So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected? Forum

NewYorkL · Post by **NewYorkL** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:02 pm

How did it go?

TheThriller · Post by **TheThriller** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:15 pm

My avatar explains it.

lhanvt13 · Post by **lhanvt13** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:17 pm

I am a sad little boy right now :,(

Scotchandsoda · Post by **Scotchandsoda** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:20 pm

lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(

MillerTheThriller wrote:My avatar explains it.

damn bro, I'm sorry.

bp shinners · Post by **bp shinners** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:22 pm

lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(

Bad games? RC? All around? Anything weird? Anything stand out?

-Edit- Post 1000!

theprophet89 · Post by **theprophet89** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:24 pm

5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?

Helicio · Post by **Helicio** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:27 pm

That test did not seem like an LSAT.

No sure if it was hard or easy. I literally feel like I got anywhere from a 165-180. :/

lhanvt13 · Post by **lhanvt13** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:34 pm

bp shinners wrote:
lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(
Bad games? RC? All around? Anything weird? Anything stand out?

-Edit- Post 1000!

Usually games are my strong hold but I felt completely overwhelmed by this one . I usually get -0 and on abnormal circumstances -1. But man oh man did the one get me . Everything else was fine . RC was normal. LR was easier than previous.

TheThriller · Post by **TheThriller** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:34 pm

Same feeling exactly, different from every PT i've ever took, felt more like a test from the 20 PT range then the 60s

Post by **flem** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:35 pm

Did you guys see some mapping or pattern games or something?

Clearly · Post by **Clearly** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:37 pm

I suck at games and found them quite straightforward...

TheThriller · Post by **TheThriller** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:38 pm

Honestly I thought the LG was easy, for me, it was 1 very tough RC passage and very ambiguous LR. LR in my opinion was not the type of LR seen on the vast majority of other tests.

taboo · Post by **taboo** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:43 pm

Didn't go as I expected. The desks were super small. I didn't go so good on the LG section because the layout was different. I normally get -1 or -2 but now I think I got -8 or more

. I actually think I did better on the LR sections than I normally do. So I will absolutely retake in October or December. My score should be good enough to get me into the score I want to go to..but I know I can do alot better.

Perstephanie · Post by **Perstephanie** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:04 pm

The LG section totally blew, the (what seems to be non-experimental) RC section was a little iffy, but all the LR sections and the other RC section I had seemed really goddamn easy. I don't know why, and now I'm nervous. But yeah, I ran out of time on the LG section and just put "c" for like six answers. Sooooo, I probably bombed that one.

TheColonel · Post by **TheColonel** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:06 pm

I thought it was a bit easier than expected. I will agree that it felt "odd" but for me I think it was a good sort of oddness. Don't want to go into too many details, but I think I did well on games, well on one LR section and probably pretty well on the other two but not 100% sure.

sinisterkid · Post by **sinisterkid** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:07 pm

Started off ominously when a bro who only brought his student id became irate upon not being allowed to take the test, which delayed the start. Also, loud rain/thunder + weather sirens + poor lighting = FFFFFUUUUU.

NewYorkL · Post by **NewYorkL** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:25 pm

Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?

lsatprepguy · Post by **lsatprepguy** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:28 pm

NewYorkL wrote:Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?

not without getting banned

DaRascal · Post by **DaRascal** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:36 pm

I honestly think I went perfect on Games although I might have gotten that stupid "If this condition is replaced question" wrong.

If I don't get 165+ it's because of LR. Fuck LR.

TheThriller · Post by **TheThriller** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:37 pm

DaRascal wrote:I honestly think I went perfect on Games although I might have gotten that stupid "If this condition is replaced question" wrong.

If I don't get 165+ it's because of LR. Fuck LR.

agreed.

DaRascal · Post by **DaRascal** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:37 pm

NewYorkL wrote:Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?

Yes but it's confidential.

agcl0913 · Post by **agcl0913** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:52 pm

theprophet89 wrote:5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?

Yes - each LG got two pages. So much space to use I was overwhelmed. And confused when I opened the section.

automaticfortheppl · Post by **automaticfortheppl** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:54 pm

I don't love it...but I don't hate it.

shifty_eyed · Post by **shifty_eyed** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:55 pm

I thought the LR was EASY. Generally LR is my best section though.

There was one question on the RC that I'm dying to discuss.

Nova · Post by **Nova** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:55 pm

agcl0913 wrote:
theprophet89 wrote:5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?
Yes - each LG got two pages. So much space to use I was overwhelmed. And confused when I opened the section.

are you kidding? wtf?

So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected? Forum

So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Register for access!

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Register now!

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?