So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

User avatar
NewYorkL
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 6:55 pm

So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby NewYorkL » Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:02 pm

How did it go?

User avatar
TheThriller
Posts: 2285
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby TheThriller » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:15 pm

My avatar explains it.

User avatar
lhanvt13
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby lhanvt13 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:17 pm

I am a sad little boy right now :,(

User avatar
Scotchandsoda
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:09 am

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby Scotchandsoda » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:20 pm

lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(
MillerTheThriller wrote:My avatar explains it.


:( damn bro, I'm sorry.

bp shinners
Posts: 3091
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:05 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby bp shinners » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:22 pm

lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(


Bad games? RC? All around? Anything weird? Anything stand out?

-Edit- Post 1000!

User avatar
theprophet89
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:06 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby theprophet89 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:24 pm

5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?

User avatar
Helicio
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:22 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby Helicio » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:27 pm

That test did not seem like an LSAT.

No sure if it was hard or easy. I literally feel like I got anywhere from a 165-180. :/

User avatar
lhanvt13
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby lhanvt13 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:34 pm

bp shinners wrote:
lhanvt13 wrote:I am a sad little boy right now :,(


Bad games? RC? All around? Anything weird? Anything stand out?

-Edit- Post 1000!


Usually games are my strong hold but I felt completely overwhelmed by this one . I usually get -0 and on abnormal circumstances -1. But man oh man did the one get me . Everything else was fine . RC was normal. LR was easier than previous.

User avatar
TheThriller
Posts: 2285
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby TheThriller » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:34 pm

Same feeling exactly, different from every PT i've ever took, felt more like a test from the 20 PT range then the 60s

User avatar
flem
Posts: 12949
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:44 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby flem » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:35 pm

Did you guys see some mapping or pattern games or something?
Last edited by flem on Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Clearly
Posts: 4166
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby Clearly » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:37 pm

I suck at games and found them quite straightforward...

User avatar
TheThriller
Posts: 2285
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby TheThriller » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:38 pm

Honestly I thought the LG was easy, for me, it was 1 very tough RC passage and very ambiguous LR. LR in my opinion was not the type of LR seen on the vast majority of other tests.

User avatar
taboo
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:20 am

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby taboo » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:43 pm

Didn't go as I expected. The desks were super small. I didn't go so good on the LG section because the layout was different. I normally get -1 or -2 but now I think I got -8 or more :(. I actually think I did better on the LR sections than I normally do. So I will absolutely retake in October or December. My score should be good enough to get me into the score I want to go to..but I know I can do alot better.

User avatar
Perstephanie
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:04 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby Perstephanie » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:04 pm

The LG section totally blew, the (what seems to be non-experimental) RC section was a little iffy, but all the LR sections and the other RC section I had seemed really goddamn easy. I don't know why, and now I'm nervous. But yeah, I ran out of time on the LG section and just put "c" for like six answers. Sooooo, I probably bombed that one.

TheColonel
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:44 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby TheColonel » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:06 pm

I thought it was a bit easier than expected. I will agree that it felt "odd" but for me I think it was a good sort of oddness. Don't want to go into too many details, but I think I did well on games, well on one LR section and probably pretty well on the other two but not 100% sure.

User avatar
sinisterkid
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:09 am

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby sinisterkid » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:07 pm

Started off ominously when a bro who only brought his student id became irate upon not being allowed to take the test, which delayed the start. Also, loud rain/thunder + weather sirens + poor lighting = FFFFFUUUUU.

User avatar
NewYorkL
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 6:55 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby NewYorkL » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:25 pm

Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?

User avatar
lsatprepguy
Posts: 163
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:04 am

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby lsatprepguy » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:28 pm

NewYorkL wrote:Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?


not without getting banned :lol:

User avatar
DaRascal
Posts: 1854
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby DaRascal » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:36 pm

I honestly think I went perfect on Games although I might have gotten that stupid "If this condition is replaced question" wrong.


If I don't get 165+ it's because of LR. Fuck LR. :evil:

User avatar
TheThriller
Posts: 2285
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby TheThriller » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:37 pm

DaRascal wrote:I honestly think I went perfect on Games although I might have gotten that stupid "If this condition is replaced question" wrong.


If I don't get 165+ it's because of LR. Fuck LR. :evil:


agreed.

User avatar
DaRascal
Posts: 1854
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby DaRascal » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:37 pm

NewYorkL wrote:Can anyone recall the LG types they saw on the test?


Yes but it's confidential. :mrgreen:

User avatar
agcl0913
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:49 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby agcl0913 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:52 pm

theprophet89 wrote:5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?


Yes - each LG got two pages. So much space to use I was overwhelmed. And confused when I opened the section.

User avatar
automaticfortheppl
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:05 am

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby automaticfortheppl » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:54 pm

I don't love it...but I don't hate it.
Last edited by automaticfortheppl on Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
shifty_eyed
Posts: 1934
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby shifty_eyed » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:55 pm

I thought the LR was EASY. Generally LR is my best section though.

There was one question on the RC that I'm dying to discuss.

User avatar
Nova
Posts: 9116
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: So How Was It? Hard? Harder? Just what you expected?

Postby Nova » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:55 pm

agcl0913 wrote:
theprophet89 wrote:5 year anniversary since Comparative Reading iirc. Any new twists?


Yes - each LG got two pages. So much space to use I was overwhelmed. And confused when I opened the section.


are you kidding? wtf?




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexandros, loyalroyal, SunDevil14, Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests