Wow! So I'm just seeing these all now. Just got done at work. Will definitely be reading this in the AM.
@nmop_apisdn- I did read your first reply (the first part). Thank you for being considerate- I know that it's tough for text comments to accurately represent our expressions and what we're trying to get across- so no worries. And thank you very much for your detailed response.
Will be reading it over coffee tomorrow morning.
Quick Conditional Inference Question Forum
- Captain Rodeo
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:14 pm
- Cerebro
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:22 pm
Re: Quick Conditional Inference Question
TERS wrote:Well, this is embarrassing.
- Captain Rodeo
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:14 pm
Re: Quick Conditional Inference Question
Hey, nmop_apisdn, thank you for all of the responses. Ya, I've come across a few AC's in some PTs (like 45-1-25, (B)) where that is a valid form. I think I read it before on LSATBlog. Hope studies are going well!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login