RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

[sinfiery]

Comparitive last = exper?


anyone confirm?

[oaken]

I just read this.


"Did anyone else figure out that half of the first section and half of the third section were experimental? It's the only time in history that experimental has been divided up. So who the hell knows how we are gonna do now."

Apparently they mix the exp sections with real ones..

Wooooosh

EDIT: fuck if this is actually real i am going to look like such an idiot in this post

[CardozoLaw09]

Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?

Secondedddddddd

PLEASE tell me the 2nd RC was real (the one abt juries) the first one was FUCKED

and FUCK the Industrial ZONE GAME WTF. I was breezing through LG and then get hit with that bullshit wtfffffff

[WanderingPondering]

Almost positive 1st was real and 3rd was experimental

[oaken]

No one can be 100% sure that RC1 was real and RC2 sec 3 was experimental unless you work for LSAC and know something we don't. As for the sub zone game... I believe it was a rare mapping/ grouping game which was very hard. I've seen every game in lsac circulation and it was very hard.

Of course you can.

EDIT: man I'm grumpy

[southeastlaw]

But we confirm topics of passages for real
Rc?

[sinfiery]

Someone with 1 RC section posted

The RC with passages about a guy writing a book on a guy's contribution to african american film, monarch power and plants is the real one


Which was the first for me.

The comparative on the 3rd (experimental apparently) rc KILLED me.

I am very happy. Not that I rocked the first 1, but confident I didn't have a disaster.

[WanderingPondering]

Wait, its not possible that half of a section was real and half experimental is it?

That'd be wild.

[jjrialva]

Apparently the people that got 2 LGs are saying that...

[glucose101]

I doubt--altho wouldn't put it past LSAC--that it would be a split experimental. The 3rd was FREAKING hard. I was like WTF is this shiz. I immediately thght, the first one was too easy and different to be real. Although hard, the 3rd seemed more in line w LSAT stuff...UGH

[VUSisterRayVU]

Apparently the people that got 2 LGs are saying that...

This isn't true. I have the same passages as someone who had one RC.

[mqt]

These people talking about German and Spanish best be trolling, or else they had at least a pair of RC experimentals.

[jjrialva]

I believe you. still why are people getting so polarized impressions of the RCs? I believe my second RC was easy.. the first one with the KonG and stuff was very difficult and convoluted.

[VUSisterRayVU]

I believe you. still why are people getting so polarized impressions of the RCs? I believe my second RC was easy.. the first one with the KonG and stuff was very difficult and convoluted.

RC was your ! one.

[Pocahontas]

Only divine intervention can save me now. Better get used to the idea of attending a state school on scholly, cause my NU ED just went out of the window.

[jjrialva]

I believe you. still why are people getting so polarized impressions of the RCs? I believe my second RC was easy.. the first one with the KonG and stuff was very difficult and convoluted.

RC was your ! one.

What? didn't get that sorry I'm not from the US....

Your first RC has the Klong thing?

[sanjola]

Subzones LG really messed me up. Pretty disappointing since I was feeling good about everything up until that point. Not sure I shook it off properly for Section 5 either.

+1 I freaked out in the middle of section 5 because that ridiculous zone game. Thank goodness I was able to collect my self and finish in time.

[goden]

I had this format and my !Kong section was the 3rd, not the 1st. But I'm hearing both that 3rd is experimental and that !Kong is real.

Does this mean that people with the same experimental section can get them in different orders?

[collegebum1989]

Glad to see other TLSers struggling with this one. Definitely felt it was harder overall than the other PTs in 60's.

What are the chances the scaled scores change for this test compared to last ones? For example, -13 for #64, -14 for #65, and -10 for #66...hopefully it's more like #64 an #65 lol.

[VUSisterRayVU]

I had this format and my !Kong section was the 3rd, not the 1st. But I'm hearing both that 3rd is experimental and that !Kong is real.

Does this mean that people with the same experimental section can get them in different orders?

Yes.

[j-select]

Can we confirm whether the one with the passage about the first democratic societies was real or experimental?

[kkdk]

Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?

Pretty sure it was monarchy/loans, invasive plants, women's studies/bunch of exclamation marks, and African actor/biography.

My other section had Crisis, AI/layers, env regulation, and history/general laws. Others without an RCx have confirmed the former set as their RC, so I'm fairly confident.

[airplay355]

I had two RC sections and I didn't have any passages about german/spanish or the first democratic societies...

[airplay355]

Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?

Pretty sure it was monarchy/loans, invasive plants, women's studies/bunch of exclamation marks, and African actor/biography.

My other section had Crisis, AI/layers, env regulation, and history/general laws. Others without an RCx have confirmed the former set as their RC, so I'm fairly confident.

^ That's what I had too....

[Taus11]

Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?

Pretty sure it was monarchy/loans, invasive plants, women's studies/bunch of exclamation marks, and African actor/biography.

My other section had Crisis, AI/layers, env regulation, and history/general laws. Others without an RCx have confirmed the former set as their RC, so I'm fairly confident.

Yep this is correct.

My exp had a sweet passage about dark energy and Einstein relativity theory. But I really enjoyed the monarchs passage too.