I find the answer for this one to be nonsense.
I picked D and I do not see how the fact that "there is no other evidence that these foreign companies induced the change" can become a premise for the principle, part of which states that "interests of the person or group played a role in bringing about the change"
Again, I find the answer for this one to be nonsense.
Thanks for reading.
Will be looking forward to get some replies.
Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
2 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 16 guests