prep 27, section 1, # 17.

soyeonjeon
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:28 am

prep 27, section 1, # 17.

Postby soyeonjeon » Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:37 am

Why would E not suffice as an answer?

Thanks.

User avatar
CyanIdes Of March
Posts: 743
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: prep 27, section 1, # 17.

Postby CyanIdes Of March » Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:15 am

Because the argument does not presuppose it, it offers a chain of logical reasoning to support it's argument and that sentence is the last in its support of the conclusion offered at the beginning of the question.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BobBoblaw, m052310, Tazewell, Yahoo [Bot] and 9 guests