Zoning LG Forum

VUSisterRayVU · Post by **VUSisterRayVU** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:55 pm

I would cry.

If I went -2 on games, I think I would cry. I'm not even joking. That would mean I would have reached my PT avg in score most likely. I would be bawling because I could make an objectively poor decision and good to law school. I would be so happy.

boblawlob · Post by **boblawlob** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:12 pm

VUSisterRayVU wrote:I would cry.

If I went -2 on games, I think I would cry. I'm not even joking. That would mean I would have reached my PT avg in score most likely. I would be bawling because I could make an objectively poor decision and good to law school. I would be so happy.

No comprende.

toothbrush · Post by **toothbrush** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:18 pm

boblawlob wrote:
VUSisterRayVU wrote:I would cry.

If I went -2 on games, I think I would cry. I'm not even joking. That would mean I would have reached my PT avg in score most likely. I would be bawling because I could make an objectively poor decision and good to law school. I would be so happy.
No comprende.

think he means go* to law school

as in, if he does well, his pt average, he'd actually go to law school, which many people say isn't a good idea.

Fishdavid4 · Post by **Fishdavid4** » Tue Oct 23, 2012 12:39 pm

seancris · Post by **seancris** » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:15 pm

How did all end up doing on this game? I ended up -2, somehow. Much better than expected.

-3 on the section.

Falls in the "not so bad after all" category for me.

Granfalloon12 · Post by **Granfalloon12** » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:36 pm

I didn't think that the zones game was nearly as bad as everyone was making it out to be, I went -1 on the section and game's were always my weakness (I think I went -5 or -6 on June's test), so that felt great.
It was just super difficult to diagram, but plugging the questions in one-by-one didn't take long at all.

Locke89 · Post by **Locke89** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:16 am

Damn how did you get so fast? Just relentlessly taking LG over and over? Could you tell us what your LG study schedule looked like?

NoodleyOne wrote:I finished the section roughly 12 minutes early and went back over every game to confirm I got everything right.

I did.

/asshole

it'sjustme · Post by **it'sjustme** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:20 am

seancris wrote:How did all end up doing on this game? I ended up -2, somehow. Much better than expected.

-3 on the section.

Falls in the "not so bad after all" category for me.

-5 on the section, -3 on the zone game.

NoodleyOne · Post by **NoodleyOne** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:25 am

Locke89 wrote:Damn how did you get so fast? Just relentlessly taking LG over and over? Could you tell us what your LG study schedule looked like?

NoodleyOne wrote:I finished the section roughly 12 minutes early and went back over every game to confirm I got everything right.

I did.

/asshole

Eh, don't remember. Drunk. Just glad I actually did go -0 on that section. I talked way too much shit.

DaRascal · Post by **DaRascal** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:29 am

I got very lucky on this!

-1 on Zones, -3 LG. Sadly !Kung and LR took me to the woodshed.

cynthia rose · Post by **cynthia rose** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:23 am

-7 overall, -3 on zones. I performed exactly as bad as I thought I did.

Once I got my results I opened the lg section and did the games just to see if it was as bad as it seemed to have been...went -1. SMH. At this point I can only lmao, lg is literally the thing that kept me from hitting the 170+ that I should have. Alas, it's just not meant to be I suppose.

wisteria · Post by **wisteria** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 5:09 am

I had an experimental LG. After the test, I couldn't remember anything from either LG. I had to check the questions today to realize what "zones" was. It was a little weird, but I just applied all the restrictions one by one for each question. And that was it.

The June LG killed me....

CalAlumni · Post by **CalAlumni** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 5:12 am

I froze on this when my global diagram revealed no inferences....and then 5:00 min was called and I really panicked myself into paralysis. I guessed and guessed wrong on all zone questions. Fuck me.

bananapudding88 · Post by **bananapudding88** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:51 am

Can someone post a screenshot of their setup? Surprisingly, I ended up guessing ok on Zones (it was the other games that messed my shit up), but I still have no idea how this was supposed to have been set up! Pictures please!!

Manhattan LSAT Noah · Post by **Manhattan LSAT Noah** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:12 pm

I'm just now working on this for our explanation forums -- haven't checked all the inferences yet (protective caveat!), and am interested in hearing what others did.

Manhattan LSAT Noah · Post by **Manhattan LSAT Noah** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:17 pm

didn't write in the rules! I prefer to write the conditionals as anti-chunks. I find the more visually-connected my representations are with how they'd go into the board, the more I "get" the rules

fruitoftheloom · Post by **fruitoftheloom** » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:55 pm

This is how my set up looked.

Zoning LG Forum

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Register for access!

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Re: Zoning LG

Register now!