Prep 22, Section 2 #18

Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:28 am

Prep 22, Section 2 #18

Postby soyeonjeon » Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:51 am

Prep 22, Section 2 #18

Why would E not suffice as an answer?
Also I find it sorta difficult to spot that B is an answer.

User avatar
CyanIdes Of March
Posts: 745
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: Prep 22, Section 2 #18

Postby CyanIdes Of March » Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:04 am

B works because it states that the work is original but not far-reaching, so it's not great, as it lacks a characteristic stated in the premise for greatness. E introduces a new characteristic for greatness that is not stated in the premise, broad-appeal.

User avatar
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 1:56 pm

Re: Prep 22, Section 2 #18

Postby jitsubruin » Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:25 pm

What CyanIdes said. I diagrammed it like this:

TG---->O & FI

The contrapositive would be ~O or ~FI----->~TG

The Contrapositive is exactly what answer choice B says.

E introduces a new condition.

User avatar
Posts: 524
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: Prep 22, Section 2 #18

Postby boblawlob » Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:21 pm

E is wrong because it introduces a 3rd necessary condition is not proven by the principle in the stim.

Here's a tip for principle questions: If the stim has a principle structured somewhat as "A always has B and C" or similarly "To be A, one must have B and C" could instantly predict that the answer has to be in the contrapositive form of the principle...because an answer choice that structured to say "This has B and C. So it must be A" is going against the logic chain; now a correct answer choice could say "We have A. So we must also have B and C," but that is almost never an option for us as an answer choice.

That might have sounded somewhat confusing...

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chargers21, detwings123, Exabot [Bot], Par0lEvid3nce and 3 guests