Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     Forum Archives     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats

TLS would like to remind its users that it is unlawful to share or distribute copies of copyrighted materials. Click here for copyright infringement notification information.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Preptest 57 Section 3 #16
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:46 pm
Posts: 31
"As modern methods of communication and transportation have continued to improve, the pace of life today has become faster than ever before."

That is a correlation right? We do not know that the modern methods caused the pace of life to be faster than ever before.

Because you could say that, "As test scores drop in the district, the price of gasoline has risen higher than ever before.

That would obviously show that this structure is one indicating correlation.

Since that is true, how could C be the right answer? To say that the changes in people's feelings can result from technological changes?

Can result from = cause. While we only have a correlation. That seems to be the antithesis of conforming to what we are given.

I would be OK with this answer had it said that changes in people's feelings can result from a change in the pace of life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Preptest 57 Section 3 #16
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:46 pm
Posts: 31
I am bumping this thread since it was nearly at the bottom.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Preptest 57 Section 3 #16
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:43 am
Posts: 752
Good catch.

I'd agree that the as/has construction is not very solid in terms of causation or just correlation. However, we need to find an answer to which the statements conform. That means that the statements lend support to it. There's no contradiction or scope shifts between the statements and (C), though there is, as you have pointed out, wiggle room.

And the LSAT has saved itself from any serious criticism by asking which most closely conforms, and every other answer has more significant flaws.

There's a discussion of the wrong answers here.

[Edit for clarity]


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests



Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     Contact     Copyright Notice

copyright 2003-2013 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB