... i was preoccupied with my exp section.... so hard... i hard exp LR and i literally felt like they put every single parallel/flawed similar reasoning question in the book in that section.... im so glad its not scored otherwise id be canceling right about now.

Had to have been at least 6 in that section. I hate parallel flaw questions so much.

User avatar
red52
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:28 am

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby red52 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:21 pm

corcorty wrote:I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?




i had to guess on the last 3.. i was freaking out after this section and thought about cancelling... im thanking the stars it was experimental... still though it left a terrible taste in my mouth to the point where i feel like i did bad even though i may have done ok.

Spartan_Alum_12
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:14 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby Spartan_Alum_12 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:33 pm

red52 wrote:
corcorty wrote:I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?




i had to guess on the last 3.. i was freaking out after this section and thought about cancelling... im thanking the stars it was experimental... still though it left a terrible taste in my mouth to the point where i feel like i did bad even though i may have done ok.


I still don't know which LR was experimental for me. I didn't have any stimulus with two questions, I'm 90% sure at least.
Last edited by Spartan_Alum_12 on Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
teiswei
Posts: 695
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby teiswei » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:33 pm

red52 wrote:
corcorty wrote:I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?




i had to guess on the last 3.. i was freaking out after this section and thought about cancelling... im thanking the stars it was experimental... still though it left a terrible taste in my mouth to the point where i feel like i did bad even though i may have done ok.


That's the worst part. One bad section can kill your confidence and impact the rest of your test. The best thing to hope for is that it's your last section and it kills your writing sample. I am still annoyed that I had to do it. I feel like it is going to get removed as soon as I'm done with the LSAT.

corcorty
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:11 pm

Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG

Postby corcorty » Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:48 pm

teiswei wrote:
corcorty wrote:Was it a 1-1 Sequencing, doubling the entities?
Like everyone else, got through the first two LGs in 10 minutes, starting doing diagram for 3rd, moved on to 4th, which took 15 minutes. Going back to the third to come to the realization it would have been much easier diagrammed as a 1-1. Hopefully I got through it fine.

Hearing the exp. was the LR with a prompt for two questions. My mind's still so jumbled I don't know if that's a good or bad thing though.


I played it as a grouping game with 2 sides. It was easy, I thought, but I'm pretty good at games. It took a couple deductions but doable in 7-8 minutes.


I hear ya, games is my reliable section too. I went with it as a grouping question but realized for me it made more sense to make it a 1-1.

Overall, I feel ten times better than after October. Hope everyone else did well.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Clyde Frog, curry4bfast, Google [Bot], theboringest and 6 guests