LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Will_Imake_it
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 10:12 pm

LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby Will_Imake_it » Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:49 pm

was third RC exp?

User avatar
bitsy
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:06 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby bitsy » Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:50 pm

give us the topics, babycakes

User avatar
CyanIdes Of March
Posts: 743
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby CyanIdes Of March » Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:59 pm

Can we post about the topics without getting in trouble with LSAC? There's some substantial links between me and this account so I have to be extra careful :| .

User avatar
bitsy
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:06 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby bitsy » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:01 pm

pretty sure that's alright, since weve splashed them all over the waiting thread.

User avatar
CyanIdes Of March
Posts: 743
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby CyanIdes Of March » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:05 pm

*Edited because I'm paranoid (but I have decent reason to be unfortunately).
Last edited by CyanIdes Of March on Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
LionelHutzJD
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby LionelHutzJD » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:08 pm

Corridos was the real section. And I completely bombed it.

User avatar
bitsy
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:06 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby bitsy » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:08 pm

fourth was real, then.

i think the s4p3 was on enforcement of laws and a water bill tax solution

User avatar
carboncopyx
Posts: 671
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby carboncopyx » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:09 pm

Cyanides, I think you're right. Except the comparative in Section 4 was about prosecutorial discretion/water bills. And I think that was the real one.

trildog1091
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:03 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby trildog1091 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:11 pm

Reading comp made me cry

User avatar
carboncopyx
Posts: 671
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby carboncopyx » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:12 pm

trildog1091 wrote:Reading comp made me cry


Don't cryyyy. :( (And yes, I might be through with half a bottle of wine by now.)

User avatar
CyanIdes Of March
Posts: 743
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby CyanIdes Of March » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:20 pm

Wow. Someone just messaged me saying that the thread has been logged and that action may be taken? I sure hope it's someone trolling me (which would be the cruelest troll ever) but seriously...

Will_Imake_it
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 10:12 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby Will_Imake_it » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:24 pm

i dont even remember the topics on the third RC, Because I was blank.. I hope the second RC was real.. isn't it suppose to be that the first three section always has the experimental?

KingsBench
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2011 1:21 am

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby KingsBench » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:56 pm

I got thrown off by having LG first, I'm pretty sure I bombed the section - got thrown off by the 3rd game. And I had this inkling that the first RC experimental - it seemed too easy. The second RC felt much harder overall.

User avatar
Scotchandsoda
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:09 am

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby Scotchandsoda » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:58 pm

The passage with Corrido was the real one.

Will_Imake_it
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 10:12 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby Will_Imake_it » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:59 pm

KingsBench wrote:I got thrown off by having LG first, I'm pretty sure I bombed the section - got thrown off by the 3rd game. And I had this inkling that the first RC experimental - it seemed too easy. The second RC felt much harder overall.


game with articles was real as I have read so far.

droppingby
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:41 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby droppingby » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:16 pm

please say the shaman/dualities one was the dummy, anyone please.

User avatar
happyshapy
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:41 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby happyshapy » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:36 pm

droppingby wrote:please say the shaman/dualities one was the dummy, anyone please.


I don't remember that. The real one was mexican boarder lit/insects, plants/econ theory/waterbills

User avatar
99.9luft
Posts: 1244
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby 99.9luft » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:45 pm

LionelHutzJD wrote:Corridos was the real section. And I completely bombed it.


fuck, seriously? but i loved Descartes so much....

californiauser
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby californiauser » Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:08 pm

The first LR killed me. I have no idea why. I felt like the games were the easiest complete section i've ever seen.

I had to guess on 4 LR questions when I usually finish with time, fuck.

Anyone else think LR1 was exceptionally hard or is it just me?

User avatar
Funkycrime
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:31 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby Funkycrime » Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:12 pm

LR one was definitely harder than two, but still in the realm of average I would say. The 1st RC went so well, I was pretty pissed when I turned the page after the break to find another.

User avatar
happyshapy
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:41 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby happyshapy » Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:44 pm

Funkycrime wrote:LR one was definitely harder than two, but still in the realm of average I would say. The 1st RC went so well, I was pretty pissed when I turned the page after the break to find another.


same. I had a hard time finding my focus after that. The econ passage I found difficult because I really wasn't paying enough attention to understand it. Mex boarders and incests were pretty good, and the water bills was really easy, I just didn't enough time to answer with confidence.

I really have zero clue how I did. Anywhere from a 160 to 170.

User avatar
papercut
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:48 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby papercut » Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:50 pm

Hi all,

Do any of you guys (that had only real LRs) remember having a question about believing a report?

californiauser
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby californiauser » Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:51 pm

papercut wrote:Hi all,

Do any of you guys (that had only real LRs) remember having a question about believing a report?


Is that all you can remember about it? I'm fairly confident I can remember any question I had if you give me a little more to work with.

Cellar-door
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:33 pm

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby Cellar-door » Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:55 pm

californiauser wrote:
papercut wrote:Hi all,

Do any of you guys (that had only real LRs) remember having a question about believing a report?


Is that all you can remember about it? I'm fairly confident I can remember any question I had if you give me a little more to work with.


I think they mean the Kids TV versus Museums question.

californiauser
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Postby californiauser » Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:56 pm

Cellar-door wrote:
californiauser wrote:
papercut wrote:Hi all,

Do any of you guys (that had only real LRs) remember having a question about believing a report?


Is that all you can remember about it? I'm fairly confident I can remember any question I had if you give me a little more to work with.


I think they mean the Kids TV versus Museums question.


Definitely had that one.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], cctv, LewD33, PresidentIJohnson, SweetTort, Tazewell, Yahoo [Bot] and 9 guests