Daily_Double wrote:Kool-Aid wrote:weathercoins wrote:PT 52
LR1: -1 (#16)
LG: -2 (#3, 17)
LR2: -3 (16,17,25)
93/99 raw, 174 scaled
Have not yet reviewed, but I'm actually really confused. The LG must have been careless errors, and this hasn't happened in a while. Yet my best RC ever before this was -4, so I'm so pumped by the RC. I think I did this PT like a year and a half ago, so not sure how accurate the score is.
Good job weather! I keep missing a couple on LG, careless errors as well. I'd die to go -0 on RC, I don't think I've ever went less than -2.
The things I would do to go -0 on RC on June 10, 2013... It's bad. And awesome work weathercoins.
Haha, thanks guys. Yeah, same with me about the -0 on RC. This feels nice but really not getting my hopes up.