February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)

How do you think you scored?

Below a 160
42
24%
161-162
11
6%
163-164
18
10%
165-166
15
9%
167-168
16
9%
169-170
10
6%
171-172
22
13%
173-174
14
8%
175-176
6
3%
177+
19
11%
 
Total votes: 173

User avatar
bernaldiaz
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby bernaldiaz » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:20 am

RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
anteater1 wrote:
RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
Lol you're funny bro the 171 and 172 you got on tests? Thats my average, and I've hit 175+ on multiple occasions. Remember how I said I used to be a pro poker player? Name your price and ill guarantee that I beat your score chump.


180. Beat it.


Put your money where your mouth is little buddy. :wink:


Lol you can't beat 180. That's a perfect score. Who do you think you are - Elle Woods?


Haha Herp Derp read my post above. That is pretty poor reading comprehension.

User avatar
RodionRaskolnikov
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby RodionRaskolnikov » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:21 am

bernaldiaz wrote:
RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
Lol you're funny bro the 171 and 172 you got on tests? Thats my average, and I've hit 175+ on multiple occasions. Remember how I said I used to be a pro poker player? Name your price and ill guarantee that I beat your score chump.


180. Beat it.


This is getting good. My money is on Anteater over RR, and my money is on me out of the lot to smoke both of you fools!

Just kidding 180's for everyone!

But honestly RR that "180. Beat it." was a major Herp Derp response. He wasn't saying to name any score and he would beat it, he was saying name any amount of money that he beats your score.


Thanks for explaining because I can't read. He said he scored 175+ so obviously he is capable of beating my score. I was just moving the convo along.

User avatar
pancakelover
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:36 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby pancakelover » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:22 am

RR doesn't understand how gambling works. I think this has been well-established. :D

User avatar
anteater1
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby anteater1 » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:23 am

No need for me to have a pissing contest with you RR, I know my results and you know yours. nuff said.

Fyo'Couch
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:38 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby Fyo'Couch » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:23 am

RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
anteater1 wrote:
RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
Lol you're funny bro the 171 and 172 you got on tests? Thats my average, and I've hit 175+ on multiple occasions. Remember how I said I used to be a pro poker player? Name your price and ill guarantee that I beat your score chump.


180. Beat it.


Put your money where your mouth is little buddy. :wink:


Lol you can't beat 180. That's a perfect score. Who do you think you are - Elle Woods?


Internet pissing contest over potential LSAT scores? Really?

User avatar
RodionRaskolnikov
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby RodionRaskolnikov » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:23 am

I feel like a celebrity surrounded by paparazzi (sp?)! So how did you guys feel about the test? Easy? Difficult? Average? What section bummed you out?

User avatar
noleknight16
Posts: 943
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby noleknight16 » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:25 am

I didn't mean to start a piss match with my 163 post.

My bad lol.

User avatar
RodionRaskolnikov
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby RodionRaskolnikov » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:25 am

anteater1 wrote:No need for me to have a pissing contest with you RR, I know my results and you know yours. nuff said.


I bet you're from a high income family? If so, your high score holds little merit.

User avatar
Jsa725
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby Jsa725 » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:27 am

.
Last edited by Jsa725 on Thu May 30, 2013 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
bernaldiaz
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby bernaldiaz » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:28 am

RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
anteater1 wrote:No need for me to have a pissing contest with you RR, I know my results and you know yours. nuff said.


I bet you're from a high income family? If so, your high score holds little merit.


Lol you are either inadvertently hilarious or extremely good at parody.

User avatar
anteater1
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby anteater1 » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:29 am

noleknight16 wrote:I didn't mean to start a piss match with my 163 post.

My bad lol.


I just got irked when he said "eww" I didn't intend to start a pissing contest but that's just plain tactless in my book even if you weren't offended.

User avatar
RodionRaskolnikov
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby RodionRaskolnikov » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:32 am

Jsa725 wrote:
RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
anteater1 wrote:No need for me to have a pissing contest with you RR, I know my results and you know yours. nuff said.


I bet you're from a high income family? If so, your high score holds little merit.


I figured it out... RR = Napoleon complex


someone was hoping for a 163 and since I was hoping for a 170+, which is a bit harder to get and I don't know if I'll get it, I said eww about my expectation but someone misread it and thought I wrote it about the other guy's post.. so I responded with some snazzy comments. No Napoleon complex here. Maybe Robespierre complex. Lol no just kidding.

User avatar
bernaldiaz
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby bernaldiaz » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:34 am

RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
Jsa725 wrote:
RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
anteater1 wrote:No need for me to have a pissing contest with you RR, I know my results and you know yours. nuff said.


I bet you're from a high income family? If so, your high score holds little merit.


I figured it out... RR = Napoleon complex


someone was hoping for a 163 and since I was hoping for a 170+, which is a bit harder to get and I don't know if I'll get it, I said eww about my expectation but someone misread it and thought I wrote it about the other guy's post.. so I responded with some snazzy comments. No Napoleon complex here. Maybe Robespierre complex. Lol no just kidding.


Dude that makes zero sense.

User avatar
RodionRaskolnikov
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby RodionRaskolnikov » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:35 am


Dude that makes zero sense.


I didn't expect the majority here to get it. You're fine.

User avatar
Jsa725
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby Jsa725 » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:36 am

.
Last edited by Jsa725 on Thu May 30, 2013 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Fyo'Couch
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:38 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby Fyo'Couch » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:39 am

Jsa725 wrote:
RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
anteater1 wrote:No need for me to have a pissing contest with you RR, I know my results and you know yours. nuff said.


I bet you're from a high income family? If so, your high score holds little merit.


I figured it out... RR = Napoleon complex


I see this kind of thing all the time. As much as RR is getting railed on, I bet he is extremely intelligent (academically) and will do very well on this test. Social tact however, isn't something you can learn from a book. Some people are brilliant but struggle with their day to day human interactions (Aspergers?). I feel like a lot of potential law students are like this, which is why the there is a lot of backlash for the LSAT as a gauge of law school or career success.

Conclusion: He's not trying to irk anyone here so cut him some slack. He's just happens to be unintentionally offensive/funny.
Last edited by Fyo'Couch on Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
bernaldiaz
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby bernaldiaz » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:41 am

RodionRaskolnikov wrote:

Dude that makes zero sense.


I didn't expect the majority here to get it. You're fine.


I'm not talking about your cute little Robespierre complex. I get that, you're not as sophisticated as you think. Your general logic that you said "eww to your expectations" makes no sense. Why would you say eww that you expect a 170?

User avatar
anteater1
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby anteater1 » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:41 am

Fyo'Couch wrote:
Jsa725 wrote:
RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
anteater1 wrote:No need for me to have a pissing contest with you RR, I know my results and you know yours. nuff said.


I bet you're from a high income family? If so, your high score holds little merit.


I figured it out... RR = Napoleon complex


I see this kind of thing all the time. As much as RR is getting railed on, I bet he is extremely intelligent (academically) and will do very well on this test. Social tact however, isn't something you can learn from a book. Some people are brilliant but struggle with their day to day human interactions (Aspergers?). I feel like a lot of potential law students are like this, which is why the there is a lot of backlash for the LSAT as a gauge of law school or career success.


I was just about to say Aspergers or ASPD, I feel bad arguing with him it's like arguing with my middle school students.

User avatar
RodionRaskolnikov
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby RodionRaskolnikov » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:44 am

Fyo'Couch wrote:
Jsa725 wrote:
RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
anteater1 wrote:No need for me to have a pissing contest with you RR, I know my results and you know yours. nuff said.


I bet you're from a high income family? If so, your high score holds little merit.


I figured it out... RR = Napoleon complex


I see this kind of thing all the time. As much as RR is getting railed on, I bet he is extremely intelligent (academically) and will do very well on this test. Social tact however, isn't something you can learn from a book. Some people are brilliant but struggle with their day to day human interactions (Aspergers?). I feel like a lot of potential law students are like this, which is why the there is a lot of backlash for the LSAT as a gauge of law school or career success.


I'm not socially handicapped, if that's what you're implying! I got railed on because some guy misread my comment, ignored my swift explanation of it, and then continued to be a cabbage patch kid for ~4 posts. Would you be quiet if the guy said he could piss on your score after you were nice enough to help another test taker who received lower scores than you did? I didn't think so.

User avatar
pancakelover
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:36 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby pancakelover » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:45 am

Fyo'Couch wrote:
Jsa725 wrote:
RodionRaskolnikov wrote:
anteater1 wrote:No need for me to have a pissing contest with you RR, I know my results and you know yours. nuff said.


I bet you're from a high income family? If so, your high score holds little merit.


I figured it out... RR = Napoleon complex


I see this kind of thing all the time. As much as RR is getting railed on, I bet he is extremely intelligent (academically) and will do very well on this test. Social tact however, isn't something you can learn from a book. Some people are brilliant but struggle with their day to day human interactions (Aspergers?). I feel like a lot of potential law students are like this, which is why the there is a lot of backlash for the LSAT as a gauge of law school or career success.

Conclusion: He's not trying to irk anyone here so cut him some slack. He's just happens to be unintentionally offensive/funny.



lmao so far, RR has been accused of having a bad LSAT score, being in an LSAT score pissing match, having Napoleon complex, and now having Aspergers syndrome. Too funny.

User avatar
Jsa725
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby Jsa725 » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:46 am

.
Last edited by Jsa725 on Thu May 30, 2013 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
bernaldiaz
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby bernaldiaz » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:47 am

pancakelover wrote:lmao so far, RR has been accused of having a bad LSAT score, being in an LSAT score pissing match, having Napoleon complex, and now having Aspergers syndrome. Too funny.


Join the lynch mob you fool or we'll turn on you next

User avatar
anteater1
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby anteater1 » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:48 am

bernaldiaz wrote:
pancakelover wrote:lmao so far, RR has been accused of having a bad LSAT score, being in an LSAT score pissing match, having Napoleon complex, and now having Aspergers syndrome. Too funny.


Join the lynch mob you fool or we'll turn on you next


+1, waffles > pancakes

User avatar
RodionRaskolnikov
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby RodionRaskolnikov » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:48 am

bernaldiaz wrote:
pancakelover wrote:lmao so far, RR has been accused of having a bad LSAT score, being in an LSAT score pissing match, having Napoleon complex, and now having Aspergers syndrome. Too funny.


Join the lynch mob you fool or we'll turn on you next


That awkward moment when socioeconomic advantage turns out to be a disadvantage.

Image

User avatar
pancakelover
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:36 pm

Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread

Postby pancakelover » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:49 am

i can't figure out how to embed images. fail.
Last edited by pancakelover on Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:51 am, edited 1 time in total.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: packerboy31489, Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests