December 2012 Re-takers Forum
- BitterSplitter
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:17 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
.
Last edited by BitterSplitter on Fri Jun 14, 2013 6:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Lenahan3
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
No offense guys, but everything/everybody talking at once last night seemed really convoluted. I'm going to review by myself like normal.
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
The benefit comes with explaining why answers are right to other people, causing you to really break down why answers are right. If you sit there and don't help explain answers, of course you wont get any benefit.Lenahan3 wrote:No offense guys, but everything/everybody talking at once last night seemed really convoluted. I'm going to review by myself like normal.
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I'm in class right now but if you need help going over your PTs I can hop on chat.applemaroon wrote:Lenahan3 wrote:No offense guys, but everything/everybody talking at once last night seemed really convoluted. I'm going to review by myself like normal.
What do you do for the few that you just can't figure out? I always review by myself afterwards, but reviewing in groups really help with ones I'm not sure about.
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
http://www.tinychat.com/decretakersapplemaroon wrote:Nah! I don't want to distract you from class . I just have 4 LR questions from 67 that I missed both on test day AND last week, and I just don't know why. Maybe we can chat another day about them if you're up for it?mrizza wrote:I'm in class right now but if you need help going over your PTs I can hop on chat.applemaroon wrote:Lenahan3 wrote:No offense guys, but everything/everybody talking at once last night seemed really convoluted. I'm going to review by myself like normal.
What do you do for the few that you just can't figure out? I always review by myself afterwards, but reviewing in groups really help with ones I'm not sure about.
- Lenahan3
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I know where the benefit lies. That doesn't change the fact that I perceive it as convoluted and don't really think it helps my LSAT habits. I didn't sit back last night; I left.mrizza wrote:The benefit comes with explaining why answers are right to other people, causing you to really break down why answers are right. If you sit there and don't help explain answers, of course you wont get any benefit.Lenahan3 wrote:No offense guys, but everything/everybody talking at once last night seemed really convoluted. I'm going to review by myself like normal.
- Lenahan3
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I've never run across one that I can't figure out.applemaroon wrote:Lenahan3 wrote:No offense guys, but everything/everybody talking at once last night seemed really convoluted. I'm going to review by myself like normal.
What do you do for the few that you just can't figure out? I always review by myself afterwards, but reviewing in groups really help with ones I'm not sure about.
That's not being cocky or anything. It takes a while sometimes, but I get there.
- Alorain
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:57 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I concur.Lenahan3 wrote:I've never run across one that I can't figure out.applemaroon wrote:Lenahan3 wrote:No offense guys, but everything/everybody talking at once last night seemed really convoluted. I'm going to review by myself like normal.
What do you do for the few that you just can't figure out? I always review by myself afterwards, but reviewing in groups really help with ones I'm not sure about.
That's not being cocky or anything. It takes a while sometimes, but I get there.
- SumStalwart
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:37 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Okay, I am back in the states for Thanksgiving and the December 2012 LSAT.
By the way, it turns out that I improperly entered my answers from my scantron onto LSATQA... and I got a 174 on PT56! It made me feel a bit better.
I took PT 57 on the plane and didn't do as poorly as I thought that I would.
AR: -2
LR1: -3
LR2:-4 >_<
RC: -3
169.
So, I guess that the lowest that I should get is a 169. Night without sleeping (to prevent jet lag), new test, 14 hr. plane ride, timed.
When I reviewed the answers, I realized that I made some really stupid mistakes like misreading some of the stems and answer choices. You have to love the assholes who sit on either side when you get stuck with a middle seat.
Where's the strangest place that you guys have taken a PT?
By the way, it turns out that I improperly entered my answers from my scantron onto LSATQA... and I got a 174 on PT56! It made me feel a bit better.
I took PT 57 on the plane and didn't do as poorly as I thought that I would.
AR: -2
LR1: -3
LR2:-4 >_<
RC: -3
169.
So, I guess that the lowest that I should get is a 169. Night without sleeping (to prevent jet lag), new test, 14 hr. plane ride, timed.
When I reviewed the answers, I realized that I made some really stupid mistakes like misreading some of the stems and answer choices. You have to love the assholes who sit on either side when you get stuck with a middle seat.
Where's the strangest place that you guys have taken a PT?
- Lenahan3
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Mine was the busstop last Friday.SumStalwart wrote:Okay, I am back in the states for Thanksgiving and the December 2012 LSAT.
By the way, it turns out that I improperly entered my answers from my scantron onto LSATQA... and I got a 174 on PT56! It made me feel a bit better.
I took PT 57 on the plane and didn't do as poorly as I thought that I would.
AR: -2
LR1: -3
LR2:-4 >_<
RC: -3
169.
So, I guess that the lowest that I should get is a 169. Night without sleeping (to prevent jet lag), new test, 14 hr. plane ride, timed.
When I reviewed the answers, I realized that I made some really stupid mistakes like misreading some of the stems and answer choices. You have to love the assholes who sit on either side when you get stuck with a middle seat.
Where's the strangest place that you guys have taken a PT?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- GabeQuixote
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
An entire test?Lenahan3 wrote:Mine was the busstop last Friday.SumStalwart wrote:Okay, I am back in the states for Thanksgiving and the December 2012 LSAT.
By the way, it turns out that I improperly entered my answers from my scantron onto LSATQA... and I got a 174 on PT56! It made me feel a bit better.
I took PT 57 on the plane and didn't do as poorly as I thought that I would.
AR: -2
LR1: -3
LR2:-4 >_<
RC: -3
169.
So, I guess that the lowest that I should get is a 169. Night without sleeping (to prevent jet lag), new test, 14 hr. plane ride, timed.
When I reviewed the answers, I realized that I made some really stupid mistakes like misreading some of the stems and answer choices. You have to love the assholes who sit on either side when you get stuck with a middle seat.
Where's the strangest place that you guys have taken a PT?
- Lenahan3
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Me? Yes. 5 sections.GabeQuixote wrote:An entire test?Lenahan3 wrote:Mine was the busstop last Friday.SumStalwart wrote:Okay, I am back in the states for Thanksgiving and the December 2012 LSAT.
By the way, it turns out that I improperly entered my answers from my scantron onto LSATQA... and I got a 174 on PT56! It made me feel a bit better.
I took PT 57 on the plane and didn't do as poorly as I thought that I would.
AR: -2
LR1: -3
LR2:-4 >_<
RC: -3
169.
So, I guess that the lowest that I should get is a 169. Night without sleeping (to prevent jet lag), new test, 14 hr. plane ride, timed.
When I reviewed the answers, I realized that I made some really stupid mistakes like misreading some of the stems and answer choices. You have to love the assholes who sit on either side when you get stuck with a middle seat.
Where's the strangest place that you guys have taken a PT?
- GabeQuixote
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
If I tried that at a bus stop here, I'd be crop dusted by bus exhaust.Lenahan3 wrote:
Me? Yes. 5 sections.
- Lenahan3
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I was. It was also a college busstop, so there were loud people everyyyyyywhere. And my papers were blowing around in the wind. It was hectic.GabeQuixote wrote:If I tried that at a bus stop here, I'd be crop dusted by bus exhaust.Lenahan3 wrote:
Me? Yes. 5 sections.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- GabeQuixote
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Then you have no excuse to not rock December.Lenahan3 wrote:I was. It was also a college busstop, so there were loud people everyyyyyywhere. And my papers were blowing around in the wind. It was hectic.GabeQuixote wrote:If I tried that at a bus stop here, I'd be crop dusted by bus exhaust.Lenahan3 wrote:
Me? Yes. 5 sections.
- Lenahan3
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
That's what I thought about October and I ended up taking a dirt nap. This test is a bomb that I intend to defuse, carefully and with a lot of respect for how it treated me last time.GabeQuixote wrote:Then you have no excuse to not rock December.Lenahan3 wrote:I was. It was also a college busstop, so there were loud people everyyyyyywhere. And my papers were blowing around in the wind. It was hectic.GabeQuixote wrote:If I tried that at a bus stop here, I'd be crop dusted by bus exhaust.Lenahan3 wrote:
Me? Yes. 5 sections.
- finnandjake2
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:41 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I bet you'd be getting them if you had a 167 instead of a 166. Just saying. There is a huge difference between the 25% and median at Minnesota and there 75% isn't much higher. 158/167/168 or something along those lines.GabeQuixote wrote:Nope. I am not getting a thing.Lenahan3 wrote:Anybody else been receiving a lot of U Minnesota e-mails and pamphlets?
If anyone thought this cycle was going to be easy for acceptances -- I disagree. The schools don't seem hungry enough to even send me an email.
Anyways, I'm sure you'll be getting plenty more stuff from schools after your retake.
- finnandjake2
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:41 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Diffusing bombs takes nerves of steel I'm sure... so this is a perfect analogy considering how anxiety provoking the LSAT can be. 180GabeQuixote wrote:That's what I thought about October and I ended up taking a dirt nap. This test is a bomb that I intend to defuse, carefully and with a lot of respect for how it treated me last time.Lenahan3 wrote:
Then you have no excuse to not rock December.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- GabeQuixote
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
finnandjake2 wrote:Diffusing bombs takes nerves of steel I'm sure... so this is a perfect analogy considering how anxiety provoking the LSAT can be. 180GabeQuixote wrote:That's what I thought about October and I ended up taking a dirt nap. This test is a bomb that I intend to defuse, carefully and with a lot of respect for how it treated me last time.Lenahan3 wrote:
Then you have no excuse to not rock December.
Funny thing is, once it's defused -- your problems REALLY start.
Case Books, outlines, The Bar, job hunting . . .
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Apparently 69% of people who take the bar pass.GabeQuixote wrote:
Case Books, outlines, The Bar, job hunting . . .
Getting a 31% on the LSAT isn't very hard. Albeit a more intelligent/more hard working group you are battling against, it doesn't worry me as you need like a top 95-98% to get into a T14 on the LSAT...(I realize it's pass/fail but it still helps paint a picture)
Job hunting though...oh joy.
- BitterSplitter
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:17 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
.
Last edited by BitterSplitter on Fri Jun 14, 2013 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- HawkeyeGirl
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
The fee waivers are reallllly weird. People with the same numbers definitely do not always get the same stuff. Minnesota specifically sent me information about their JD/MBA program, probably because I had a Finance degree and 2-4 years WE. I think UG major and WE are actually big factors in determining who gets a waiver or not (obviously along with the stats)BitterSplitter wrote:I dont think its about his score. I got an email, a few waiver, and a packet in the mail (today actually) from U Minn with a 166. Did you ever check any box on any test or form asking not to disclose your results to anyone? That may be it.finnandjake2 wrote:
I bet you'd be getting them if you had a 167 instead of a 166. Just saying. There is a huge difference between the 25% and median at Minnesota and there 75% isn't much higher. 158/167/168 or something along those lines.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login