LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby skri65 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:59 pm

jato wrote:I absolutely remember my 3rd LR (section 4) had a question about fish X,Y,Z and how it related to plankton. I'm hoping that was the experimental.



Fish and plankton was real. Did you have 25 questions on all your LR? If so, it seems likely that the first LR was experimental.

User avatar
jato
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 4:50 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby jato » Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:03 pm

skri65 wrote:
jato wrote:I absolutely remember my 3rd LR (section 4) had a question about fish X,Y,Z and how it related to plankton. I'm hoping that was the experimental.



Fish and plankton was real. Did you have 25 questions on all your LR? If so, it seems likely that the first LR was experimental.


Yes I did. Darn, I crushed that first LR section. Oh well.

enigmabk
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:52 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby enigmabk » Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:30 pm

CalAlumni wrote:
skri65 wrote:Yes, finally! I remember that! The ancient fire human heat was in my first LR section (the one question i truly remember from that section) and was one of the first questions (if not the first??). Can anyone confirm that this was an EXP question? This will finally 100% resolve the question of which one was the experimental.


I remember that ancient fire human heat shit. I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and the first LR was weird and hard as fuck. I felt terrible after that section. Seems like the first LR was the experimental.


YES!!!! THAT 1st lr section was brutal, so it seems pretty confirmed that the first LR was experimental, yeah and that question was the first, my brain froze from starting-test-anxiety and i skipped it :) :) :)

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby skri65 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:44 pm

enigmabk wrote:
CalAlumni wrote:
skri65 wrote:Yes, finally! I remember that! The ancient fire human heat was in my first LR section (the one question i truly remember from that section) and was one of the first questions (if not the first??). Can anyone confirm that this was an EXP question? This will finally 100% resolve the question of which one was the experimental.


I remember that ancient fire human heat shit. I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and the first LR was weird and hard as fuck. I felt terrible after that section. Seems like the first LR was the experimental.


YES!!!! THAT 1st lr section was brutal, so it seems pretty confirmed that the first LR was experimental, yeah and that question was the first, my brain froze from starting-test-anxiety and i skipped it :) :) :)


HAH! Yes, I've had panic attacks on the first question of an LSAT before. I got to that question, stared at it, and just couldn't believe it was happening again. I pushed through that section fine, but it was definitely the worst of the three for me.

enigmabk
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:52 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby enigmabk » Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:48 pm

skri65 wrote:
enigmabk wrote:
CalAlumni wrote:
skri65 wrote:Yes, finally! I remember that! The ancient fire human heat was in my first LR section (the one question i truly remember from that section) and was one of the first questions (if not the first??). Can anyone confirm that this was an EXP question? This will finally 100% resolve the question of which one was the experimental.


I remember that ancient fire human heat shit. I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and the first LR was weird and hard as fuck. I felt terrible after that section. Seems like the first LR was the experimental.


YES!!!! THAT 1st lr section was brutal, so it seems pretty confirmed that the first LR was experimental, yeah and that question was the first, my brain froze from starting-test-anxiety and i skipped it :) :) :)
:)

HAH! Yes, I've had panic attacks on the first question of an LSAT before. I got to that question, stared at it, and just couldn't believe it was happening again. I pushed through that section fine, but it was definitely the worst of the three for me.



so relieving to know that im not alone, best of luck to us, as i feel like in the other 2 LR sections, there were only like 1-3 tricky questions each :)

User avatar
facile princeps
Posts: 421
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby facile princeps » Sun Oct 07, 2012 12:20 am

Nothing to offer; I'm only here for the post-mortem analysis

Image

talesofyore
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:21 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby talesofyore » Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:59 am

msmith19 wrote:Also, shouldn't we get some kind of reward for completing 3 of the most draining section?



I've been thinking that too! It's damn unfair to put LG at the end of four of the most draining sections!

weye
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:11 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby weye » Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:41 am

I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and my reading comprehension didn't have anything about the !Kung. Mine was about Chinese language, the Sahara evolutionary model, compensation for intangible harm, and art fraud.

weye
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:11 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby weye » Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:19 am

Scotland.

ppl123
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:02 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby ppl123 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:21 am

weye wrote:Scotland.



lol ....then that would be why

User avatar
VUSisterRayVU
Posts: 162
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby VUSisterRayVU » Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:25 am

Being Scottish is shite. Never forget.

Pereos
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:32 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby Pereos » Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:02 pm

CalAlumni wrote:
skri65 wrote:Yes, finally! I remember that! The ancient fire human heat was in my first LR section (the one question i truly remember from that section) and was one of the first questions (if not the first??). Can anyone confirm that this was an EXP question? This will finally 100% resolve the question of which one was the experimental.


I remember that ancient fire human heat shit. I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and the first LR was weird and hard as fuck. I felt terrible after that section. Seems like the first LR was the experimental.


I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG and CAN confirm that I did not have any questions about "ancient fire human heat." It appears that my experimental section was different from your experimental. I think I remember mine being 26 questions long.

Pereos
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:32 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby Pereos » Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:09 pm

mtr123456 wrote:
abcde12345 wrote:How bout you guys list questions you think were experimental, and I'll try to tell you if they were. (2LR here)



none of us can remember any questions from our LR1/3 (that we think is experimental).....this is our problem....ugh
do you know any questions that were specifically in one LR section and the other?


If it helps, I remember that the peaches/apricot question was one of the first questions in my third LR section (which was my fourth section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG). It has since been confirmed that this section was the graded one. I am almost 100% certain that the "suspects" question was in my second LR section (third section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG), as I remember spending the last five minutes before the break trying to pick between two choices. I am still not convinced that there was a 100% right answer, one just seemed more right than the other...

Having said that, it appears that if this was the graded section as nonLR experimental have stated, then my first LR was the experimental. However, I am having trouble remembering when the "orange fish" question came in and whether or not that was a graded one. People have said that it was not graded, but I would swear that it was in the same section as the "suspects" question. I could be remembering wrong.

ppl123
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:02 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby ppl123 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:14 pm

the suspect question was about robbing an office or company or something?

if so, i also think that was LR2....i had 25-25-25 but i think then i can say forsure that LR1 was exp.

Pereos wrote:
mtr123456 wrote:
abcde12345 wrote:How bout you guys list questions you think were experimental, and I'll try to tell you if they were. (2LR here)



none of us can remember any questions from our LR1/3 (that we think is experimental).....this is our problem....ugh
do you know any questions that were specifically in one LR section and the other?


If it helps, I remember that the peaches/apricot question was one of the first questions in my third LR section (which was my fourth section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG). It has since been confirmed that this section was the graded one. I am almost 100% certain that the "suspects" question was in my second LR section (third section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG), as I remember spending the last five minutes before the break trying to pick between two choices. I am still not convinced that there was a 100% right answer, one just seemed more right than the other...

Having said that, it appears that if this was the graded section as nonLR experimental have stated, then my first LR was the experimental. However, I am having trouble remembering when the "orange fish" question came in and whether or not that was a graded one. People have said that it was not graded, but I would swear that it was in the same section as the "suspects" question. I could be remembering wrong.

Pereos
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:32 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby Pereos » Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:18 pm

boredtodeath wrote:I had this ordering of sections as well.

I think my "suspects" LR section was 3rd, and I'm HOPING that was the experimental because that section seemed very strange to me, wasn't sure about a lot of my answers. Apparently this section is real though and for people who had it third the first LR section is exp? That would suck because I feel like I cruuushed the first section.


I think I had the same setup as you and agree that I wish the "suspects" section was the experimental. It appears it is not unfortunately. The other two sections seemed fairly easy in comparison to this one. Although I had five minutes to spare on each of the sections (a fluke for me that can only be attributed to my extreme focus and confidence as a third-retaker), the "suspects" section had the most questions that I had to go back and review. The "suspects" question in particular was the one that I spent the entirety of my review time on...was one of the answers really better than the other? There didn't seem to be an answer that fit exactly with what the stimulus asked in my opinion, without getting into detail.

Pereos
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:32 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby Pereos » Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:20 pm

ppl123 wrote:the suspect question was about robbing an office or company or something?

if so, i also think that was LR2....i had 25-25-25 but i think then i can say forsure that LR1 was exp.

Pereos wrote:
mtr123456 wrote:
abcde12345 wrote:How bout you guys list questions you think were experimental, and I'll try to tell you if they were. (2LR here)



none of us can remember any questions from our LR1/3 (that we think is experimental).....this is our problem....ugh
do you know any questions that were specifically in one LR section and the other?


If it helps, I remember that the peaches/apricot question was one of the first questions in my third LR section (which was my fourth section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG). It has since been confirmed that this section was the graded one. I am almost 100% certain that the "suspects" question was in my second LR section (third section out of LR-RC-LR-LR-LG), as I remember spending the last five minutes before the break trying to pick between two choices. I am still not convinced that there was a 100% right answer, one just seemed more right than the other...

Having said that, it appears that if this was the graded section as nonLR experimental have stated, then my first LR was the experimental. However, I am having trouble remembering when the "orange fish" question came in and whether or not that was a graded one. People have said that it was not graded, but I would swear that it was in the same section as the "suspects" question. I could be remembering wrong.


Yes you are remembering the question correctly.

ppl123
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:02 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby ppl123 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:21 pm

can non-LR experimentals confirm that they had this question?

User avatar
bitsy
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:06 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby bitsy » Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:38 pm

LG exp-- the mayors office//suspects//treasury question was graded

lshopes
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:22 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby lshopes » Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:40 pm

I may be completely crazy by now but I swear I had LR-LR-RC-LR-LG did anyone else have this? I know someone else who remembers it this way

ppl123
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:02 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby ppl123 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:46 pm

lshopes wrote:I may be completely crazy by now but I swear I had LR-LR-RC-LR-LG did anyone else have this? I know someone else who remembers it this way


ugh...dont get me overthinking this....lol
i definitely remember bombing my first LR...and then having RC....and bombing that too....then i had the other LR and i thought i did well....and then after the break i was praying for RC.....but then it was LR and then LG....

so no, i dont remember that.... but who knows maybe you did have that...

User avatar
Eberry
Posts: 12102
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:32 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby Eberry » Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:01 pm

lshopes wrote:I may be completely crazy by now but I swear I had LR-LR-RC-LR-LG did anyone else have this? I know someone else who remembers it this way


This is the first sighting of that particular order. Doesn't mean it didn't happen, but with the vast array of TLS users, it seems odd that no one has mentioned it prior to you.

User avatar
annet
Posts: 218
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:19 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby annet » Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:02 pm

ppl123 wrote:can non-LR experimentals confirm that they had this question?


The suspects question? If it involved the mayors office and treasury or something like that then yes, I had this question and it sucked. I had RC experimental.

born4law
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:56 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby born4law » Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:01 pm

Did anyone have an LR section with a question about computer chips (speed, size, sophistication)? Was this the experimental?

ppl123
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:02 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby ppl123 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:14 pm

I messaged you.


born4law wrote:Did anyone have an LR section with a question about computer chips (speed, size, sophistication)? Was this the experimental?

User avatar
Oprah Winfrey
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:15 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby Oprah Winfrey » Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:18 pm

Does anyone know if the "first teacher" program question in LR was experimental or not? for some reason that question made me its bitch even after I went back to it :cry:




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bcapace, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 6 guests