bdeans91 wrote:I am going to start the hardcore PT-ing in April. Essentially April 1st.
What should I go for: mass # of PTs or quality of PTs?
For instance, I could go PT every 2nd or 3rd day - PTs on Monday, Review Tues/Wed, PT Thurs, Review Fri, PT Sat, Review Sun.... taking only 1 day to review PTs I feel good about, and 2 days for ones I don't... then I could get 25-30 PTs done by test day.
Or I could go for quality of PTs, and always do: Monday PT, 2 days review, Thursday PT, 2 days review, day off or comparison of the PTs and weak point analysis. This would render 20 total PTs if I adhered to it PERFECTLY.
So I can sacrifice maybe a day of review on 5-10 of my PTs, but get the reference of 5-10 more that way. Is this a good move? What do you guys recommend with your experience?
Quality! See what works for you. I was doing too many PT's and not enough review, and saw a much smaller score improvement than when I really sat down with each PT for a while and extensively went over every question I got wrong or got correct but with difficulty. For me, when I am done reviewing, I want to know each PT backwards and forwards (and for questions I don't understand the answer to, I usually ask someone for help... about to post one on here actually from #52).