February 2013 LSAT Study Group Forum
- Ambitious1
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:38 pm
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
I suppose I'll be the first to chime in. I thought LG was pretty easy, LR was harder than the last few tests, and RC was awful.
really hope lr#1 is the experimental, that fucking sucked.
really hope lr#1 is the experimental, that fucking sucked.
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 6&t=204017Ambitious1 wrote:I suppose I'll be the first to chime in. I thought LG was pretty easy, LR was harder than the last few tests, and RC was awful.
really hope lr#1 is the experimental, that fucking sucked.
- dusters
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:12 pm
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
Well I got what I wanted but I'm not real confident still...ws81086n wrote:I'll second that. We're overdue for a binary grouping, for sure.dusters wrote:Praying for relative ordering and conditional grouping games come Saturday
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
Lol, indeed. I am killing myself thinking about that last game. Didn't bomb it or anything, but I am really wondering if the Eureka moments I had within the last 90 seconds for two of the questions were justified or not. Nothing to do but wait now.dusters wrote:Well I got what I wanted but I'm not real confident still...ws81086n wrote:I'll second that. We're overdue for a binary grouping, for sure.dusters wrote:Praying for relative ordering and conditional grouping games come Saturday
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
100% in the same boat, but with about 60 seconds left.ws81086n wrote:Lol, indeed. I am killing myself thinking about that last game. Didn't bomb it or anything, but I am really wondering if the Eureka moments I had within the last 90 seconds for two of the questions were justified or not. Nothing to do but wait now.dusters wrote:Well I got what I wanted but I'm not real confident still...ws81086n wrote:I'll second that. We're overdue for a binary grouping, for sure.dusters wrote:Praying for relative ordering and conditional grouping games come Saturday
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
Now I regret that I didn't take it ,lol ,I knew I wouldn't sleep at night and I withdrew ,but I regret
- dusters
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:12 pm
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
Ditto to that.ws81086n wrote:Lol, indeed. I am killing myself thinking about that last game. Didn't bomb it or anything, but I am really wondering if the Eureka moments I had within the last 90 seconds for two of the questions were justified or not. Nothing to do but wait now.dusters wrote:Well I got what I wanted but I'm not real confident still...ws81086n wrote:I'll second that. We're overdue for a binary grouping, for sure.dusters wrote:Praying for relative ordering and conditional grouping games come Saturday
Wow I did the exact same thing. Good thing first two games were really easy but I'm still unsure of the last one. Did 3 or the questions in the final two minutes
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:56 pm
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
LG, the real one was:
#1: Badges
#2: Semester courses
#3: Romance novels
etc.
Was it just me was LG # 1 (badges) really easy?
And how about that mystrey, tragedy game? That was kinda hard.
#1: Badges
#2: Semester courses
#3: Romance novels
etc.
Was it just me was LG # 1 (badges) really easy?
And how about that mystrey, tragedy game? That was kinda hard.
- eav1277
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
Someone already mentioned but there are a lot more posts in the Feb waiter thread
- Zoomie
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:54 am
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
Yes this. RC was terrible. My proctor decided to clean out her change purse and unwrap her candy during the third passage. I seriously bombed this section.Ambitious1 wrote:I suppose I'll be the first to chime in. I thought LG was pretty easy, LR was harder than the last few tests, and RC was awful.
really hope lr#1 is the experimental, that fucking sucked.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
Whatup Febbers?
- Jcastro1
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:45 pm
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
I got so hammered last night
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:25 am
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
I just have a QUESTION ..... I have already taken the LSAT and received a 168, and then am planning on taking the December LSAT hoping to aim for a 170 plus. If by chance, I take the December LSAt and receive the same 168 score, would it be a bad idea to make another retake next February for the 2013-2014 cycle? If you have taken it previously with a high 160s score, and then say in February you take it again and achieve the desired score, how much weight would committees give the Feb score? Would it even be factored in because its February which is later in the cycles?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 7sage
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:01 am
Re: February 2013 LSAT Study Group
Thanks for the endorsement! The Blind Review Method can be found here: http://7sage.com/blind-review-how-to-re ... ns-part-1/natashka85 wrote:7 sage method for blind review is good too,i dont use his other things but that review video is good too,u may wanna look at that.Instinctive wrote:Can someone direct me to "noodleyone" 's method?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login