PT 17, Section 2, #21

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.

Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

PT 17, Section 2, #21

Postby BillsFan9907 » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:02 pm

I'm having some trouble rejecting E. If E weren't true, then it's possible that there are some fault lines that do not have earthquakes period. If that's the case, it looks like the author's argument is ruined as there are locations (near fault lines and in general) that are less likely to be hit by an earthquake. Please walk me through this.

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests