Top Law Schools

Owning renting question sucked balls if I recall correctly

jigglebottom wrote:Owning renting question sucked balls if I recall correctly

I think/pray I got that one

jigglebottom wrote:Owning renting question sucked balls if I recall correctly

and not the type of balls you'd want to suck

I think we both correctly chose the convoluted answer that was not among the obvious ones.. (too much?)

Also I was straight brute forcing those games...made not one single deducution....it was horrendous..threw everything I learned out the window...but I think I did okay

So we've figured out that the LR section with the crazy questions about early life on earth and amino acids was a real section? Fuck.

UtilityMonster wrote:

Br3v wrote:What the heck is this red panda

Yeah wtf?! I had LR LR RC LR LG and I dont remember anything with red pandas. I'm still wondering which of my LR's was the experimental.

Does anyone know if the dinosaur mineral fossils and mud tracks Q was in a graded or experimental section?

lt has been firmly established that the LR with the two two-question stimuli was experimental, correct? There were obviously multiple LR experimentals, though, because some had two 26 Q LRs.

I Had LR LR RC LR LG, 25 25 27 26 23. The first LR seemed like normal questions but was very easy. I finished with 5 minutes left on it and usually finish with just a minute on LR. The second one was the most difficult of my test and the questions seemed weird. The back to back multi-question stimuli seemed odd to me, since I don't think there have been too many of those in recent tests.

dsb83 wrote:lt has been firmly established that the LR with the two two-question stimuli was experimental, correct? There were obviously multiple LR experimentals, though, because some had two 26 Q LRs.

I Had LR LR RC LR LG, 25 25 27 26 23. The first LR seemed like normal questions but was very easy. I finished with 5 minutes left on it and usually finish with just a minute on LR. The second one was the most difficult of my test and the questions seemed weird. The back to back multi-question stimuli seemed odd to me, since I don't think there have been too many of those in recent tests.

Yes, i had the same test. I thought all sections of the LR were easy, although i agree the experimental section 2 was weird, so it's not surprising that was the experimental. They used to have the back to back stimulus questions but not for about 10 years or more i believe. Overall the reading i felt rushed on, but i didnt think it was hard, the last LG about musical solos i completely guessed on, had no idea what to do with that one

summer4627 wrote:

dsb83 wrote:lt has been firmly established that the LR with the two two-question stimuli was experimental, correct? There were obviously multiple LR experimentals, though, because some had two 26 Q LRs.

I Had LR LR RC LR LG, 25 25 27 26 23. The first LR seemed like normal questions but was very easy. I finished with 5 minutes left on it and usually finish with just a minute on LR. The second one was the most difficult of my test and the questions seemed weird. The back to back multi-question stimuli seemed odd to me, since I don't think there have been too many of those in recent tests.

Yes, i had the same test. I thought all sections of the LR were easy, although i agree the experimental section 2 was weird, so it's not surprising that was the experimental. They used to have the back to back stimulus questions but not for about 10 years or more i believe. Overall the reading i felt rushed on, but i didnt think it was hard, the last LG about musical solos i completely guessed on, had no idea what to do with that one

Your experience sounds a lot like mine. I was very rushed on the LAST RC passage. I think I did the whole it in about 6 minutes, and I didn't really grasp the details. The last LG was doable for me, but I again ran short on time. Feeling like I probably had -0 on the two LRs feels good, though.

Br3v wrote:

jigglebottom wrote:Owning renting question sucked balls if I recall correctly

I think/pray I got that one

That was one of those questions that takes forever to figure out but seems really obvious once you identify the crucial factor. I'm really not a fan of that kind of question, though. Probably my worst type.

Amino acids was a brow-wrinkler but I felt like four of the answers were totally, completely wrong, so it worked out.

Ninjas was cool. Meerkats, cool. I even kinda dug CPUs. Amphibians, not so much.

LR-LR-RC-LR-LG, by the way, which was NOT the order I would've preferred. I was a little fried by games, which are usually my strongest section.

Shasha Dew Dew wrote:Hmmmm, if my memory serves me well I recall all those,

Pluto, Red Panda, Land Fills/REcycling and hydrogen etc. all were all together and were my last LR 5
Does Red Panda as the finale in LR 5 ring a bell to you?

max55 wrote:

Shasha Dew Dew wrote:I recall Pluto and Panda's together, no???

Matter of fact, wasn't Pluto, CPU and Red Panda all together??

max55 wrote:Pluto was real. Not experimental. (26 question section.)

I thought Pluto was in the same section as hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen...not w/ CPU. I don't remember Red Panda at all. Do you remember a question about recycling and landfills?

I was also RC LR LR LG LR and the last LR was the only one where I didn't get to read the choices to the final question. I distinctly remember sorting through red panda answer choices.

But based on the reply a few posts above mine, it looks like the order was all switched up anyways. I know that either the 2nd or 5th LR was experimental in mine, as both of them had 26 questions. Which sucks because I didn't do as well with the 3rd one.

For me,
LR1 = dino/mud/carcasses/tracks
LR2 = Don't really remember much...
LR3 = pluto

I'm pretty sure the dino/mud/carcasses/tracks one was the experimental...

Amino acid made no sense.