LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

bloynoys
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:34 am

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby bloynoys » Wed Jun 13, 2012 4:07 am

I had this configuration, 25-25-26 on the LRs. The first section had a question about talk theropy which was number 4 or 5. I just remember that question since it was the one I couldn't figure out, did others have this question in their real sections?

Glaucon
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby Glaucon » Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:01 pm

I recall the therapy question and if you are implying that this question was in either of the two 25questioned sections, then that section in question is REAL. I'm deducing this from the facts that I only had 1 25 questioned section and remember a question with respect to therapy.

Glaucon
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby Glaucon » Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:02 pm

The real LR section with 26 questions had for its last question something about unyielding people accusing/name-calling each other.

unitball
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 12:37 am

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby unitball » Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:13 pm

^ I remember reading that stim twice and I had no idea what the hell it was trying to say. I guessed the FUCK out of that question. (made me mad)

pittman000
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:38 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby pittman000 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:25 pm

Does anyone know if the section with 2 ?s per prompt had 25 questions?

User avatar
Br3v
Posts: 4174
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby Br3v » Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:32 pm

Did everyone with this format have a redpanda question

Also question stems that had two answers for it?

I had the other LR x 3 set up and lacked both mentioned above (I think)

User avatar
RSterling
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby RSterling » Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:41 pm

I had 25-26-26. My third LR was the one with ninjas and pluto which was confirmed to be real by people in the waiting thread. It also sounds like everyone had an LR with 25 Q's. Looks to me like 2nd LR was the exp.

pittman000
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:38 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby pittman000 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 4:08 pm

Yeah I had a very similar one and think my exp. was 2, but dont remeber if it was 26 ?s. Did anyone else think the logic games were tough to find deductions/took to much time to find deductions.

Glaucon
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby Glaucon » Wed Jun 13, 2012 4:45 pm

It may be possible that the order of the experimental section was switched between the 2nd and 3rd sections for some. I do believe I had the pluto question in my SECOND LR section, making my third experimental... Does anybody remember stubborn unyielding people accusing/name-calling one another? This was the last question for my second LR section.

mmhazzie24
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:26 am

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby mmhazzie24 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:37 pm

suzige wrote:For some reason I want to say my second LR was 25. But I could be imagining things in my strained effort to recall.


I'm pretty sure I had LR (25) LR (25) LR (26)

Glaucon
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby Glaucon » Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:33 pm

Different peoples received different LR exp sections with different numbers of questions.

User avatar
jigglebottom
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:00 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby jigglebottom » Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:58 pm

So that semi-tough bacteria question in one of the LRs.. showed up number 5? real or fake....

suzige
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby suzige » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:34 pm

I'm still debating on canceling... I had this test arrangement, and I don't feel confident with any of my sections. Any advice?

suzige
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby suzige » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:35 pm

Also... I saw no red pandas.

User avatar
CardozoLaw09
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby CardozoLaw09 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:53 pm

suzige wrote:Also... I saw no red pandas.


I had 3 L/R sections and do not remember any red panda's either :?

suzige
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby suzige » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:55 pm

CardozoLaw09 wrote:
suzige wrote:Also... I saw no red pandas.


I had 3 L/R sections and do not remember any red panda's either :?


What were your feelings about the LR sections? Did they seem a little off to you? My timing was so messed up because a few of the first 15 were taking me a while and I freaked out.

User avatar
CardozoLaw09
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby CardozoLaw09 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:02 pm

suzige wrote:
CardozoLaw09 wrote:
suzige wrote:Also... I saw no red pandas.


I had 3 L/R sections and do not remember any red panda's either :?


What were your feelings about the LR sections? Did they seem a little off to you? My timing was so messed up because a few of the first 15 were taking me a while and I freaked out.


Oh they definitely seemed off/weird/wtf is this/am i at the right place.. to me. Especially the 1st section.

User avatar
jigglebottom
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:00 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby jigglebottom » Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:08 pm

Seemed pretty standard to me.... there were a few that were "off" but that happens on every test no? I had three lrs as well... games were a little funky.. not necessarily hard, but funky.

suzige
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby suzige » Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:47 pm

CardozoLaw09 wrote:
suzige wrote:
CardozoLaw09 wrote:
suzige wrote:Also... I saw no red pandas.


I had 3 L/R sections and do not remember any red panda's either :?


What were your feelings about the LR sections? Did they seem a little off to you? My timing was so messed up because a few of the first 15 were taking me a while and I freaked out.


Oh they definitely seemed off/weird/wtf is this/am i at the right place.. to me. Especially the 1st section.


The first section also threw me the most. Do you think it was experimental? I don't remember any of the question types for it...

User avatar
CardozoLaw09
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby CardozoLaw09 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:57 pm

I think the 1st one was for real :(

suzige
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby suzige » Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:58 pm

no :cry:

lilhugsy24
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:48 am

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby lilhugsy24 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:12 pm

RSterling wrote:I had 25-26-26. My third LR was the one with ninjas and pluto which was confirmed to be real by people in the waiting thread. It also sounds like everyone had an LR with 25 Q's. Looks to me like 2nd LR was the exp.


Think we had the same test. Did your LR have the AC with the guy with the injury getting surgery or whatever I think it was the second LR....Was that the experimental section or was that the same section as the Pluto and ninjas question?




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests