PT #5, Section 2, LG #1

Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 11:33 pm

PT #5, Section 2, LG #1

Postby lifeprincess13 » Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:32 pm

I simply do not get this game...any help please?

bp shinners
Posts: 3091
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:05 pm

Re: PT #5, Section 2, LG #1

Postby bp shinners » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:27 pm

So this is a rather ...non-traditional ordering game. You're used to days of the week/numbers as the base, but here we're going to use the grades. So my players are:

And my setup looks like:
__ __ __ __||__

That break is to remind me that an E is the only failing grade.

At this point, I notice two things: 1) It doesn't tell me that he receives each grade at least once, and 2) he's got 6 classes, but there are only 5 grades, so he's going to get the same grade in at least 2 classes.

1) GP - that's a block, but it's reversible (I can't represent that well in text)
2) IR - same as the last rule; reversible block
3) E-H - that's an ordering rule
4) G-P - ditto from #3

Quick one, I see that G and P are both in rules 1 and 4. That tells me my reversible block isn't reversible.

There are no other interactions between the rules, so I don't believe there are further deductions, and I don't see any good basis for scenarios. I check my questions real quick and see they're all conditional - that's what I'd expect if there were no deductions/good scenarios, so I'm good to go.

See if you can get through the questions with that. Be careful, though - this one preys on you wanting to set things up with different grades, but remember that the grades CAN overlap.

User avatar
CyanIdes Of March
Posts: 745
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: PT #5, Section 2, LG #1

Postby CyanIdes Of March » Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:59 pm

Yep, I remember this game. I couldn't understand what it was asking either. Only game I've ever looked at for 10 minute without even approaching the finish line. ~7 Minute of "What the hell is this?", 3 minutes of struggling through a few questions, then decided to just drop it because it didn't even seem relevant to modern games.

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: King of the North, Tape Dog and 5 guests