Anybody know which RC was not the experimental? Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar
Clearly

Gold
Posts: 4189
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by Clearly » Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:15 pm

aschup wrote:
Clearlynotstefan wrote:To be fair, discussing the content of the passages is not inherently illegal, as the passages are excerpts from other published works... Using that information to undermine the validity of the test is wrong, but in itself direct quotation of actual RC passages isn't by default illegal...to my knowledge at least.

That said, I don't participate in discussing the test, I prefer to play it safe, and most importantly I signed a document saying I wouldn't, and I'd hate to base the rest of my legal career on a lie.
This is an internet forum and we are not police officers. "Illegality" is not the standard for what's kosher and what's not.
I'm not responding to whats "kosher", I'm responding to the constant threats of legal prosecution made by security personnel representing the LSAC.

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute

Gold
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by ManOfTheMinute » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:31 pm

dsb83 wrote:Without specifics has been acceptable in the past. The real RC contained a passages about a Clinton blackness commentator and slamming particles together. Hope that helps.
Another thread says the exact opposite thing... hmmm

User avatar
Br3v

Gold
Posts: 4290
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by Br3v » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:33 pm

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Without specifics has been acceptable in the past. The real RC contained a passages about a Clinton blackness commentator and slamming particles together. Hope that helps.
Another thread says the exact opposite thing... hmmm
I recall no Clinton blackness

User avatar
dsb83

Bronze
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:57 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by dsb83 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:18 pm

Br3v wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Without specifics has been acceptable in the past. The real RC contained a passages about a Clinton blackness commentator and slamming particles together. Hope that helps.
Another thread says the exact opposite thing... hmmm
I recall no Clinton blackness
As you should not. I said Clinton blackness commentator. She was in there, along with the particle business.

User avatar
SaintsTheMetal

Bronze
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:08 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by SaintsTheMetal » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:22 pm

dsb83 wrote:
Br3v wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Without specifics has been acceptable in the past. The real RC contained a passages about a Clinton blackness commentator and slamming particles together. Hope that helps.
Another thread says the exact opposite thing... hmmm
I recall no Clinton blackness
As you should not. I said Clinton blackness commentator. She was in there, along with the particle business.
idk wtf Clinton blackness commentator is.. but real RC had digital books, nuclear fission, fingerprints, and jazz

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
dsb83

Bronze
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:57 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by dsb83 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:25 pm

Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.

User avatar
SaintsTheMetal

Bronze
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:08 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by SaintsTheMetal » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:32 pm

dsb83 wrote:Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.
You're right, it was about Jazz big woop. Still no fuckin clue what Clinton Blackness is and what it has to do with the LSAT

User avatar
Icculus

Silver
Posts: 1410
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:02 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by Icculus » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:36 pm

SaintsTheMetal wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.
You're right, it was about Jazz big woop. Still no fuckin clue what Clinton Blackness is and what it has to do with the LSAT
Well Bill Clinton did claim to be the first black president when he was elected, maybe the two are connected. That's all I keep thinking when I read this.

honeycomb

New
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 10:26 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by honeycomb » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:37 pm

SaintsTheMetal wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.
You're right, it was about Jazz big woop. Still no fuckin clue what Clinton Blackness is and what it has to do with the LSAT
^ this

Clinton Blackness what the heck??

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Wily

Bronze
Posts: 280
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:35 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by Wily » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:58 pm

honeycomb wrote:
SaintsTheMetal wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.
You're right, it was about Jazz big woop. Still no fuckin clue what Clinton Blackness is and what it has to do with the LSAT
^ this

Clinton Blackness what the heck??
Toni Morrison was the one who called Clinton the "first black president." :lol:

User avatar
PotatoMonkey

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:06 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by PotatoMonkey » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:59 pm

Sorry for beating a dead horse, but apparently the double RC has ruined all further comprehension for me for the day, and I won't be able to sleep until I'm sure, the experimental didn't have anything regarding jazz or Jazz, correct?

NYC2012

Bronze
Posts: 272
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:47 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by NYC2012 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:01 pm

.
Last edited by NYC2012 on Sun Dec 24, 2017 8:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

NYC2012

Bronze
Posts: 272
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:47 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by NYC2012 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:04 pm

.
Last edited by NYC2012 on Sun Dec 24, 2017 8:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
PotatoMonkey

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:06 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by PotatoMonkey » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:06 pm

Dear God, thanks. I goofed the experimental. TIME TO SLEEP.

Manhattan LSAT Noah

Silver
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:43 am

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by Manhattan LSAT Noah » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:08 pm

NYC2012 wrote: Jazz was real.
and then came Kenny G.

cgw

Bronze
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:06 pm

Re: Anybody know which RC was not the experimental?

Post by cgw » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:19 pm

honeycomb wrote:
SaintsTheMetal wrote:
dsb83 wrote:Jazz article wasn't primarily about jazz.
You're right, it was about Jazz big woop. Still no fuckin clue what Clinton Blackness is and what it has to do with the LSAT
^ this

Clinton Blackness what the heck??
http://tinyurl.com/6wqospy

I only post it because Morrison is a beautiful writer.
Jazz
is a great book, but I've always preferred
Song of Solomon
.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”