So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected? Forum
- NewYorkL
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 6:55 pm
So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
How did it go?
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
My avatar explains it.
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
I am a sad little boy right now :,(
- Scotchandsoda
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:09 am
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(
damn bro, I'm sorry.MillerTheThriller wrote:My avatar explains it.
-
- Posts: 3086
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:05 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
Bad games? RC? All around? Anything weird? Anything stand out?lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(
-Edit- Post 1000!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- theprophet89
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:06 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?
- Helicio
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:22 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
That test did not seem like an LSAT.
No sure if it was hard or easy. I literally feel like I got anywhere from a 165-180. :/
No sure if it was hard or easy. I literally feel like I got anywhere from a 165-180. :/
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
Usually games are my strong hold but I felt completely overwhelmed by this one . I usually get -0 and on abnormal circumstances -1. But man oh man did the one get me . Everything else was fine . RC was normal. LR was easier than previous.bp shinners wrote:Bad games? RC? All around? Anything weird? Anything stand out?lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(
-Edit- Post 1000!
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
Same feeling exactly, different from every PT i've ever took, felt more like a test from the 20 PT range then the 60s
- flem
- Posts: 12882
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:44 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
Did you guys see some mapping or pattern games or something?
Last edited by flem on Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
I suck at games and found them quite straightforward...
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
Honestly I thought the LG was easy, for me, it was 1 very tough RC passage and very ambiguous LR. LR in my opinion was not the type of LR seen on the vast majority of other tests.
- taboo
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:20 am
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
Didn't go as I expected. The desks were super small. I didn't go so good on the LG section because the layout was different. I normally get -1 or -2 but now I think I got -8 or more . I actually think I did better on the LR sections than I normally do. So I will absolutely retake in October or December. My score should be good enough to get me into the score I want to go to..but I know I can do alot better.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Perstephanie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:04 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
The LG section totally blew, the (what seems to be non-experimental) RC section was a little iffy, but all the LR sections and the other RC section I had seemed really goddamn easy. I don't know why, and now I'm nervous. But yeah, I ran out of time on the LG section and just put "c" for like six answers. Sooooo, I probably bombed that one.
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
I thought it was a bit easier than expected. I will agree that it felt "odd" but for me I think it was a good sort of oddness. Don't want to go into too many details, but I think I did well on games, well on one LR section and probably pretty well on the other two but not 100% sure.
- sinisterkid
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:09 am
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
Started off ominously when a bro who only brought his student id became irate upon not being allowed to take the test, which delayed the start. Also, loud rain/thunder + weather sirens + poor lighting = FFFFFUUUUU.
- NewYorkL
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 6:55 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- lsatprepguy
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:04 am
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
not without getting bannedNewYorkL wrote:Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?
- DaRascal
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
I honestly think I went perfect on Games although I might have gotten that stupid "If this condition is replaced question" wrong.
If I don't get 165+ it's because of LR. Fuck LR.
If I don't get 165+ it's because of LR. Fuck LR.
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
agreed.DaRascal wrote:I honestly think I went perfect on Games although I might have gotten that stupid "If this condition is replaced question" wrong.
If I don't get 165+ it's because of LR. Fuck LR.
- DaRascal
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
Yes but it's confidential.NewYorkL wrote:Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- agcl0913
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:49 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
Yes - each LG got two pages. So much space to use I was overwhelmed. And confused when I opened the section.theprophet89 wrote:5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?
- automaticfortheppl
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:05 am
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
I don't love it...but I don't hate it.
Last edited by automaticfortheppl on Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- shifty_eyed
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
I thought the LR was EASY. Generally LR is my best section though.
There was one question on the RC that I'm dying to discuss.
There was one question on the RC that I'm dying to discuss.
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?
are you kidding? wtf?agcl0913 wrote:Yes - each LG got two pages. So much space to use I was overwhelmed. And confused when I opened the section.theprophet89 wrote:5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login