50's and Higher LR vs Earlier LR Forum
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
50's and Higher LR vs Earlier LR
Seems to be a consensus that LR in the 50's and higher is a bit more tricky. How much more tricky? Is a LR score in the 40's really less representative to any appreciable extent?
- CyanIdes Of March
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: 50's and Higher LR vs Earlier LR
I don't really agree with that. I've been doing about the same (-0 to -2) on 50s as I did before hand. The first 10 - 20 PTs have some noticeably weird questions but since then it's all pretty standard.
- DSman
- Posts: 1385
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:27 am
Re: 50's and Higher LR vs Earlier LR
I thought the consensus was that the newer LR was actually more clear and somewhat easier? Honestly, I haven't found all that much difference. The newer tests seem somewhat easier for LR but its not much. I would say that if you are doing good on the pre 50s LR, you would also do well on the ones after.
You should take a look at a few of the new ones though just to be sure.
You should take a look at a few of the new ones though just to be sure.
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:50 pm
Re: 50's and Higher LR vs Earlier LR
I tend to miss the same amount (-2 to -4) but I think the newer ones take longer. I tend to finish most the old ones in 28 minutes or so
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: 50's and Higher LR vs Earlier LR
They're definitely trickier in the higher numbers that the entire question will rely on one word. Start to be a lot more careful in terms of the word choice that they pick, because you understanding of THE law vs A law can make or break a question.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login