PT 65 Section 4 #25

User avatar
sdwarrior403
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:13 pm

PT 65 Section 4 #25

Postby sdwarrior403 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:03 pm

We know that Lutsina believes futuristic scientific novels envisage radically new social arrangments. This was part of the reasoning used to state that these novels have more promise. So Lutsina would definitely disagree with D. Lutsina believes that these novels are doing those things. Answer D is stating that these novels are not doing those things.

On the other hand, Priscilla would agree with D. This was the entire point of her argument. This is a bad thing with these novels and why the most effective way of social criticism is through something else.

Help with this one.

natashka85
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm

Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25

Postby natashka85 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

sdwarrior403 wrote:We know that Lutsina believes futuristic scientific novels envisage radically new social arrangments. This was part of the reasoning used to state that these novels have more promise. So Lutsina would definitely disagree with D. Lutsina believes that these novels are doing those things. Answer D is stating that these novels are not doing those things.

On the other hand, Priscilla would agree with D. This was the entire point of her argument. This is a bad thing with these novels and why the most effective way of social criticism is through something else.

Help with this one.

Well C is the right answer,cause they both talk about it,Lustina saysFuturistic is better than the conventional,
Priscilla says no conventional is the best one that means its better than the futuristic.
D is wrong cause only P mentions that,L mentions new social arrangements but not technologies ,not there,if u can see that.

User avatar
sdwarrior403
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:13 pm

Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25

Postby sdwarrior403 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:27 pm

natashka85 wrote:D is wrong cause only P mentions that,L mentions new social arrangements but not technologies ,not there,if u can see that.

It is not necessary for Lutsina to mention technologies. Look at what the answer choice is saying. Envisaging X rather than Y. We know that Lutsina states that the envisaging of Y is occurring in these novels. So this answer choice is stating that envisaging of Y is not occurring. This is something that Lutsina would diagree with. The lack of mention of technologies is not an issue.

natashka85
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm

Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25

Postby natashka85 » Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:13 am

sdwarrior403 wrote:
natashka85 wrote:D is wrong cause only P mentions that,L mentions new social arrangements but not technologies ,not there,if u can see that.

It is not necessary for Lutsina to mention technologies. Look at what the answer choice is saying. Envisaging X rather than Y. We know that Lutsina states that the envisaging of Y is occurring in these novels. So this answer choice is stating that envisaging of Y is not occurring. This is something that Lutsina would diagree with. The lack of mention of technologies is not an issue.

Yea ,but Lustina doesn`t say technologies rather than social arrangement,she doesnt care about technologies also she doesnt mention about shortcoming that`s sth that only P discusses.

User avatar
sdwarrior403
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:13 pm

Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25

Postby sdwarrior403 » Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:28 am

natashka85 wrote:
sdwarrior403 wrote:
natashka85 wrote:D is wrong cause only P mentions that,L mentions new social arrangements but not technologies ,not there,if u can see that.

It is not necessary for Lutsina to mention technologies. Look at what the answer choice is saying. Envisaging X rather than Y. We know that Lutsina states that the envisaging of Y is occurring in these novels. So this answer choice is stating that envisaging of Y is not occurring. This is something that Lutsina would diagree with. The lack of mention of technologies is not an issue.

Yea ,but Lustina doesn`t say technologies rather than social arrangement,she doesnt care about technologies also she doesnt mention about shortcoming that`s sth that only P discusses.

Do you agree or disagree that answer choice D implies that envisaging of new social arrangements is not occurring in the futuristic science novels?

Do you agree or disagree that Lutsina believes that futuristic science novels envisage new social arrangements?

natashka85
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm

Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25

Postby natashka85 » Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:01 am

sdwarrior403 wrote:
natashka85 wrote:
sdwarrior403 wrote:
natashka85 wrote:D is wrong cause only P mentions that,L mentions new social arrangements but not technologies ,not there,if u can see that.

It is not necessary for Lutsina to mention technologies. Look at what the answer choice is saying. Envisaging X rather than Y. We know that Lutsina states that the envisaging of Y is occurring in these novels. So this answer choice is stating that envisaging of Y is not occurring. This is something that Lutsina would diagree with. The lack of mention of technologies is not an issue.

Yea ,but Lustina doesn`t say technologies rather than social arrangement,she doesnt care about technologies also she doesnt mention about shortcoming that`s sth that only P discusses.

Do you agree or disagree that answer choice D implies that envisaging of new social arrangements is not occurring in the futuristic science novels?

Do you agree or disagree that Lutsina believes that futuristic science novels envisage new social arrangements?[/quot
D is an irrelevant answer choice ,I dont know how u look at it but C is obviously right.

natashka85
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm

Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25

Postby natashka85 » Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:05 am

U are going too far with your interpretation in the Lsat ,u are not allowed to do that,C is clearly right and D is irrelevant to one of the guys.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexandros, Yahoo [Bot] and 9 guests