Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=195459
Great, now I've spent 10 minutes watching seinfeld clips.mrizza wrote:Relevantapplemaroon wrote:lol. I'm not so sure about that......................Alorain wrote:Its us, not you.applemaroon wrote:wow guys...I drilled 12 LR problems and we've jumped 2 pages on here? Either I'm WAY too slow or your guys are way too active on here tonight.
And that's a problem?gguuueessttt wrote: Great, now I've spent 10 minutes watching seinfeld clips.
....that's terrifying......Wormfather wrote:http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/v ... eWeMhPhD8m
Very nice, congratsenidwexler wrote:PT 56: 170!!!!!!!
LG: -2
LR1: -4
LR2: -3
RC: -2
First time legitimately cracking the 170 ceiling!
Awesome!mrizza wrote:Very nice, congratsenidwexler wrote:PT 56: 170!!!!!!!
LG: -2
LR1: -4
LR2: -3
RC: -2
First time legitimately cracking the 170 ceiling!
lol. Looks like Coughlin is pulling a Bellicheck. I can't spell their names.mrizza wrote:for the love of god and all that is holy... stop eli nao!
Coughlin should pull him nowPickledPanda wrote:lol. Looks like Coughlin is pulling a Bellicheck. I can't spell their names.mrizza wrote:for the love of god and all that is holy... stop eli nao!
Wicked! Well done!enidwexler wrote:PT 56: 170!!!!!!!
LG: -2
LR1: -4
LR2: -3
RC: -2
First time legitimately cracking the 170 ceiling!
Its funny how they pulled Bradshaw and left Eli in for so long. Looks like I'm still gonna pull out the win in fantasy this week though!desiballa21 wrote:Coughlin should pull him nowPickledPanda wrote:lol. Looks like Coughlin is pulling a Bellicheck. I can't spell their names.mrizza wrote:for the love of god and all that is holy... stop eli nao!
Everyone of those tattoos represents an opportunity for the contraction of disease.applemaroon wrote:
yum david beckham
Sugs is probably dying after looking at the twin ginger beards....Her life is complete.applemaroon wrote:
yum david beckham
Maybe drill games like crazy to try to get it to -0? Otherwise, just drill, seems like you're fairly consistent across the board, with RC being the biggest weakness. I personally think RC takes the most time to get better at, and is a lot more variable, so it might just be a better use of your time to try to get LG to 0 or LR to -5/6 total instead of -12. Certainly not an expert though!zniha wrote:Looking for a little advice on my last pt took yesterday went RC -8 LR -6 LG -5 LR -6, not really sure how to devide up my study time this week, looking for ideas/suggestions, I will be taking pt's tuesday and thursday unless someone thinks I should do more/less.
Just need a little guidance here.
Thats kind of what I was thinking to I'm just not sure if that kind of drilling is going to make a difference at this point or not.HawkeyeGirl wrote:Maybe drill games like crazy to try to get it to -0? Otherwise, just drill, seems like you're fairly consistent across the board, with RC being the biggest weakness. I personally think RC takes the most time to get better at, and is a lot more variable, so it might just be a better use of your time to try to get LG to 0 or LR to -5/6 total instead of -12. Certainly not an expert though!zniha wrote:Looking for a little advice on my last pt took yesterday went RC -8 LR -6 LG -5 LR -6, not really sure how to devide up my study time this week, looking for ideas/suggestions, I will be taking pt's tuesday and thursday unless someone thinks I should do more/less.
Just need a little guidance here.
edit: but don't burn yourself out! that could really kill you more than anything on test day.
It can help, but don't forget about maintaining your other sections!zniha wrote:
Thats kind of what I was thinking to I'm just not sure if that kind of drilling is going to make a difference at this point or not.
Have you looked into what question type you've been missing the most? Many question types on RC and LR overlap, so drilling one question type could lead to gains in both sections. For example, I'm pretty weak on inference questions, so when I really focus on those in practice, I find that I do better on inference questions in both LR and RC. If that doesn't work for you, I would just look at the question type you're missing the most in LR (drilling LG is a good idea too) so you could potentially see some gains in both LR sections. If it's a specific question type that's your weakness, you could easily pick up 2-3 points in each LR section with some serious drilling.zniha wrote:Looking for a little advice on my last pt took yesterday went RC -8 LR -6 LG -5 LR -6, not really sure how to devide up my study time this week, looking for ideas/suggestions, I will be taking pt's tuesday and thursday unless someone thinks I should do more/less.
Just need a little guidance here.
We must make babies now. Must propagate the race.HawkeyeGirl wrote:Sugs is probably dying after looking at the twin ginger beards....Her life is complete.applemaroon wrote:
yum david beckham
aw thanks chardee!Chardee_MacDennis wrote:Sup folks? Long time no talk.
Just wanted to pop in here and wish you all good luck for Saturday.