Page 4 of 4

Re: Are we due for another killer LG?

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:05 pm
by dec12
Wormfather wrote:
dec12 wrote:what's all this crap about 'zones'? is it a type of game or a specific game? should i care about zones? is it likely to show up on tomorrow's test?
Zones was the fourth game in October. It is in part why the retaker's thread exists. No, you will not see zones tomorrow. But you should see zones. It is the perfect example of why you should expect anything on gameday. Even games that are unusual and shittily worded.
thanks for the quick reply. sigh, i hope the difficulty of the october LG means that it won't be as hard tomorrow.

Re: Are we due for another killer LG?

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:28 pm
by boblawlob
Wormfather wrote:Oct games were also shitty because the first game threw a list of names at you that were meant to be the base not the thing ordered.
It was a weird, 2 layered grouping game that had no order; so there was no method to the madness....just all madness.

Re: Are we due for another killer LG?

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:04 pm
by kckool7
Wormfather wrote:Match these people to these majors to these speeches....and hurry up, I've got a surprise for you for the fourth game.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
If I ever end up on a zoning board, I may have a nervous breakdown.

Re: Are we due for another killer LG?

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:08 pm
by SumStalwart
I can't remember if it was you, Worm, who talked about the RC nature of Zones... But, the AR section should not test you on that sort of comprehension! I can't remember which question... 21? But the critical reading involved was special. Since that point, I have been paying a lot more attention to the phrasing of the AR questions.

Re: Are we due for another killer LG?

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:10 pm
by GGforLSAT
I bet somewhere on the test, there is going to be a question or passage about zones and subzones, just for the people with Oct 6 PTSD.

Re: Are we due for another killer LG?

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:51 pm
by SumStalwart
GGforLSAT wrote:I bet somewhere on the test, there is going to be a question or passage about zones and subzones, just for the people with Oct 6 PTSD.
That's just mean.

The thing that kills me is that it wasn't the logic game section that did me in... it was !KAHN! Oops, I mean !Kung.

Re: Are we due for another killer LG?

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 4:01 pm
by gguuueessttt
GGforLSAT wrote:I bet somewhere on the test, there is going to be a question or passage about zones and subzones, just for the people with Oct 6 PTSD.
Image

Re: Are we due for another killer LG?

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 4:04 pm
by bananapudding88
gguuueessttt wrote:
GGforLSAT wrote:I bet somewhere on the test, there is going to be a question or passage about zones and subzones, just for the people with Oct 6 PTSD.
Image
This :lol:

Re: Are we due for another killer LG?

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 4:49 pm
by willwash
Wormfather wrote:
dec12 wrote:what's all this crap about 'zones'? is it a type of game or a specific game? should i care about zones? is it likely to show up on tomorrow's test?
Zones was the fourth game in October. It is in part why the retaker's thread exists. No, you will not see zones tomorrow. But you should see zones. It is the perfect example of why you should expect anything on gameday. Even games that are unusual and shittily worded.
Word of the day= shittily. +1