February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

How do you think you scored?

Below a 160
42
24%
161-162
11
6%
163-164
18
10%
165-166
15
9%
167-168
16
9%
169-170
10
6%
171-172
22
13%
173-174
14
8%
175-176
6
3%
177+
19
11%
 
Total votes: 173

User avatar
anteater1
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby anteater1 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:36 pm

Fyo'Couch wrote:

Something along the lines of to what extent do you believe Kim Jong-un was involved in the recent agreements made to renew IAEA inspections and whether he is more or less likely than his father to adhere to nuclear non-proliferation. Definitely speculative to a certain extent.


I just completed your memo for you:

"no"


I don't disagree but there are arguments to be made to the contrary.

Mayhem
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:35 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby Mayhem » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:38 pm

beebela wrote:
bernaldiaz wrote:
Troll_444 wrote:ALERT

My icons just turned grey!!! Scores are coming!!


Fuck you


+1000

thomasjmai22
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 2:27 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby thomasjmai22 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:39 pm

gronk wrote:Lets get back to speculating on the crazy difficulty lsac had in arriving at a curve because of the extreme difficulty of the test, and that being the reason we don't have scores yet. Maybe we'll get lucky with a -17 curve!!


-17 is as likely as LSAC losing our scores and letting us pick our own.

User avatar
bernaldiaz
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby bernaldiaz » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:39 pm

thomasjmai22 wrote:
gronk wrote:Lets get back to speculating on the crazy difficulty lsac had in arriving at a curve because of the extreme difficulty of the test, and that being the reason we don't have scores yet. Maybe we'll get lucky with a -17 curve!!


-17 is as likely as LSAC losing our scores and letting us pick our own.


I'd pick a 180!

maxmartin
Posts: 383
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:41 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby maxmartin » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:40 pm

not greedy, only wish -13, but we will never know

User avatar
Kit Cloudkicker
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:58 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby Kit Cloudkicker » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:40 pm

thomasjmai22 wrote:
gronk wrote:Lets get back to speculating on the crazy difficulty lsac had in arriving at a curve because of the extreme difficulty of the test, and that being the reason we don't have scores yet. Maybe we'll get lucky with a -17 curve!!


-17 is as likely as LSAC losing our scores and letting us pick our own.



I'd pick 171. No need to be greedy.

Fyo'Couch
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:38 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby Fyo'Couch » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:40 pm

anteater1 wrote:
Fyo'Couch wrote:

Something along the lines of to what extent do you believe Kim Jong-un was involved in the recent agreements made to renew IAEA inspections and whether he is more or less likely than his father to adhere to nuclear non-proliferation. Definitely speculative to a certain extent.


I just completed your memo for you:

"no"


I don't disagree but there are arguments to be made to the contrary.


Countries do not give up their nuclear capabilities (except Libya) especially when its their strongest (only?) national asset.

SaxMonkey
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:44 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby SaxMonkey » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:41 pm

bernaldiaz wrote:
thomasjmai22 wrote:
gronk wrote:Lets get back to speculating on the crazy difficulty lsac had in arriving at a curve because of the extreme difficulty of the test, and that being the reason we don't have scores yet. Maybe we'll get lucky with a -17 curve!!


-17 is as likely as LSAC losing our scores and letting us pick our own.


I'd pick a 180!


I'd pick a 164. I'm not too greedy.

User avatar
agcl0913
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:49 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby agcl0913 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:41 pm

thomasjmai22 wrote:
gronk wrote:Lets get back to speculating on the crazy difficulty lsac had in arriving at a curve because of the extreme difficulty of the test, and that being the reason we don't have scores yet. Maybe we'll get lucky with a -17 curve!!


-17 is as likely as LSAC losing our scores and letting us pick our own.


180 FOR EVERYONE!

User avatar
bernaldiaz
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby bernaldiaz » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:41 pm

Fyo'Couch wrote:
anteater1 wrote:
Fyo'Couch wrote:

Something along the lines of to what extent do you believe Kim Jong-un was involved in the recent agreements made to renew IAEA inspections and whether he is more or less likely than his father to adhere to nuclear non-proliferation. Definitely speculative to a certain extent.


I just completed your memo for you:

"no"


I don't disagree but there are arguments to be made to the contrary.


Countries do not give up their nuclear capabilities (except Libya) especially when its their strongest (only?) national asset.


Why does the internet always say how hungry Kim Jong Un is? I missed the beginning of that meme and never caught on.

Fyo'Couch
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:38 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby Fyo'Couch » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:44 pm


Why does the internet always say how hungry Kim Jong Un is? I missed the beginning of that meme and never caught on.


Because he's the only person in North Korea pushing 180 lbs.

thomasjmai22
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 2:27 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby thomasjmai22 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:44 pm

Why does the internet always say how hungry Kim Jong Un is? I missed the beginning of that meme and never caught on.[/quote]

He ate our tests!!! Now a real reason to nuke them!

User avatar
bernaldiaz
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby bernaldiaz » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:45 pm

Fyo'Couch wrote:

Why does the internet always say how hungry Kim Jong Un is? I missed the beginning of that meme and never caught on.


Because he's the only person in North Korea pushing 180 lbs.


God damnit I demand the truth!

User avatar
Jsa725
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby Jsa725 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:46 pm

.
Last edited by Jsa725 on Fri May 31, 2013 12:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Fyo'Couch
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:38 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby Fyo'Couch » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:47 pm

bernaldiaz wrote:
Fyo'Couch wrote:

Why does the internet always say how hungry Kim Jong Un is? I missed the beginning of that meme and never caught on.


Because he's the only person in North Korea pushing 180 lbs.


God damnit I demand the truth!


Seriously, you would be hungry too if your entire diet consisted of simple carbohydrates. Would you like a side of rice with your rice?

User avatar
agcl0913
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:49 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby agcl0913 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:51 pm


User avatar
bernaldiaz
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby bernaldiaz » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:52 pm

Fyo'Couch wrote:
Seriously, you would be hungry too if your entire diet consisted of simple carbohydrates. Would you like a side of rice with your rice?


Is Bernal Diaz gunna have to choke a bitch

Fyo'Couch
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:38 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby Fyo'Couch » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:52 pm

agcl0913 wrote:http://kimjongillookingatthings.tumblr.com/


soo 2009 brah.

Fyo'Couch
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:38 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby Fyo'Couch » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:53 pm

bernaldiaz wrote:
Fyo'Couch wrote:
Seriously, you would be hungry too if your entire diet consisted of simple carbohydrates. Would you like a side of rice with your rice?


Is Bernal Diaz gunna have to choke a bitch


fuck your couch man.

TheNav
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 10:23 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby TheNav » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:54 pm

thomasjmai22 wrote:
Why does the internet always say how hungry Kim Jong Un is? I missed the beginning of that meme and never caught on.


He ate our tests!!! Now a real reason to nuke them!


Image

User avatar
sbaron
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:00 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby sbaron » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:58 pm

So any possibility of a release tonight?

User avatar
anteater1
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby anteater1 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:59 pm

Jsa725 wrote:As long as we are waiting...

Anteater do you thin KJU is basically a puppet right now? I mean the 12 generals that always surround him probably have considerable influence. They will push him, presumably, toward the old stubborn north korea. Perhaps they'll oblige until the food arrives but then retract all promises.


That's probably the consensus view. KJI came into power at a later age and as the only suitable successor whereas KJU is younger (28-30) and wasn't the first choice to succeed KJI. I can only speculate but I think his foreign policy for the most part is shaped for him, as he gets older he'll likely take a stronger role.

User avatar
noleknight16
Posts: 943
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby noleknight16 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:59 pm

sbaron wrote:So any possibility of a release tonight?


Slim. Very slim

User avatar
fatpeopleavenger
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:32 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby fatpeopleavenger » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:00 pm

sbaron wrote:So any possibility of a release tonight?


It's 8 pm EST right now, so chances are, very very slim at this point.

argh.

Fyo'Couch
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:38 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

Postby Fyo'Couch » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:00 pm

sbaron wrote:So any possibility of a release tonight?


I just asked my girlfriend the same question.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests