RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???) Forum
- jigglebottom
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:00 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
Owning renting question sucked balls if I recall correctly
- Br3v
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
I think/pray I got that onejigglebottom wrote:Owning renting question sucked balls if I recall correctly
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
and not the type of balls you'd want to suckjigglebottom wrote:Owning renting question sucked balls if I recall correctly
- jigglebottom
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:00 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
I think we both correctly chose the convoluted answer that was not among the obvious ones.. (too much?)
Also I was straight brute forcing those games...made not one single deducution....it was horrendous..threw everything I learned out the window...but I think I did okay
Also I was straight brute forcing those games...made not one single deducution....it was horrendous..threw everything I learned out the window...but I think I did okay
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:02 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
So we've figured out that the LR section with the crazy questions about early life on earth and amino acids was a real section? Fuck.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:48 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
Yeah wtf?! I had LR LR RC LR LG and I dont remember anything with red pandas. I'm still wondering which of my LR's was the experimental.UtilityMonster wrote:Br3v wrote:What the heck is this red panda
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 7:26 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
Does anyone know if the dinosaur mineral fossils and mud tracks Q was in a graded or experimental section?
- dsb83
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:57 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
lt has been firmly established that the LR with the two two-question stimuli was experimental, correct? There were obviously multiple LR experimentals, though, because some had two 26 Q LRs.
I Had LR LR RC LR LG, 25 25 27 26 23. The first LR seemed like normal questions but was very easy. I finished with 5 minutes left on it and usually finish with just a minute on LR. The second one was the most difficult of my test and the questions seemed weird. The back to back multi-question stimuli seemed odd to me, since I don't think there have been too many of those in recent tests.
I Had LR LR RC LR LG, 25 25 27 26 23. The first LR seemed like normal questions but was very easy. I finished with 5 minutes left on it and usually finish with just a minute on LR. The second one was the most difficult of my test and the questions seemed weird. The back to back multi-question stimuli seemed odd to me, since I don't think there have been too many of those in recent tests.
- summer4627
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:01 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
Yes, i had the same test. I thought all sections of the LR were easy, although i agree the experimental section 2 was weird, so it's not surprising that was the experimental. They used to have the back to back stimulus questions but not for about 10 years or more i believe. Overall the reading i felt rushed on, but i didnt think it was hard, the last LG about musical solos i completely guessed on, had no idea what to do with that onedsb83 wrote:lt has been firmly established that the LR with the two two-question stimuli was experimental, correct? There were obviously multiple LR experimentals, though, because some had two 26 Q LRs.
I Had LR LR RC LR LG, 25 25 27 26 23. The first LR seemed like normal questions but was very easy. I finished with 5 minutes left on it and usually finish with just a minute on LR. The second one was the most difficult of my test and the questions seemed weird. The back to back multi-question stimuli seemed odd to me, since I don't think there have been too many of those in recent tests.
- dsb83
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:57 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
Your experience sounds a lot like mine. I was very rushed on the LAST RC passage. I think I did the whole it in about 6 minutes, and I didn't really grasp the details. The last LG was doable for me, but I again ran short on time. Feeling like I probably had -0 on the two LRs feels good, though.summer4627 wrote:Yes, i had the same test. I thought all sections of the LR were easy, although i agree the experimental section 2 was weird, so it's not surprising that was the experimental. They used to have the back to back stimulus questions but not for about 10 years or more i believe. Overall the reading i felt rushed on, but i didnt think it was hard, the last LG about musical solos i completely guessed on, had no idea what to do with that onedsb83 wrote:lt has been firmly established that the LR with the two two-question stimuli was experimental, correct? There were obviously multiple LR experimentals, though, because some had two 26 Q LRs.
I Had LR LR RC LR LG, 25 25 27 26 23. The first LR seemed like normal questions but was very easy. I finished with 5 minutes left on it and usually finish with just a minute on LR. The second one was the most difficult of my test and the questions seemed weird. The back to back multi-question stimuli seemed odd to me, since I don't think there have been too many of those in recent tests.
- smashingrobface
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:46 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
That was one of those questions that takes forever to figure out but seems really obvious once you identify the crucial factor. I'm really not a fan of that kind of question, though. Probably my worst type.Br3v wrote:I think/pray I got that onejigglebottom wrote:Owning renting question sucked balls if I recall correctly
Amino acids was a brow-wrinkler but I felt like four of the answers were totally, completely wrong, so it worked out.
Ninjas was cool. Meerkats, cool. I even kinda dug CPUs. Amphibians, not so much.
LR-LR-RC-LR-LG, by the way, which was NOT the order I would've preferred. I was a little fried by games, which are usually my strongest section.
- sjwest
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:53 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
I was also RC LR LR LG LR and the last LR was the only one where I didn't get to read the choices to the final question. I distinctly remember sorting through red panda answer choices.Shasha Dew Dew wrote:Hmmmm, if my memory serves me well I recall all those,
Pluto, Red Panda, Land Fills/REcycling and hydrogen etc. all were all together and were my last LR 5
Does Red Panda as the finale in LR 5 ring a bell to you?
max55 wrote:I thought Pluto was in the same section as hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen...not w/ CPU. I don't remember Red Panda at all. Do you remember a question about recycling and landfills?Shasha Dew Dew wrote:I recall Pluto and Panda's together, no???
Matter of fact, wasn't Pluto, CPU and Red Panda all together??
max55 wrote:Pluto was real. Not experimental. (26 question section.)
- sjwest
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:53 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
But based on the reply a few posts above mine, it looks like the order was all switched up anyways. I know that either the 2nd or 5th LR was experimental in mine, as both of them had 26 questions. Which sucks because I didn't do as well with the 3rd one.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Emmie
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
For me,
LR1 = dino/mud/carcasses/tracks
LR2 = Don't really remember much...
LR3 = pluto
I'm pretty sure the dino/mud/carcasses/tracks one was the experimental...
LR1 = dino/mud/carcasses/tracks
LR2 = Don't really remember much...
LR3 = pluto
I'm pretty sure the dino/mud/carcasses/tracks one was the experimental...
- princeR
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:10 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG-LR (experimental???)
Amino acid made no sense.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login