Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

User avatar
Clearly
Posts: 4165
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby Clearly » Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:15 pm

chup wrote:
Clearlynotstefan wrote:To be fair, discussing the content of the passages is not inherently illegal, as the passages are excerpts from other published works... Using that information to undermine the validity of the test is wrong, but in itself direct quotation of actual RC passages isn't by default illegal...to my knowledge at least.

That said, I don't participate in discussing the test, I prefer to play it safe, and most importantly I signed a document saying I wouldn't, and I'd hate to base the rest of my legal career on a lie.

This is an internet forum and we are not police officers. "Illegality" is not the standard for what's kosher and what's not.

I'm not responding to whats "kosher", I'm responding to the constant threats of legal prosecution made by security personnel representing the LSAC.

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:31 pm

dsb83 wrote:Without specifics has been acceptable in the past. The real RC contained a passages about a Clinton blackness commentator and slamming particles together. Hope that helps.


Another thread says the exact opposite thing... hmmm

User avatar
Br3v
Posts: 4174
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby Br3v » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:33 pm

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Without specifics has been acceptable in the past. The real RC contained a passages about a Clinton blackness commentator and slamming particles together. Hope that helps.


Another thread says the exact opposite thing... hmmm


I recall no Clinton blackness

User avatar
dsb83
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:57 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby dsb83 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:18 pm

Br3v wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Without specifics has been acceptable in the past. The real RC contained a passages about a Clinton blackness commentator and slamming particles together. Hope that helps.


Another thread says the exact opposite thing... hmmm


I recall no Clinton blackness


As you should not. I said Clinton blackness commentator. She was in there, along with the particle business.

User avatar
SaintsTheMetal
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:08 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby SaintsTheMetal » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:22 pm

dsb83 wrote:
Br3v wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Without specifics has been acceptable in the past. The real RC contained a passages about a Clinton blackness commentator and slamming particles together. Hope that helps.


Another thread says the exact opposite thing... hmmm


I recall no Clinton blackness


As you should not. I said Clinton blackness commentator. She was in there, along with the particle business.


idk wtf Clinton blackness commentator is.. but real RC had digital books, nuclear fission, fingerprints, and jazz

User avatar
dsb83
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:57 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby dsb83 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:25 pm

Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.

User avatar
SaintsTheMetal
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:08 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby SaintsTheMetal » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:32 pm

dsb83 wrote:Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.


You're right, it was about Jazz big woop. Still no fuckin clue what Clinton Blackness is and what it has to do with the LSAT

User avatar
Icculus
Posts: 1421
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:02 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby Icculus » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:36 pm

SaintsTheMetal wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.


You're right, it was about Jazz big woop. Still no fuckin clue what Clinton Blackness is and what it has to do with the LSAT


Well Bill Clinton did claim to be the first black president when he was elected, maybe the two are connected. That's all I keep thinking when I read this.

honeycomb
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 10:26 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby honeycomb » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:37 pm

SaintsTheMetal wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.


You're right, it was about Jazz big woop. Still no fuckin clue what Clinton Blackness is and what it has to do with the LSAT


^ this

Clinton Blackness what the heck??

User avatar
Wily
Posts: 280
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:35 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby Wily » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:58 pm

honeycomb wrote:
SaintsTheMetal wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.


You're right, it was about Jazz big woop. Still no fuckin clue what Clinton Blackness is and what it has to do with the LSAT


^ this

Clinton Blackness what the heck??


Toni Morrison was the one who called Clinton the "first black president." :lol:

User avatar
PotatoMonkey
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:06 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby PotatoMonkey » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Sorry for beating a dead horse, but apparently the double RC has ruined all further comprehension for me for the day, and I won't be able to sleep until I'm sure, the experimental didn't have anything regarding jazz or Jazz, correct?

User avatar
NYC2012
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:47 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby NYC2012 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:01 pm

SaintsTheMetal wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.


You're right, it was about Jazz big woop. Still no fuckin clue what Clinton Blackness is and what it has to do with the LSAT


hahahahahahahahah died laughing at this post

ETA: I think i'm delirious. time to get off TLS

User avatar
NYC2012
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:47 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby NYC2012 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:04 pm

PotatoMonkey wrote:Sorry for beating a dead horse, but apparently the double RC has ruined all further comprehension for me for the day, and I won't be able to sleep until I'm sure, the experimental didn't have anything regarding jazz or Jazz, correct?


Jazz was real.

User avatar
PotatoMonkey
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:06 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby PotatoMonkey » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:06 pm

Dear God, thanks. I goofed the experimental. TIME TO SLEEP.

Manhattan LSAT Noah
Posts: 746
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:43 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby Manhattan LSAT Noah » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:08 pm

NYC2012 wrote:Jazz was real.
and then came Kenny G.

cgw
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:06 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Postby cgw » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:19 pm

honeycomb wrote:
SaintsTheMetal wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.


You're right, it was about Jazz big woop. Still no fuckin clue what Clinton Blackness is and what it has to do with the LSAT


^ this

Clinton Blackness what the heck??


http://Error.com/6wqospy

I only post it because Morrison is a beautiful writer.
Jazz
is a great book, but I've always preferred
Song of Solomon
.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests