4 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:01 am
Hey guys, I'm in need of some advice on the LR section. I drilled PT's 10-20 and usually missed 2-4 each LR section. Just for kicks I drilled PT 60 and probably missed around 9-10 on the first LR section. I know the test changes significantly but is this just a fluke in the number of questions I'm missing or does the LR section REALLY get that harder? I'm planning on taking the February test. I haven't started drilling the RC section but I've gotten the LG section down pretty well..can I still be in shape, taking in account what PT 60 might indicate? I've gone through the PS Bibles and Manhattan books. Also have drilled with Cambridge worksheets. Thanks!
- Posts: 3091
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:05 pm
inevitable510 wrote: I know the test changes significantly but is this just a fluke in the number of questions I'm missing or does the LR section REALLY get that harder?
The test does not change significantly. They get a little more sophisticated with their language, and they're a little more precise with their wording. However, the logic is the same, and the question types are the same.
If you are used to the 'old' LSATs, then changing from #20 to #60 can result in a bit of a shock the first time. Your brain is used to a certain pattern on the exam that's shifted since the 90s. However, it shouldn't take too long for you to adjust to the new ones, as the logic/question types (as stated above) are the same. So think of the new LSATs as a cold pool - you faced the shock when you jumped right in. But now that you're in, it should feel a lot better. I'd expect you to take 1-2 more tests/sections to adjust, and then see a reversion to your old levels of accuracy.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests