Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar

Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:13 pm


Postby sdwarrior403 » Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:00 am

How is C correct? Isn't the claim addressed by talking about the attempt of careful avoidance?

Of course, the response to the claim fails to remove all doubt as to whether his pesticide use is affecting things.

User avatar

Posts: 3637
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm

Re: 67-4-21

Postby ScottRiqui » Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:04 am

She's claiming that his pesticides are spreading to her farm via runoff water, and he's claiming she's wrong (which would mean that his pesticides are NOT spreading to her farm via runoff water). But neither of his subsequent statements (that he's using organic pesticides or that he's careful to only spray on his own land) refute her claim at all. She's not claiming that his pesticides are harmful, and she's not accusing him of spraying on her land. She's saying that the pesticides are spreading to her land via runoff water, not as a result of sloppy spraying on his part.

So answer C is correct - he's done nothing at all to address her claim.

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests