Top Law Schools

jjrialva wrote:I had RC RC don't remember anything about spanish german etc...

!kong, african, Absolute government power, Bees and gardens, Learning/tongue of the mother (is that spanish/german)

I don't remember anything else... I don't remember hughe du bois...

bees/garden was an LR question

drwatson1989 wrote:the subzones, majors-speech topic games were REAL
the afro american theatre reading comp was REAL

Wait....you're saying that the only logic games section we had was the REAL one? Nooooooooo waaaaaaaay

VUSisterRayVU wrote:

jjrialva wrote:I had RC RC don't remember anything about spanish german etc...

!kong, african, Absolute government power, Bees and gardens, Learning/tongue of the mother (is that spanish/german)

I don't remember anything else... I don't remember hughe du bois...

bees/garden was an LR question

true..

So one comparative was about languages and numbers and the other??

Taus11 wrote:

Mqt wrote:Is the Einstein one supposed to be the same as the parity one?

The Einstein one was about two theories explaining the accelerated expansion of the universe

I'm officially confused. Did the people with this supposed German section have the Einstein section, or is it truly a mixed experimental?

jjrialva wrote: true..

So one comparative was about languages and numbers and the other??

Just a reminder to anyone about to help jjrialva out by getting more specific:
Don't get any more specific than this.

Mqt wrote:

Taus11 wrote:

Mqt wrote:Is the Einstein one supposed to be the same as the parity one?

The Einstein one was about two theories explaining the accelerated expansion of the universe

I'm officially confused. Did the people with this supposed German section have the Einstein section, or is it truly a mixed experimental?

Huh?

The real section was African American film/theater, the women literature about the !tribe, invasive species, and English/French omnipotent monarchs.

The rest are all experimental. We get different experimentals. The ones mentioned include but not limited to Einstein, German, judicial reasoning, Du Bois, etc.

Done. Settled.

@jjrialva - the other was about plants.

boblawlob wrote:1 RC had african actor and biography

1 RC had a talk on Langston Hughes and W. E. B. Du Bois

which one is it!!>?!??!

The biography.

Not that it matters but there apparently were two different experimental passages relating to African Americans, for those who might be confused on that. One about The Crisis and one about a modern-day AA renaissance (I had the latter).

cynthia rose wrote:@jjrialva - the other was about plants.

boblawlob wrote:1 RC had african actor and biography

1 RC had a talk on Langston Hughes and W. E. B. Du Bois

which one is it!!>?!??!

The biography.

Not that it matters but there apparently were two different experimental passages relating to African Americans, for those who might be confused on that. One about The Crisis and one about a modern-day AA renaissance (I had the latter).

So bio was real? Sweet.

Did anyone else think the AA bio section was particularly difficult to apply to questions?

Women literature = !Kong?

jjrialva wrote:Women literature = !Kong?

!Kung, yes.

Anyone think the LSAT purposely threw in the "!" to screw us all up?

boblawlob wrote:Anyone think the LSAT purposely threw in the "!" to screw us all up?

I was very glad I never read titles or author names. Made the passage about 88% as long as it would have been otherwise.


Almost got me confused on who was who, but it came to me eventually

All i have to say is that i hope the goddamn !Kung never ever get a housing subzone.

Am I the only one that liked the subzone game?

I actually felt really meh about this going in but felt super confident after every section - 5-10 mins to spare on all of them.

Triveal wrote:Am I the only one that liked the subzone game?

I actually felt really meh about this going in but felt super confident after every section - 5-10 mins to spare on all of them.

I would've liked the subzone game if I had 4 minutes left. Was really looking forward to crack that game. Unfortunately, only got to half of the problems.

Triveal wrote:Am I the only one that liked the subzone game?

I actually felt really meh about this going in but felt super confident after every section - 5-10 mins to spare on all of them.

I honestly feel good about the zoning game. To my benefit I messed up the experimental logic game section which was a lot easier, then took out my wrath on the harder one that counted. The RC was my first section and I feel pretty confident on that as well, though the "!Kung" did make me do a double take.

Triveal wrote:Am I the only one that liked the subzone game?

I actually felt really meh about this going in but felt super confident after every section - 5-10 mins to spare on all of them.

Nope, I felt pretty good about it too. It took me a second to figure out how to diagram it - but it felt fine once I understood the idea of it. Finished LG with 2 minutes to go and checked everything.

Praying that my 1st RC was experimental. It just felt weird and on top of some nerves I stared at the first question for what seemed like hours.
LG game 4 was...different? Game 1 was tough for a minute or two...nerves played a factor which sucks. Everyone said they would but I always thought it wouldn't happen to me. Next thing I know I'm trembling through the Main Point questions.

All in all pretty standard don't think I killed it like I hoped, but don't think it was my worst. A roller coaster ride to say the least.

The rules were really constricting so it was either 'this' or 'that'.

Once you determined it wasn't this, it was a bunch of plug and chug because of the lack of a max.


overall not too bad, but the first game took me 9 minutes and I gave up on #5 too. Had to come back to it. Realized I misread it and I think I got it right by the end, but it really came down to the wire.

Triveal wrote:Am I the only one that liked the subzone game?

I actually felt really meh about this going in but felt super confident after every section - 5-10 mins to spare on all of them.

You're not the only one. Thought it was a bit time consuming, but not that difficult.

boblawlob wrote:Anyone think the LSAT purposely threw in the "!" to screw us all up?

LOL at everyone freaking out over the exclamation point

Wow, I think my first RC section began with Kung! and that just threw me off compared to the others. I could almost swear that absolute power in monarchies was in my second RC section, as well as invasive species. The experimental this time around has really thrown me for a loop.

edit: section, not passage

i eeally hope the first lg section was the real one, the second lgi guessed on a lot they were really tough.... how certain are you that it was the experimental

A.Taarabt7 wrote:i eeally hope the first lg section was the real one, the second lgi guessed on a lot they were really tough.... how certain are you that it was the experimental

I CAN TELL EVERYONE FOR A FACT THAT THE REAL LG SECTION WAS THE ZONING, AND THE REAL RC WAS THE KUNG.....I WAS AN LR EXPERIMENTAL......