December 2012 Re-takers

1TLStudent
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 4:01 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby 1TLStudent » Sat Nov 17, 2012 8:51 pm

so this was a retake and I also corrected each section immediately after I finished it (but still timed and back-to-back in one go)

PT 54

RC -4
LR1 -0
LG -0
LR2 -2 (would of been minus one but I had a minute at the end and relooked at a question and changed it from right answer to wrong one *facepalm)

Score:175

Best retake test to date. Encouraging, since I only started studying again 2 weeks ago and I haven't done anything the last 4 days due to being sick.

User avatar
GabeQuixote
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby GabeQuixote » Sat Nov 17, 2012 9:01 pm

99.9luft wrote:Had a shit day today (fuck you PT 43 RC). Tomorrow is going to be better. Carrying on.

In other news, miss the tinychat waiting and worm's random ass hypotheticals mostly related to you-know-what. 8)


43 got you too? :-/

-5 for because of that final law passage

User avatar
gguuueessttt
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:18 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby gguuueessttt » Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:29 pm

Re-reading through the PS LR Bible.

If any of you read through this book and remember the question I'm talking about, did you think the synesthesia question was really dumb? It's probably the dumbest LR question I think I've seen thus far. (Not sure if I'm allowed to type it out here so I won't).

User avatar
Sugar Lumps
Posts: 771
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 7:50 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Sugar Lumps » Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:40 pm

gguuueessttt wrote:Re-reading through the PS LR Bible.

If any of you read through this book and remember the question I'm talking about, did you think the synesthesia question was really dumb? It's probably the dumbest LR question I think I've seen thus far. (Not sure if I'm allowed to type it out here so I won't).


GO OUT AND BE SOCIAL.

User avatar
PickledPanda
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:43 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby PickledPanda » Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:42 pm

Sugar Lumps wrote:
GO OUT AND BE SOCIAL.


Sup?

User avatar
Sugar Lumps
Posts: 771
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 7:50 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Sugar Lumps » Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:44 pm

PickledPanda wrote:
Sugar Lumps wrote:
GO OUT AND BE SOCIAL.


Sup?


Are you in Aspen?

User avatar
PickledPanda
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:43 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby PickledPanda » Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:46 pm

Almost there. These mountains are a steep climb though.

User avatar
Sugar Lumps
Posts: 771
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 7:50 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Sugar Lumps » Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:48 pm

PickledPanda wrote:Almost there. These mountains are a steep climb though.


Hurry UP. I want to get you drunk and take you sledding.

User avatar
PickledPanda
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:43 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby PickledPanda » Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:51 pm

You're the best. I wouldn't trust anyone else to rid me of my inhibitions. Gonna be the best. time. ever.

User avatar
HawkeyeGirl
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby HawkeyeGirl » Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:53 pm

I had way too much fun last night so I'm still recovering and watching A Few Good Men. Obviously I'll learn some LR skills watching the lawyers do their thang in this movie, so it's basically studying.

User avatar
Sugar Lumps
Posts: 771
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 7:50 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Sugar Lumps » Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:20 pm

Wormfather wrote:Waiting thread moment:

I want to shoot a swordfish and then laugh at it.

Edit: also I'm watching "Ted" and there was a moment that made me think of Sugar. Guess which one.


I haven't seen it. Now I'm scared.

User avatar
gguuueessttt
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:18 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby gguuueessttt » Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:30 pm

Sugar Lumps wrote:
gguuueessttt wrote:Re-reading through the PS LR Bible.

If any of you read through this book and remember the question I'm talking about, did you think the synesthesia question was really dumb? It's probably the dumbest LR question I think I've seen thus far. (Not sure if I'm allowed to type it out here so I won't).


GO OUT AND BE SOCIAL.


I DON'T WANT TO I ENJOY STUDYING AND I WILL CONTINUE TO TELL MYSELF THAT

User avatar
gguuueessttt
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:18 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby gguuueessttt » Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:30 pm

HawkeyeGirl wrote:I had way too much fun last night so I'm still recovering and watching A Few Good Men. Obviously I'll learn some LR skills watching the lawyers do their thang in this movie, so it's basically studying.


this morning*

User avatar
Cobretti
Posts: 2560
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Cobretti » Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:35 pm

gguuueessttt wrote:
Sugar Lumps wrote:
gguuueessttt wrote:Re-reading through the PS LR Bible.

If any of you read through this book and remember the question I'm talking about, did you think the synesthesia question was really dumb? It's probably the dumbest LR question I think I've seen thus far. (Not sure if I'm allowed to type it out here so I won't).


GO OUT AND BE SOCIAL.


I DON'T WANT TO I ENJOY STUDYING AND I WILL CONTINUE TO TELL MYSELF THAT

User avatar
gguuueessttt
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:18 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby gguuueessttt » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:03 am

gguuueessttt wrote:
Sugar Lumps wrote:
gguuueessttt wrote:Re-reading through the PS LR Bible.

If any of you read through this book and remember the question I'm talking about, did you think the synesthesia question was really dumb? It's probably the dumbest LR question I think I've seen thus far. (Not sure if I'm allowed to type it out here so I won't).


GO OUT AND BE SOCIAL.


I DON'T WANT TO I ENJOY STUDYING AND I WILL CONTINUE TO TELL MYSELF THAT


Just kidding. Heading to a frat party now (so lame but it's all my school's social scene has to offer). Will be on tinychat later if anyone else is still up.

User avatar
HawkeyeGirl
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby HawkeyeGirl » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:18 am

I'm bored....

User avatar
Lenahan3
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Lenahan3 » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:21 am

I started reading a new book late this morning and haven't stopped. That, my friends, has been my day in a nutshell.

User avatar
HawkeyeGirl
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby HawkeyeGirl » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:22 am

Lenahan3 wrote:I started reading a new book late this morning and haven't stopped. That, my friends, has been my day in a nutshell.


What book?

User avatar
Cobretti
Posts: 2560
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Cobretti » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:24 am

Did PT 34 today, very weird results...

1RC
3LR
6LG
173

No idea how to explain LG, definitely worrisome. Will definitely be drilling the shit out of it for the next week...

User avatar
HawkeyeGirl
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby HawkeyeGirl » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:26 am

mrizza wrote:Did PT 34 today, very weird results...

1RC
3LR
6LG
173

No idea how to explain LG, definitely worrisome. Will definitely be drilling the shit out of it for the next week...


Yikes!! -3LR isn't great for you either. What went wrong with games? Was it one game that got you?

User avatar
Cobretti
Posts: 2560
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Cobretti » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:29 am

HawkeyeGirl wrote:
mrizza wrote:Did PT 34 today, very weird results...

1RC
3LR
6LG
173

No idea how to explain LG, definitely worrisome. Will definitely be drilling the shit out of it for the next week...


Yikes!! -3LR isn't great for you either. What went wrong with games? Was it one game that got you?


Some weirdly worded questions, and it just felt like they never clicked. Gotta work on being able to adapt to non-traditional games better.

And 3LR isn't good, but its still realistically within my range, just the bottom end. Not really worried about that.

User avatar
Lenahan3
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Lenahan3 » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:32 am

HawkeyeGirl wrote:
Lenahan3 wrote:I started reading a new book late this morning and haven't stopped. That, my friends, has been my day in a nutshell.


What book?


Red Country. Joe Abercrombie. Best fantasy writer out right now.

User avatar
Lenahan3
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Lenahan3 » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:32 am

HawkeyeGirl wrote:
mrizza wrote:Did PT 34 today, very weird results...

1RC
3LR
6LG
173

No idea how to explain LG, definitely worrisome. Will definitely be drilling the shit out of it for the next week...


Yikes!! -3LR isn't great for you either. What went wrong with games? Was it one game that got you?


Which game was it? Those mid 30's games are ridiculous.

User avatar
Cobretti
Posts: 2560
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Cobretti » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:36 am

Lenahan3 wrote:
HawkeyeGirl wrote:
mrizza wrote:Did PT 34 today, very weird results...

1RC
3LR
6LG
173

No idea how to explain LG, definitely worrisome. Will definitely be drilling the shit out of it for the next week...


Yikes!! -3LR isn't great for you either. What went wrong with games? Was it one game that got you?


Which game was it? Those mid 30's games are ridiculous.


Honestly it was all of them. They were ridiculous. The one was a pretty standard ordering game, but it didn't list any of the variables, you had to derive the list from the rules... that definitely fucked with my head a little. Another one had 9 variables which seemed to slow down my hypos and got me behind the clock early. Overall just a mess.

User avatar
Lenahan3
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am

Re: December 2012 Re-takers

Postby Lenahan3 » Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:59 am

mrizza wrote:
Lenahan3 wrote:
HawkeyeGirl wrote:
mrizza wrote:Did PT 34 today, very weird results...

1RC
3LR
6LG
173

No idea how to explain LG, definitely worrisome. Will definitely be drilling the shit out of it for the next week...


Yikes!! -3LR isn't great for you either. What went wrong with games? Was it one game that got you?


Which game was it? Those mid 30's games are ridiculous.


Honestly it was all of them. They were ridiculous. The one was a pretty standard ordering game, but it didn't list any of the variables, you had to derive the list from the rules... that definitely fucked with my head a little. Another one had 9 variables which seemed to slow down my hypos and got me behind the clock early. Overall just a mess.


I just went and took a glance at Manhattan. Was that the PT with the Souderton and Rou-something or another game in it (Sp.)?
If so, I definitely remember it. I managed to wade through it with a -2 but it was a tough game. Prob top 10 all time.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], galeatus and 3 guests