Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=195400
jato wrote:I absolutely remember my 3rd LR (section 4) had a question about fish X,Y,Z and how it related to plankton. I'm hoping that was the experimental.
Yes I did. Darn, I crushed that first LR section. Oh well.skri65 wrote:jato wrote:I absolutely remember my 3rd LR (section 4) had a question about fish X,Y,Z and how it related to plankton. I'm hoping that was the experimental.
Fish and plankton was real. Did you have 25 questions on all your LR? If so, it seems likely that the first LR was experimental.
YES!!!! THAT 1st lr section was brutal, so it seems pretty confirmed that the first LR was experimental, yeah and that question was the first, my brain froze from starting-test-anxiety and i skipped itCalAlumni wrote:I remember that ancient fire human heat shit. I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and the first LR was weird and hard as fuck. I felt terrible after that section. Seems like the first LR was the experimental.skri65 wrote:Yes, finally! I remember that! The ancient fire human heat was in my first LR section (the one question i truly remember from that section) and was one of the first questions (if not the first??). Can anyone confirm that this was an EXP question? This will finally 100% resolve the question of which one was the experimental.
HAH! Yes, I've had panic attacks on the first question of an LSAT before. I got to that question, stared at it, and just couldn't believe it was happening again. I pushed through that section fine, but it was definitely the worst of the three for me.enigmabk wrote:YES!!!! THAT 1st lr section was brutal, so it seems pretty confirmed that the first LR was experimental, yeah and that question was the first, my brain froze from starting-test-anxiety and i skipped itCalAlumni wrote:I remember that ancient fire human heat shit. I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and the first LR was weird and hard as fuck. I felt terrible after that section. Seems like the first LR was the experimental.skri65 wrote:Yes, finally! I remember that! The ancient fire human heat was in my first LR section (the one question i truly remember from that section) and was one of the first questions (if not the first??). Can anyone confirm that this was an EXP question? This will finally 100% resolve the question of which one was the experimental.
skri65 wrote:enigmabk wrote:YES!!!! THAT 1st lr section was brutal, so it seems pretty confirmed that the first LR was experimental, yeah and that question was the first, my brain froze from starting-test-anxiety and i skipped itCalAlumni wrote:I remember that ancient fire human heat shit. I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and the first LR was weird and hard as fuck. I felt terrible after that section. Seems like the first LR was the experimental.skri65 wrote:Yes, finally! I remember that! The ancient fire human heat was in my first LR section (the one question i truly remember from that section) and was one of the first questions (if not the first??). Can anyone confirm that this was an EXP question? This will finally 100% resolve the question of which one was the experimental.
HAH! Yes, I've had panic attacks on the first question of an LSAT before. I got to that question, stared at it, and just couldn't believe it was happening again. I pushed through that section fine, but it was definitely the worst of the three for me.
msmith19 wrote:Also, shouldn't we get some kind of reward for completing 3 of the most draining section?
weye wrote:Scotland.
I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and CAN confirm that I did not have any questions about "ancient fire human heat." It appears that my experimental section was different from your experimental. I think I remember mine being 26 questions long.CalAlumni wrote:I remember that ancient fire human heat shit. I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and the first LR was weird and hard as fuck. I felt terrible after that section. Seems like the first LR was the experimental.skri65 wrote:Yes, finally! I remember that! The ancient fire human heat was in my first LR section (the one question i truly remember from that section) and was one of the first questions (if not the first??). Can anyone confirm that this was an EXP question? This will finally 100% resolve the question of which one was the experimental.
If it helps, I remember that the peaches/apricot question was one of the first questions in my third LR section (which was my fourth section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG). It has since been confirmed that this section was the graded one. I am almost 100% certain that the "suspects" question was in my second LR section (third section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG), as I remember spending the last five minutes before the break trying to pick between two choices. I am still not convinced that there was a 100% right answer, one just seemed more right than the other...mtr123456 wrote:abcde12345 wrote:How bout you guys list questions you think were experimental, and I'll try to tell you if they were. (2LR here)
none of us can remember any questions from our LR1/3 (that we think is experimental).....this is our problem....ugh
do you know any questions that were specifically in one LR section and the other?
Pereos wrote:If it helps, I remember that the peaches/apricot question was one of the first questions in my third LR section (which was my fourth section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG). It has since been confirmed that this section was the graded one. I am almost 100% certain that the "suspects" question was in my second LR section (third section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG), as I remember spending the last five minutes before the break trying to pick between two choices. I am still not convinced that there was a 100% right answer, one just seemed more right than the other...mtr123456 wrote:abcde12345 wrote:How bout you guys list questions you think were experimental, and I'll try to tell you if they were. (2LR here)
none of us can remember any questions from our LR1/3 (that we think is experimental).....this is our problem....ugh
do you know any questions that were specifically in one LR section and the other?
Having said that, it appears that if this was the graded section as nonLR experimental have stated, then my first LR was the experimental. However, I am having trouble remembering when the "orange fish" question came in and whether or not that was a graded one. People have said that it was not graded, but I would swear that it was in the same section as the "suspects" question. I could be remembering wrong.
I think I had the same setup as you and agree that I wish the "suspects" section was the experimental. It appears it is not unfortunately. The other two sections seemed fairly easy in comparison to this one. Although I had five minutes to spare on each of the sections (a fluke for me that can only be attributed to my extreme focus and confidence as a third-retaker), the "suspects" section had the most questions that I had to go back and review. The "suspects" question in particular was the one that I spent the entirety of my review time on...was one of the answers really better than the other? There didn't seem to be an answer that fit exactly with what the stimulus asked in my opinion, without getting into detail.boredtodeath wrote:I had this ordering of sections as well.
I think my "suspects" LR section was 3rd, and I'm HOPING that was the experimental because that section seemed very strange to me, wasn't sure about a lot of my answers. Apparently this section is real though and for people who had it third the first LR section is exp? That would suck because I feel like I cruuushed the first section.
Yes you are remembering the question correctly.ppl123 wrote:the suspect question was about robbing an office or company or something?
if so, i also think that was LR2....i had 25-25-25 but i think then i can say forsure that LR1 was exp.
Pereos wrote:If it helps, I remember that the peaches/apricot question was one of the first questions in my third LR section (which was my fourth section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG). It has since been confirmed that this section was the graded one. I am almost 100% certain that the "suspects" question was in my second LR section (third section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG), as I remember spending the last five minutes before the break trying to pick between two choices. I am still not convinced that there was a 100% right answer, one just seemed more right than the other...mtr123456 wrote:abcde12345 wrote:How bout you guys list questions you think were experimental, and I'll try to tell you if they were. (2LR here)
none of us can remember any questions from our LR1/3 (that we think is experimental).....this is our problem....ugh
do you know any questions that were specifically in one LR section and the other?
Having said that, it appears that if this was the graded section as nonLR experimental have stated, then my first LR was the experimental. However, I am having trouble remembering when the "orange fish" question came in and whether or not that was a graded one. People have said that it was not graded, but I would swear that it was in the same section as the "suspects" question. I could be remembering wrong.
ugh...dont get me overthinking this....lollshopes wrote:I may be completely crazy by now but I swear I had LR-LR-RC-LR-LG did anyone else have this? I know someone else who remembers it this way
This is the first sighting of that particular order. Doesn't mean it didn't happen, but with the vast array of TLS users, it seems odd that no one has mentioned it prior to you.lshopes wrote:I may be completely crazy by now but I swear I had LR-LR-RC-LR-LG did anyone else have this? I know someone else who remembers it this way
The suspects question? If it involved the mayors office and treasury or something like that then yes, I had this question and it sucked. I had RC experimental.ppl123 wrote:can non-LR experimentals confirm that they had this question?
born4law wrote:Did anyone have an LR section with a question about computer chips (speed, size, sophistication)? Was this the experimental?
