anyone confirm?

jjrialva wrote:I just read this.
"Did anyone else figure out that half of the first section and half of the third section were experimental? It's the only time in history that experimental has been divided up. So who the hell knows how we are gonna do now."
Apparently they mix the exp sections with real ones..
southeastlaw wrote:Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?
butmens11 wrote:No one can be 100% sure that RC1 was real and RC2 sec 3 was experimental unless you work for LSAC and know something we don't. As for the sub zone game... I believe it was a rare mapping/ grouping game which was very hard. I've seen every game in lsac circulation and it was very hard.
jjrialva wrote:Apparently the people that got 2 LGs are saying that...
jjrialva wrote:I believe you. still why are people getting so polarized impressions of the RCs? I believe my second RC was easy.. the first one with the KonG and stuff was very difficult and convoluted.
VUSisterRayVU wrote:jjrialva wrote:I believe you. still why are people getting so polarized impressions of the RCs? I believe my second RC was easy.. the first one with the KonG and stuff was very difficult and convoluted.
RC was your ! one.
Nonconsecutive wrote:Subzones LG really messed me up. Pretty disappointing since I was feeling good about everything up until that point. Not sure I shook it off properly for Section 5 either.
goden wrote:I had this format and my !Kong section was the 3rd, not the 1st. But I'm hearing both that 3rd is experimental and that !Kong is real.
Does this mean that people with the same experimental section can get them in different orders?
southeastlaw wrote:Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?
kkdk wrote:southeastlaw wrote:Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?
Pretty sure it was monarchy/loans, invasive plants, women's studies/bunch of exclamation marks, and African actor/biography.
My other section had Crisis, AI/layers, env regulation, and history/general laws. Others without an RCx have confirmed the former set as their RC, so I'm fairly confident.
kkdk wrote:southeastlaw wrote:Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?
Pretty sure it was monarchy/loans, invasive plants, women's studies/bunch of exclamation marks, and African actor/biography.
My other section had Crisis, AI/layers, env regulation, and history/general laws. Others without an RCx have confirmed the former set as their RC, so I'm fairly confident.
Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum�
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests