PT 9, Section 2, #10

User avatar
ccordero
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 3:14 pm

PT 9, Section 2, #10

Postby ccordero » Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:50 pm

Can anyone explain to me why the answer is B and not A? I was able to easily rule out C D and E but I wasn't sure what my thought process should have been (how to evaluate the answer choices) to be able to answer with B correctly.

VasaVasori
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:36 pm

.

Postby VasaVasori » Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:58 pm

.
Last edited by VasaVasori on Sat May 02, 2015 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

bp shinners
Posts: 3091
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:05 pm

Re: PT 9, Section 2, #10

Postby bp shinners » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:58 am

VasaVasori wrote:If airlines were required to remove all seats that restrict access to emergency exits, what would be the point in requiring them to buy only planes with unrestricted access to emergency exits? After all, when they buy planes that have restricted access to emergency exits, they're just going to have to remove those seats that restrict the access anyway.


Exactly right. Check the prompt again - it asks which proposal will IMPROVE the prospects of accomplishing the goal. Whether they purchase planes with the seats removed or remove the seats themselves, the outcome is the same.

User avatar
ccordero
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 3:14 pm

Re: PT 9, Section 2, #10

Postby ccordero » Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:28 pm

Thanks guys for the tips! I understand it better now. :)

User avatar
TDragon
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: PT 9, Section 2, #10

Postby TDragon » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:27 pm

Haha this was killing me as well lol, I'm happy I wasn't the only one who was wondering about this.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexandros, dj9i27, Google [Bot], Instrumental, Tazewell and 4 guests