RC - LR - RC - LG - LR Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
aredhello

Bronze
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:42 pm

RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by aredhello » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:52 pm

.
Last edited by aredhello on Wed Aug 14, 2013 5:51 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
PeanutsNJam

Gold
Posts: 4670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by PeanutsNJam » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:53 pm

It was easy. The 3rd was much harder. If the first was experimental, than fck the world.

airplay355

New
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:11 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by airplay355 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:57 pm

I thought the same thing. The first seemed way different than what I was expecting. The second RC was much easier and way more run of the mill. I really hope the first RC was experimental.

Also, WTF was up with that weird ass LG question? I'm sure you guys know which one. It started off stupid easy stayed stupid easy and then all of a sudden turned into a retarded mess. AMIRIGHT?

User avatar
PeanutsNJam

Gold
Posts: 4670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by PeanutsNJam » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:59 pm

I honestly think the 3rd one was harder but I might have been getting tired.

And yeah the LG was like

first 2 games: WOHOOO this is ezpz I'm rockin this
3rd game: shit
4th game: eh... whatever.

VasaVasori

Silver
Posts: 571
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:36 pm

.

Post by VasaVasori » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:01 pm

.
Last edited by VasaVasori on Sat May 02, 2015 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Nolita Fairytale

New
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by Nolita Fairytale » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:04 pm

airplay355 wrote:Also, WTF was up with that weird ass LG question? I'm sure you guys know which one. It started off stupid easy stayed stupid easy and then all of a sudden turned into a retarded mess. AMIRIGHT?
Don't tell me the subzones LG was the real one... Please?

jjrialva

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:05 pm

So the one that was hard and strange as F was the real one?????????? I too thought the third one was the real one because it seem more in line with past RC...

User avatar
PeanutsNJam

Gold
Posts: 4670
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by PeanutsNJam » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:06 pm

Nolita Fairytale wrote:
airplay355 wrote:Also, WTF was up with that weird ass LG question? I'm sure you guys know which one. It started off stupid easy stayed stupid easy and then all of a sudden turned into a retarded mess. AMIRIGHT?
Don't tell me the subzones LG was the real one... Please?
It's the real one.

Nolita Fairytale

New
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by Nolita Fairytale » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:06 pm

PeanutsNJam wrote:
Nolita Fairytale wrote:
airplay355 wrote:Also, WTF was up with that weird ass LG question? I'm sure you guys know which one. It started off stupid easy stayed stupid easy and then all of a sudden turned into a retarded mess. AMIRIGHT?
Don't tell me the subzones LG was the real one... Please?
It's the real one.
Great... Thanks!

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


aredhello

Bronze
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:42 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by aredhello » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:06 pm

Nolita, that was real.

Thought the 3rd RC was fairly straightforward and easy.

The first RC was okay, just seemed weird to me. And suspecting that it was an experimental, I used my last five minutes to go to the bathroom instead of checking my work.

Sigh.

jjrialva

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:07 pm

Nolita Fairytale wrote:
airplay355 wrote:Also, WTF was up with that weird ass LG question? I'm sure you guys know which one. It started off stupid easy stayed stupid easy and then all of a sudden turned into a retarded mess. AMIRIGHT?
Don't tell me the subzones LG was the real one... Please?

YES...

!!!! I really good at LG but this LG was harder than the last one... I had 5 minutes for the last game...

jjrialva

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:07 pm

aredhello wrote:Nolita, that was real.

Thought the 3rd RC was fairly straightforward and easy.

The first RC was okay, just seemed weird to me. And suspecting that it was an experimental, I used my last five minutes to go to the bathroom instead of checking my work.

Sigh.
So it wasn't experimental? FOR SURE???

jjrialva

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:09 pm

PeanutsNJam wrote:I honestly think the 3rd one was harder but I might have been getting tired.

And yeah the LG was like

first 2 games: WOHOOO this is ezpz I'm rockin this
3rd game: shit
4th game: eh... whatever.

I'm with you on this one.. I said to myself "WTF are you wasting so much time on this game (3rd)" Sadly I had only 5 minutes to do the last one and had to guess 2...

The LRs a finished them with time to spare...

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
oaken

Bronze
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:27 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by oaken » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:09 pm

jjrialva wrote:
aredhello wrote:Nolita, that was real.

Thought the 3rd RC was fairly straightforward and easy.

The first RC was okay, just seemed weird to me. And suspecting that it was an experimental, I used my last five minutes to go to the bathroom instead of checking my work.

Sigh.
So it wasn't experimental? FOR SURE???
1st was real, 3rd was experimental

At least according to some dude in another thread

jjrialva

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:11 pm

oaken wrote:
jjrialva wrote:
aredhello wrote:Nolita, that was real.

Thought the 3rd RC was fairly straightforward and easy.

The first RC was okay, just seemed weird to me. And suspecting that it was an experimental, I used my last five minutes to go to the bathroom instead of checking my work.

Sigh.
So it wasn't experimental? FOR SURE???
1st was real, 3rd was experimental

At least according to some dude in another thread
&*^* ... I thought the third one straight forward one was the real one.. this means I should cancel my score!? I had to guess like 4 on that RC... I can't believe after scoring consistent 163+ Im gonna score again below 160....

aredhello

Bronze
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:42 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by aredhello » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:14 pm

1st RC confirmed real, 3rd RC confirmed experimental.

Given this fact (was certain 1st was experimental) and the decidedly less than predictable LG, the LSAT continues to baffle me.

User avatar
oaken

Bronze
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:27 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by oaken » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:14 pm

jjrialva wrote:
oaken wrote:
jjrialva wrote:
aredhello wrote:Nolita, that was real.

Thought the 3rd RC was fairly straightforward and easy.

The first RC was okay, just seemed weird to me. And suspecting that it was an experimental, I used my last five minutes to go to the bathroom instead of checking my work.

Sigh.
So it wasn't experimental? FOR SURE???
1st was real, 3rd was experimental

At least according to some dude in another thread
&*^* ... I thought the third one straight forward one was the real one.. this means I should cancel my score!? I had to guess like 4 on that RC... I can't believe after scoring consistent 163+ Im gonna score again below 160....
Idk maybe the curve will be adjusted accordingly - I feel the same way though, the first one I was bubbling in my last answer as time was called and wanted to go back and review like 4 or 5, and the 3rd i had over 5 minutes and was super confident about all of my answers.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


jjrialva

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:15 pm

How do admission officers look upon lower scores in the second take????

airplay355

New
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:11 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by airplay355 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:15 pm

Could the first and 3rd RCs be swapped for people so we think we had the same test when we actually didn't?

User avatar
oaken

Bronze
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:27 am

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by oaken » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:16 pm

airplay355 wrote:Could the first and 3rd RCs be swapped for people so we think we had the same test when we actually didn't?
removed, felt too specific
Last edited by oaken on Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

aredhello

Bronze
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:42 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by aredhello » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:17 pm

Well -- someone in another thread confirmed which one was the real one by describing the content of the passages. And that was the first one for me.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
05062014

Bronze
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:05 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by 05062014 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:18 pm

Lr were they both 25 or was one 26. Man rc ran outta time, LG was a mess ...I wish all 3 lrs could be graded

jjrialva

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:18 pm

airplay355 wrote:Could the first and 3rd RCs be swapped for people so we think we had the same test when we actually didn't?

I was saying the same thing.. but they say the first RC with the odd first passage that had a weird point of view (a paragraph started in first person (really unusual) )))) was the real one

User avatar
VUSisterRayVU

Bronze
Posts: 162
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by VUSisterRayVU » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:19 pm

abdistotle wrote:Lr were they both 25 or was one 26. Man rc ran outta time, LG was a mess ...I wish all 3 lrs could be graded
I think it was 25 and 25 for an overall score of 100.

airplay355

New
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:11 pm

Re: RC - LR - RC - LG - LR

Post by airplay355 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:21 pm

Well, it is what it is I guess...why the hell would they give us normal questions as an experimental? That question structure seemed like the tried and tested kind while the other was all sorts of weird. I don't think I did that bad it just felt weird...

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”