RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

User avatar
sinfiery
Posts: 3308
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby sinfiery » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:03 pm

Comparitive last = exper?


anyone confirm? :(

User avatar
oaken
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:27 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby oaken » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:04 pm

jjrialva wrote:I just read this.


"Did anyone else figure out that half of the first section and half of the third section were experimental? It's the only time in history that experimental has been divided up. So who the hell knows how we are gonna do now."

Apparently they mix the exp sections with real ones..

Wooooosh

EDIT: fuck if this is actually real i am going to look like such an idiot in this post
Last edited by oaken on Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
CardozoLaw09
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby CardozoLaw09 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:05 pm

southeastlaw wrote:Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?


Secondedddddddd

PLEASE tell me the 2nd RC was real (the one abt juries) the first one was FUCKED

and FUCK the Industrial ZONE GAME WTF. I was breezing through LG and then get hit with that bullshit wtfffffff
Last edited by CardozoLaw09 on Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

WanderingPondering
Posts: 444
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:47 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby WanderingPondering » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:07 pm

Almost positive 1st was real and 3rd was experimental

User avatar
oaken
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:27 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby oaken » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:08 pm

butmens11 wrote:No one can be 100% sure that RC1 was real and RC2 sec 3 was experimental unless you work for LSAC and know something we don't. As for the sub zone game... I believe it was a rare mapping/ grouping game which was very hard. I've seen every game in lsac circulation and it was very hard.


Of course you can.

EDIT: man I'm grumpy

southeastlaw
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:50 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby southeastlaw » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:09 pm

But we confirm topics of passages for real
Rc?

User avatar
sinfiery
Posts: 3308
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby sinfiery » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:09 pm

Someone with 1 RC section posted

The RC with passages about a guy writing a book on a guy's contribution to african american film, monarch power and plants is the real one


Which was the first for me.

The comparative on the 3rd (experimental apparently) rc KILLED me.

I am very happy. Not that I rocked the first 1, but confident I didn't have a disaster.

WanderingPondering
Posts: 444
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:47 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby WanderingPondering » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:10 pm

Wait, its not possible that half of a section was real and half experimental is it?

That'd be wild.

jjrialva
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:13 pm

Apparently the people that got 2 LGs are saying that...

User avatar
glucose101
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:23 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby glucose101 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:15 pm

I doubt--altho wouldn't put it past LSAC--that it would be a split experimental. The 3rd was FREAKING hard. I was like WTF is this shiz. I immediately thght, the first one was too easy and different to be real. Although hard, the 3rd seemed more in line w LSAT stuff...UGH

User avatar
VUSisterRayVU
Posts: 162
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby VUSisterRayVU » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:17 pm

jjrialva wrote:Apparently the people that got 2 LGs are saying that...


This isn't true. I have the same passages as someone who had one RC.

User avatar
mqt
Posts: 2146
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 11:52 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby mqt » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:24 pm

These people talking about German and Spanish best be trolling, or else they had at least a pair of RC experimentals.

jjrialva
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:25 pm

I believe you. still why are people getting so polarized impressions of the RCs? I believe my second RC was easy.. the first one with the KonG and stuff was very difficult and convoluted.

User avatar
VUSisterRayVU
Posts: 162
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby VUSisterRayVU » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:28 pm

jjrialva wrote:I believe you. still why are people getting so polarized impressions of the RCs? I believe my second RC was easy.. the first one with the KonG and stuff was very difficult and convoluted.


RC was your ! one.

User avatar
Pocahontas
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:13 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby Pocahontas » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:29 pm

Only divine intervention can save me now. Better get used to the idea of attending a state school on scholly, cause my NU ED just went out of the window.

jjrialva
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:32 pm

VUSisterRayVU wrote:
jjrialva wrote:I believe you. still why are people getting so polarized impressions of the RCs? I believe my second RC was easy.. the first one with the KonG and stuff was very difficult and convoluted.


RC was your ! one.


What? didn't get that sorry I'm not from the US....

Your first RC has the Klong thing?

User avatar
sanjola
Posts: 479
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby sanjola » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:35 pm

Nonconsecutive wrote:Subzones LG really messed me up. Pretty disappointing since I was feeling good about everything up until that point. Not sure I shook it off properly for Section 5 either.


+1 I freaked out in the middle of section 5 because that ridiculous zone game. Thank goodness I was able to collect my self and finish in time.

User avatar
goden
Posts: 2268
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:52 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby goden » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:39 pm

I had this format and my !Kong section was the 3rd, not the 1st. But I'm hearing both that 3rd is experimental and that !Kong is real.

Does this mean that people with the same experimental section can get them in different orders?

collegebum1989
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:03 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby collegebum1989 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:39 pm

Glad to see other TLSers struggling with this one. Definitely felt it was harder overall than the other PTs in 60's.

What are the chances the scaled scores change for this test compared to last ones? For example, -13 for #64, -14 for #65, and -10 for #66...hopefully it's more like #64 an #65 lol.

User avatar
VUSisterRayVU
Posts: 162
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby VUSisterRayVU » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:40 pm

goden wrote:I had this format and my !Kong section was the 3rd, not the 1st. But I'm hearing both that 3rd is experimental and that !Kong is real.

Does this mean that people with the same experimental section can get them in different orders?


Yes.

j-select
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:42 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby j-select » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:41 pm

Can we confirm whether the one with the passage about the first democratic societies was real or experimental?

User avatar
kkdk
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:03 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby kkdk » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:42 pm

southeastlaw wrote:Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?


Pretty sure it was monarchy/loans, invasive plants, women's studies/bunch of exclamation marks, and African actor/biography.

My other section had Crisis, AI/layers, env regulation, and history/general laws. Others without an RCx have confirmed the former set as their RC, so I'm fairly confident.

airplay355
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:11 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby airplay355 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

I had two RC sections and I didn't have any passages about german/spanish or the first democratic societies... :shock:

airplay355
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:11 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby airplay355 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:45 pm

kkdk wrote:
southeastlaw wrote:Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?


Pretty sure it was monarchy/loans, invasive plants, women's studies/bunch of exclamation marks, and African actor/biography.

My other section had Crisis, AI/layers, env regulation, and history/general laws. Others without an RCx have confirmed the former set as their RC, so I'm fairly confident.


^ That's what I had too....

Taus11
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:05 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby Taus11 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:45 pm

kkdk wrote:
southeastlaw wrote:Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?


Pretty sure it was monarchy/loans, invasive plants, women's studies/bunch of exclamation marks, and African actor/biography.

My other section had Crisis, AI/layers, env regulation, and history/general laws. Others without an RCx have confirmed the former set as their RC, so I'm fairly confident.

Yep this is correct.

My exp had a sweet passage about dark energy and Einstein relativity theory. But I really enjoyed the monarchs passage too.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aurelius85 and 5 guests