RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

User avatar
RCinDNA
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:55 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby RCinDNA » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:21 pm

PeanutsNJam wrote:
Nolita Fairytale wrote:
airplay355 wrote:Also, WTF was up with that weird ass LG question? I'm sure you guys know which one. It started off stupid easy stayed stupid easy and then all of a sudden turned into a retarded mess. AMIRIGHT?


Don't tell me the subzones LG was the real one... Please?


It's the real one.


Crap. I'm cancelling. I didn't even get to it because I was tied up in the second one.

User avatar
05062014
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:05 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby 05062014 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:25 pm

VUSisterRayVU wrote:
abdistotle wrote:Lr were they both 25 or was one 26. Man rc ran outta time, LG was a mess ...I wish all 3 lrs could be graded


I think it was 25 and 25 for an overall score of 100.


God bless you

User avatar
Nonconsecutive
Posts: 2249
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby Nonconsecutive » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:26 pm

Subzones LG really messed me up. Pretty disappointing since I was feeling good about everything up until that point. Not sure I shook it off properly for Section 5 either.

tvelocity514
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:00 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby tvelocity514 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:32 pm

I know for a fact the first RC is the real and the 3rd is the experimental unfortunately. I thought the RC for the 3rd part was extremely easy. There was one passage on the first that was pretty difficult I thought. The LR sections I thought were definitely the easiest. The Logic Games definitely were the toughest for me. Apparently the first logic game was really easy but I had no idea. I thought the last 3 were pretty easy besides the last game having to constantly look back at the information given because it was a tad confusing. Guessed on 4 of the first 5 because not enough time to finish that section. Hoping everyone did amazing!

User avatar
annet
Posts: 218
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:19 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby annet » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:37 pm

jjrialva wrote:
PeanutsNJam wrote:I honestly think the 3rd one was harder but I might have been getting tired.

And yeah the LG was like

first 2 games: WOHOOO this is ezpz I'm rockin this
3rd game: shit
4th game: eh... whatever.



I'm with you on this one.. I said to myself "WTF are you wasting so much time on this game (3rd)" Sadly I had only 5 minutes to do the last one and had to guess 2...

The LRs a finished them with time to spare...


Exactly the same thing happened to me. I'm not super mad though because I was really careful on the first 3 games (I hope) and had at least narrowed down my 2 guess questions by at least 1.

I'm really hoping RC1 was real because, while strange, that was easy.

Anyone else grin at the pykrete ("paper-crete") LR question? I can't work the timing out if a test writer is a big fan of Mythbusters or it was just a coincidence. Still, great Mythbusters episode.

jjrialva
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:42 pm

Which RC had African Actors and Parliament? first or third?

User avatar
annet
Posts: 218
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:19 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby annet » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:45 pm

jjrialva wrote:Which RC had African Actors and Parliament? first or third?


[edit] removed for bad info - misunderstood the question.
Last edited by annet on Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

airplay355
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:11 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby airplay355 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:46 pm

Crap! I can't even remember which passages went where. I'm pretty sure Crisis was in the 3rd for me but I don't remember what that went with.

jonjon1324
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 3:22 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby jonjon1324 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:46 pm

PeanutsNJam wrote:
Nolita Fairytale wrote:
airplay355 wrote:Also, WTF was up with that weird ass LG question? I'm sure you guys know which one. It started off stupid easy stayed stupid easy and then all of a sudden turned into a retarded mess. AMIRIGHT?


Don't tell me the subzones LG was the real one... Please?


It's the real one.


So what the hell is the point of an experimental section? I got an experimental LG and I did great on it and felt so good. What was so experimental about it? The fact that it was so easy? Such bullshit

butmens11
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:37 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby butmens11 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:49 pm

No one can be 100% sure that RC1 was real and RC2 sec 3 was experimental unless you work for LSAC and know something we don't. As for the sub zone game... I believe it was a rare mapping/ grouping game which was very hard. I've seen every game in lsac circulation and it was very hard.

jjrialva
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:50 pm

Ok so we can say we got 2 DIFFERENT set ups for the RC LR RC LG LR if its true that for some the first RC was the real one... because the Klong thing was the first one for me too... someone confirmed to me the real RC contained African Actors and I believe that was my second RC section

dba415
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:50 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby dba415 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:50 pm

sucks that the 1st one was real. I guessed on at least 4 of those on the first.

the 2nd RC was SO EASY. During the section, I was actually shaking my head and smiling at how EASY the RC was, so I already suspected that it was the experimental.

f***. If the 3rd one was real, I am pretty sure I would have at least a 173. Since it isn't, I am probably in the 168s...

damn

EDIT: My theory is that LSAT put that easy RC in order to determine how easy is too easy, you know what I mean?

airplay355
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:11 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby airplay355 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:51 pm

butmens11 wrote:No one can be 100% sure that RC1 was real and RC2 sec 3 was experimental unless you work for LSAC and know something we don't. As for the sub zone game... I believe it was a rare mapping/ grouping game which was very hard. I've seen every game in lsac circulation and it was very hard.



False. Experimental sections aren't the same for everyone so it's easy to figure out what sections were real because we all have the same real sections.

jjrialva
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:52 pm

butmens11 wrote: As for the sub zone game... I believe it was a rare mapping/ grouping game which was very hard. I've seen every game in lsac circulation and it was very hard.


Same feeling.. just when one thinks LG is pretty standard they come up with this.. I had good guess I would say in that game... but I still guessed a lot..

jjrialva
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:54 pm

dba415 wrote:sucks that the 1st one was real. I guessed on at least 4 of those on the first.

the 2nd RC was SO EASY. During the section, I was actually shaking my head and smiling at how EASY the RC was, so I already suspected that it was the experimental.

f***. If the 3rd one was real, I am pretty sure I would have at least a 173. Since it isn't, I am probably in the 168s...

damn

EDIT: My theory is that LSAT put that easy RC in order to determine how easy is too easy, you know what I mean?



Last june the Hard RC was experimental.. the other RC was pretty straightforward..

User avatar
sinfiery
Posts: 3308
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby sinfiery » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:55 pm

So counting and language together was just to f*ck with me? Silly German and Spanish.


This be a great day.

User avatar
mqt
Posts: 2156
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 11:52 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby mqt » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:57 pm

Thought the 3rd section was harder, the comparative in particular. The first was quite straight-forward, except for the very first passage, which to me had some difficult assumptions to notice.

airplay355
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:11 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby airplay355 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:58 pm

German and spanish? Where the fuck was that?? :shock:

User avatar
RCinDNA
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:55 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby RCinDNA » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:58 pm

jonjon1324 wrote:
PeanutsNJam wrote:
Nolita Fairytale wrote:
airplay355 wrote:Also, WTF was up with that weird ass LG question? I'm sure you guys know which one. It started off stupid easy stayed stupid easy and then all of a sudden turned into a retarded mess. AMIRIGHT?


Don't tell me the subzones LG was the real one... Please?


It's the real one.


So what the hell is the point of an experimental section? I got an experimental LG and I did great on it and felt so good. What was so experimental about it? The fact that it was so easy? Such bullshit


They were experimenting with psychological tricks to destroy test takers' confidence.

User avatar
sinfiery
Posts: 3308
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby sinfiery » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:59 pm

Mqt wrote:Thought the 3rd section was harder, the comparative in particular. The first was quite straight-forward, except for the very first passage, which to me had some difficult assumptions to notice.

This
airplay355 wrote:German and spanish? Where the fuck was that?? :shock:

There

airplay355
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:11 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby airplay355 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:01 pm

I don't remember anything about german or spanish...must have blacked out.

jjrialva
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:01 pm

I just read this.


"Did anyone else figure out that half of the first section and half of the third section were experimental? It's the only time in history that experimental has been divided up. So who the hell knows how we are gonna do now."

Apparently they mix the exp sections with real ones..

airplay355
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:11 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby airplay355 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:02 pm

Oh well, that's lovely. I'm going to go drink gasoline now.

User avatar
VUSisterRayVU
Posts: 162
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby VUSisterRayVU » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:02 pm

annet wrote:
jjrialva wrote:Which RC had African Actors and Parliament? first or third?


This was my third. First had !Klung.


wat no

southeastlaw
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:50 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Postby southeastlaw » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:03 pm

Can we confirm what the real
Rc passages were?




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cherrygalore and 8 guests