Article: Bad news for 2012-2013 LSAT takers

User avatar
sd5289
Posts: 1624
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:02 pm

Article: Bad news for 2012-2013 LSAT takers

Postby sd5289 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:36 pm

You get to pay moar monies:

http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202549418909&LSAT_volume_is_down_so_fees_are_going_up

Why? Straight from the horse's mouth:

"It is now time for us to correct our fees in light of new volume realities, and to align them more closely with the true value of those services to law schools and their applicants," Bernstine wrote. "We sincerely hope that this will be the only correction to our candidate-fee levels, and that the 'new normal' will identify itself in the next couple of years."


:roll:

User avatar
LSAT Blog
Posts: 1262
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: Article: Bad news for 2012-2013 LSAT takers

Postby LSAT Blog » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:47 pm

I wrote that story on Tuesday:

http://lsatblog.blogspot.com/2012/04/ls ... e-why.html

Funny how hers uses the same source as mine (an LSAC report from December) and came out the day after...

Anyway, we've been discussing the fee increase here:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=170835&start=675#p5425660

User avatar
sd5289
Posts: 1624
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:02 pm

Re: Article: Bad news for 2012-2013 LSAT takers

Postby sd5289 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:03 pm

LSAT Blog wrote:Funny how hers uses the same source as mine (an LSAC report from December) and came out the day after...


Ooh, burn.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: tracy9524 and 4 guests