Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:49 am
Lots of people on twitter saying that LSAC lost some February scores for people in Florida.
Trolls?
Trolls?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=178064
WhiteyCakes wrote:Lots of people on twitter saying that LSAC lost some February scores for people in Florida.
Trolls?
apparently all that shit was true.. not trolling, possibly ill-informed... check previous pages in this thread.WhiteyCakes wrote:Lots of people on twitter saying that LSAC lost some February scores for people in Florida.
Trolls?
if it is, this is the greatest trolling ever.WhiteyCakes wrote:Lots of people on twitter saying that LSAC lost some February scores for people in Florida.
Trolls?
Decimated.LSATDecimator wrote:I had to take a test yesterday evening. As I was pondering score possibilities (wasting a considerable amount of time) earlier in the day, I had the sinking feeling that this test would cover not only the previous week's readings but also those for the week to come. When I had the chance to look into this, my suspicions were confirmed. Moreover, the test covered an additional 60 pages of scientific literature and two lectures.
Yet the one beneficial aftereffect of completing over 130 timed reading comp passages over the last three months is that my capacity to read has increased exponentially. I had the lectures and readings (90 pages) completed within 4 hours and went on to achieve a 95 on the test.
A few pages ago a guy also claimed that he took the test at the U of Tampa location and had heard nothing about lost tests. My guess is an elaborate troll but who knows.jigglebottom wrote:apparently all that shit was true.. not trolling, possibly ill-informed... check previous pages in this thread.WhiteyCakes wrote:Lots of people on twitter saying that LSAC lost some February scores for people in Florida.
Trolls?
Sames. This would be infinitely less frustrating if they ever actually just posted the scores on the day they said they would instead of posting them at some arbitrary day before.WhiteyCakes wrote:Really starting to feel like scores won't be out until tomorrow.
Define upset, you mean winning Ga or winning Super Tuesday?jigglebottom wrote:50 bucks gingrich pulls an upset today
jigglebottom wrote:50 bucks gingrich pulls an upset today
i think we may have to hit wall st. for that..R86 wrote:On.
Do they take election bets in Vegas?
wakka! wrote:WhiteyCakes wrote:Lots of people on twitter saying that LSAC lost some February scores for people in Florida.
Trolls?
Someone posted like 30ish pages back saying they were from Tampa and like 50 test answer books were lost. It was never confirmed or disproven.
Anyway, all of the posts between this and when I went to sleep last night:
Soconn13 wrote:jigglebottom wrote:50 bucks gingrich pulls an upset today
I'll give you two to one that he doesn't crack 25% in any state but Georgia.
Also, yeah, pretty sure it's going to be tomorrow. LSAC has crushed my soul, and my dreams.
wakka! wrote:Soconn13 wrote:jigglebottom wrote:50 bucks gingrich pulls an upset today
I'll give you two to one that he doesn't crack 25% in any state but Georgia.
Also, yeah, pretty sure it's going to be tomorrow. LSAC has crushed my soul, and my dreams.
RON PAUL 2012
Haha well put sir +100LSATDecimator wrote:Never in the history of the world has there been such a dreadful waste in human captial as we have witnessed here these past five days.
If our nation falters in the years to come, it just may be attributable to the fact that 20,000 of the country's most intelligent individuals were doing nothing more than pressing F5 for innumerable days on end.
burgers.crede wrote:Fyo'Couch wrote:Ha yea I guess that part does kind of resemble a flaw stimulus but it's not actually fallacious because it undercuts your suggestion that simply labeling something as "terrorist" is sufficient to make said thing terrorist. I do appreciate your appeal to emotion fallacy, thoughcrede wrote:The last part sounds like a flaw in the reasoning question (are we still talking about the LSAT?). While I'm all for conspiracy theories that show Israel to be intentionally undermining their national security, I am particularly amused by people who suggest that Hamas is not a terrorist organization. I implore you take your girlfriend on an all inclusive vacation to Al-Bustan resort in Gaza and tell me about the bevy of rights and freedoms you enjoy on your stay there.Fyo'Couch wrote:
Yes. Do you understand how labeling an organization as "terrorist" may also be a convenient way to justify forced displacement of peoples? I'm for a two-state solution; the middle east conflict is not a zero sum game as it's often construed. But the "terrorist" argument doesn't really work here. Until 2008 the United States designated Nelson Mandela as a terrorist, after all.