LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby skri65 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:26 pm

Any idea which LR was experimental?
Delete if inappropriate.

User avatar
specialsnowflake
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:48 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby specialsnowflake » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:29 pm

This is relevant to my interests

User avatar
nygrrrl
Posts: 4948
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:01 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby nygrrrl » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:36 pm

Thanks, skri, for bringing up the topic of appropriateness. I'll leave this here as a reference.
(And no, you're good - you can debate which one was experimental just don't go into detail about the questions/answers.) Congrats on finishing the LSAT!

YCrevolution wrote:This is a warning. This is likely your only warning; you are unlikely to receive any further warnings.

Please be advised that discussion or solicitation (including, but not limited to, PMs and online chatrooms) of any questions or answers from the June 2012 LSAT with anything more than an extremely broad level of specificity will result in a temporary or permanent ban. This may include a permanent ban on your IPs if necessary, which will block you from even viewing the TLS forums. Permanent IP address bans for LSAT discussion have been issued in the past.

Examples have been included for your reference below. This is not an exhaustive list. It is not a defense to say that your overly-specific discussion of an LSAT question did not exactly mirror one of the examples - you will still be banned. Linking to other online materials/discussion of the LSAT questions is also prohibited.

Please note that you agreed not to discuss specific LSAT questions and answers when you completed your signing statement when taking the test. The LSAC considers it a violation to discuss specific questions and answers; the LSAC will act accordingly upon discovering discussion of specific questions and answers. Be advised that the LSAC and its agents monitor this board.

Analytical Reasoning Example wrote:1. Games were hard. Okay.
2. Yeah, on the second question for the second game, I wasn't sure if C was just on Tuesdays or Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Ban.
3. No, the order is ACDBBE. Ban.
4. What about Question Four? If C can't go on Tuesdays, then it has to be Wednesday right? Ban.
5. You guys are stupid. The answer to Question Four and Five is D. Ban.
6. No, the answers are CDAABE. Ban.
7. C'mon guys. How can you not know all of the answers? Ban.

Logical Reasoning Example wrote:1. I thought the LR sections weren't too difficult. Okay.
2. What answers did you all get for the coffee growers question? Ban.
3. I got A. Ban.
4. That's weird, I thought it was either B or D. Ban.
5. But it was a parallel reasoning problem. Ban.
6. Damn it, I knew I should have picked B. Ban.
7. Hold on guys, I think the mods might get upset if we keep this up. Never a good sign.
8. Let's trick them by disguising what we're saying. So, hypothetically, if I were a coffee grower..... Ban.
9. You would be displeased with government regulation of pesticides. Ban.
10. But not price controls. Ban.
11. Is that because, hypothetically, price controls would raise prices and revenue? Ban.
12. It's just a cost problem in general. If you were a coffee grower, the legal pesticides would, hypothetically, cost more. Ban.
13. Whoa, it's just like Question 13 from the second LR section in PT 39. Ban.
14. Guys, maybe we should create a chatroom to discuss this. I started one: tinychat.com/letscheatontheLSAT Ban.
15. If you guys could PM me about this, that'd be great. Ban.

Please note that this warning applies to the Reading Comprehension section as well as the writing sample.

If you are in doubt as to whether your drafted post will run afoul of this warning, do not submit the post. You have been warned.

User avatar
VUSisterRayVU
Posts: 162
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby VUSisterRayVU » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:47 pm

LG-RC-LR-LR-LG here

User avatar
lhanvt13
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby lhanvt13 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:50 pm

LR RC LR LR LG here I think sofa (2nd LR) and science fiction (3rd) were real

Is this an okay amount of info ? If it's too much please let me know and I'll delete this post ! :)
Last edited by lhanvt13 on Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby skri65 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:52 pm

lhanvt13 wrote:LR RC LR LR LG here I think sofa (2nd LR) and science fiction (3rd) were real


any basis for this?

square_peg
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:40 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby square_peg » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:53 pm

My exam was RC-LR-RC-LG-LR.

Ugh...at least the two reading sections weren't back-to-back. That would've killed me.

Ihanvt13 - I had both of those.
Last edited by square_peg on Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lhanvt13
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby lhanvt13 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:53 pm

skri65 wrote:
lhanvt13 wrote:LR RC LR LR LG here I think sofa (2nd LR) and science fiction (3rd) were real


any basis for this?


Friend had 2 LR of which each contained these

britcham
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:53 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby britcham » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:54 pm

.
Last edited by britcham on Fri Aug 01, 2014 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lhanvt13
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby lhanvt13 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:55 pm

square_peg wrote:My exam was RC-LR-RC-LG-LR.

Ugh...at least the two reading sections weren't back-to-back. That would've killed me.

Ihanvt13 - I had both of those.


Oh good god 2RCs are scary

square_peg
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:40 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby square_peg » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:57 pm

lhanvt13 wrote:
square_peg wrote:My exam was RC-LR-RC-LG-LR.

Ugh...at least the two reading sections weren't back-to-back. That would've killed me.

Ihanvt13 - I had both of those.


Oh good god 2RCs are scary


Yeah, I wasted the first three minutes of the second one freaking out about how I had two RC sections. I hope that one was experimental. XD

User avatar
lhanvt13
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby lhanvt13 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:59 pm

square_peg wrote:
lhanvt13 wrote:
square_peg wrote:My exam was RC-LR-RC-LG-LR.

Ugh...at least the two reading sections weren't back-to-back. That would've killed me.

Ihanvt13 - I had both of those.


Oh good god 2RCs are scary


Yeah, I wasted the first three minutes of the second one freaking out about how I had two RC sections. I hope that one was experimental. XD


Oh god the click (!) was so frustraiting to read .. Slowed me down so much haha kept thinking of russel peters

User avatar
princessofpower
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby princessofpower » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:01 pm

I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG too. I thought the 2nd LR was the experimental one

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby skri65 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:05 pm

princessofpower wrote:I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG too. I thought the 2nd LR was the experimental one


Be wrong. Please.

Swimp
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:32 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby Swimp » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:09 pm

I had the same order as the OP too. I actually thought the third one was probably experimental. Something about it just felt a little weird. But I thought I did about the same on all of them, so I don't really care which counted.

VasaVasori
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:36 pm

.

Postby VasaVasori » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:14 pm

.
Last edited by VasaVasori on Sat May 02, 2015 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Eberry
Posts: 12145
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:32 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby Eberry » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:19 pm

lhanvt13 wrote:
skri65 wrote:
lhanvt13 wrote:LR RC LR LR LG here I think sofa (2nd LR) and science fiction (3rd) were real


any basis for this?


Friend had 2 LR of which each contained these


I hope to sweet baby Jesus that you are right.


Someone verify this. Now.

jjrialva
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby jjrialva » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:21 pm

What RC did you get?

User avatar
Grazzhoppa
Posts: 218
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 11:00 am

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby Grazzhoppa » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:22 pm

3rd LR was so strange. How could it not be experimental?

Nolita Fairytale
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:59 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby Nolita Fairytale » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:22 pm

Eberry wrote:
lhanvt13 wrote:
skri65 wrote:
lhanvt13 wrote:LR RC LR LR LG here I think sofa (2nd LR) and science fiction (3rd) were real


any basis for this?


Friend had 2 LR of which each contained these


I hope to sweet baby Jesus that you are right.


Someone verify this. Now.


Verified.

User avatar
05062014
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:05 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby 05062014 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:23 pm

If the 26 q lr 1 was experimental and the two 25q ones after it counted I may be able to keep the tears from flowing quite so rapidly jk but lr 1 - exp yes ?

Nolita Fairytale
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:59 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby Nolita Fairytale » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:25 pm

abdistotle wrote:If the 26 q lr 1 was experimental and the two 25q ones after it counted I may be able to keep the tears from flowing quite so rapidly jk but lr 1 - exp yes ?


If it had 26 q's, yes.

User avatar
allthatyouvegot
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:22 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby allthatyouvegot » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:26 pm

The only thing I remember about the LR I thought was experimental was there was a question towards the end about suspects. Does anyone else remember/not remember this? I remember sofas and science fiction but I can't for the life of me remember what section each of those were.

User avatar
05062014
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:05 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby 05062014 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:29 pm

Did anyone blank on the first game ? I legit blanked and I knew the 2nd game was way harder but I killed it and stayed on course until I only had 4 min left for game one. There were a few gimmes but my diagram was useless and I was processing all of the rules in my head. I realizedhhow simple of a diagram it needed to be in order for me to finish in the clutch as the proctor said pencils down

User avatar
HuskyHopeful
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:46 pm

Re: LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Postby HuskyHopeful » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:30 pm

The first question on the first game. I was losing my fucking mind and then it clicked and i killed it




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexandros, Baidu [Spider], Bob loblaw law blog, mstatelawdawg, Tazewell and 19 guests