Anyone have any idea how a -13 curve would look like? I'm new to these forums, but I assume it means that 13 mistakes would be curved to a 170?noleknight16 wrote:160, 3.6 retaking for waitlists and scholarship negotiation. Hoping to hit 163-164. Not sure if I made it or not but oh well. Graduated with my bachelors already and took a year off to improve my LSAT and get into better schools. It felt like a typical test. LG was a little bit more difficult since pet owners was a type I suck at big time, but RC was on the easier side. Curve of -12 sounds right. -11 wouldn't surprise me. -13+ is divine intervention.bernaldiaz wrote:So are people here applying for next cycle? Retaking for this cycle? Juniors, seniors, graduates? What are you shooting for? How'd feel relative to other practice tests?
As for me, I'm applying next cycle, junior in college. Hoping for a 172+ and I think the test felt like most others, so hopefully it fits within my PT range of the last couple months of 170-179
February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!) Forum
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:27 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
- noleknight16
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Correct. -13 for a 170.shempskidd wrote:Anyone have any idea how a -13 curve would look like? I'm new to these forums, but I assume it means that 13 mistakes would be curved to a 170?noleknight16 wrote:160, 3.6 retaking for waitlists and scholarship negotiation. Hoping to hit 163-164. Not sure if I made it or not but oh well. Graduated with my bachelors already and took a year off to improve my LSAT and get into better schools. It felt like a typical test. LG was a little bit more difficult since pet owners was a type I suck at big time, but RC was on the easier side. Curve of -12 sounds right. -11 wouldn't surprise me. -13+ is divine intervention.bernaldiaz wrote:So are people here applying for next cycle? Retaking for this cycle? Juniors, seniors, graduates? What are you shooting for? How'd feel relative to other practice tests?
As for me, I'm applying next cycle, junior in college. Hoping for a 172+ and I think the test felt like most others, so hopefully it fits within my PT range of the last couple months of 170-179
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Had 2 LG sections.
Can someone help me fill this in? im blanking on the full LG sections
real:
Wed Fri AM PM
Pets and Apartments
___x
___y
experimental:
Birds and Lecture Halls
Movie Times
___x
___y
have i got it right?
Can someone help me fill this in? im blanking on the full LG sections
real:
Wed Fri AM PM
Pets and Apartments
___x
___y
experimental:
Birds and Lecture Halls
Movie Times
___x
___y
have i got it right?
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:27 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Damn, that was a fast reply. Anyone have a curve to show me what that would look like, so that I could guess-timate how many mistakes I made and what my projected score would be?noleknight16 wrote:Correct. -13 for a 170.shempskidd wrote:Anyone have any idea how a -13 curve would look like? I'm new to these forums, but I assume it means that 13 mistakes would be curved to a 170?noleknight16 wrote:160, 3.6 retaking for waitlists and scholarship negotiation. Hoping to hit 163-164. Not sure if I made it or not but oh well. Graduated with my bachelors already and took a year off to improve my LSAT and get into better schools. It felt like a typical test. LG was a little bit more difficult since pet owners was a type I suck at big time, but RC was on the easier side. Curve of -12 sounds right. -11 wouldn't surprise me. -13+ is divine intervention.bernaldiaz wrote:So are people here applying for next cycle? Retaking for this cycle? Juniors, seniors, graduates? What are you shooting for? How'd feel relative to other practice tests?
As for me, I'm applying next cycle, junior in college. Hoping for a 172+ and I think the test felt like most others, so hopefully it fits within my PT range of the last couple months of 170-179
-
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:39 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Yes.atl1054 wrote:Had 2 LG sections.
Can someone help me fill this in? im blanking on the full LG sections
real:
Wed Fri AM PM
Pets and Apartments
___x
___y
experimental:
Birds and Lecture Halls
Movie Times
___x
___y
have i got it right?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- agcl0913
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:49 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
For real, one of them is long and short commercials. I had a different experimental.atl1054 wrote:Had 2 LG sections.
Can someone help me fill this in? im blanking on the full LG sections
real:
Wed Fri AM PM
Pets and Apartments
___x
___y
experimental:
Birds and Lecture Halls
Movie Times
___x
___y
have i got it right?
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
First time poster, loooooong time follower.
I had RC(exp)-LR-Lg-LR RC
Thought logic games were on par, I hit 3 of them fully and guessed the pets apt one
The experimental reading comp was easier then the real one, I think, but it was first so who knows... Both were quite simple IMO, just ran into a little timing rush towards the end, presumably from fatigue, but still completed them all comfortably
LR I found interesting on this test, I usually am around 92-96% accurate on LR, it's by far my best consistently good section. I found them harder then usual, but I didn't get tripped up, I usually finish 23/25 in the first 15 min, then do the two skipped, then review any that I didn't put a check next to signifying that I am certain I got them right. On this test I had a little less time to mess around with reviewing, but still handled each question confidently.
I am hoping this will benefit me, I've found the test usually accommodates a tough section with an easy one, and being most skilled at LR, and it having twice the questions, usually means when the LR is the tougher section, I end up on the higher side of the curve, just my experience.. In either case I have a pretty good idea where I scored... Are we still listing lr? I could remember a few I'm sure...
I had RC(exp)-LR-Lg-LR RC
Thought logic games were on par, I hit 3 of them fully and guessed the pets apt one
The experimental reading comp was easier then the real one, I think, but it was first so who knows... Both were quite simple IMO, just ran into a little timing rush towards the end, presumably from fatigue, but still completed them all comfortably
LR I found interesting on this test, I usually am around 92-96% accurate on LR, it's by far my best consistently good section. I found them harder then usual, but I didn't get tripped up, I usually finish 23/25 in the first 15 min, then do the two skipped, then review any that I didn't put a check next to signifying that I am certain I got them right. On this test I had a little less time to mess around with reviewing, but still handled each question confidently.
I am hoping this will benefit me, I've found the test usually accommodates a tough section with an easy one, and being most skilled at LR, and it having twice the questions, usually means when the LR is the tougher section, I end up on the higher side of the curve, just my experience.. In either case I have a pretty good idea where I scored... Are we still listing lr? I could remember a few I'm sure...
- noleknight16
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Have fun!!!shempskidd wrote: Damn, that was a fast reply. Anyone have a curve to show me what that would look like, so that I could guess-timate how many mistakes I made and what my projected score would be?
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
THE FOUR REAL LOGIC GAMES
Loose sequencing involving H L J K F M
I would list the rules, but I think that's a no no
Pets to apartments
Long commercial short commercial
Wed morning, Friday morning Friday afternoon
---------
That's it.
Loose sequencing involving H L J K F M
I would list the rules, but I think that's a no no
Pets to apartments
Long commercial short commercial
Wed morning, Friday morning Friday afternoon
---------
That's it.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:27 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Thanks for the chart. Much appreciated. One more question. So the people who had LG-LR-LG-RC-LR (or is it LG-LR-LG-LR-RC?) had the first LG's as the real one?
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Real Reading Comp
Bankruptcy
Sand Storm Fossils
Art Subsidies
Heirloom agriculture
-----------
That's it
Bankruptcy
Sand Storm Fossils
Art Subsidies
Heirloom agriculture
-----------
That's it
Last edited by Clearly on Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- agcl0913
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:49 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Was the commercials one last?Clearlynotstefan wrote:THE FOUR REAL LOGIC GAMES
Loose sequencing involving H L J K F M
I would list the rules, but I think that's a no no
Pets to apartments
Long commercial short commercial
Wed morning, Friday morning Friday afternoon
---------
That's it.
- agcl0913
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:49 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Yup.shempskidd wrote:Thanks for the chart. Much appreciated. One more question. So the people who had LG-LR-LG-RC-LR (or is it LG-LR-LG-LR-RC?) had the first LG's as the real one?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:35 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Clearlynotstefan wrote:Real Reading Comp
Bankruptcy
Sand Storm Fossils
Art Subsidies
Physics/mathematics, about generalizing
-----------
That's it
I had the first 3, the last one was about heirloom agriculture
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Which one was the real RC?
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Shit your right, my bad!crede wrote:Clearlynotstefan wrote:Real Reading Comp
Bankruptcy
Sand Storm Fossils
Art Subsidies
Physics/mathematics, about generalizing
-----------
That's it
I had the first 3, the last one was about heirloom agriculture
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
same here...crede wrote:Clearlynotstefan wrote:Real Reading Comp
Bankruptcy
Sand Storm Fossils
Art Subsidies
Physics/mathematics, about generalizing
-----------
That's it
I had the first 3, the last one was about heirloom agriculture
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- barrotmartin
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:19 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Mine was LR LG LR LR RC.
25, 23, 25, 25, 27-- though with people saying the second LR section was 26 I'm second guessing myself...
LG: Commercials, Apartments/Pet owners, Wed/Fri, Interviews
RC: Heirlooms/Agriculture, Tax Subs, Bankruptcy, Sand storm/Fossils.
No show for a rc on race/gender...
25, 23, 25, 25, 27-- though with people saying the second LR section was 26 I'm second guessing myself...
LG: Commercials, Apartments/Pet owners, Wed/Fri, Interviews
RC: Heirlooms/Agriculture, Tax Subs, Bankruptcy, Sand storm/Fossils.
No show for a rc on race/gender...
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
That sucks! I was hoping that the RC section with the mathematics/physics was the real one. I did much better on it than I did on the second RC (the one with the sand dunes)
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
List of real sections
Reading Comp
-------
Bankruptcy
Heirloom Agriculture
Art Subsidies
Sandstorm Fossils
Logic Games
-------
Sequencing H M J L K F
Apartments and Pets
Long commercial, Short commercial
Wed Morning, Friday Morning, Friday Afternoon
Some of the real Logical Reasoning questions
------
Liming a lake
Pesticide advertisement Weaken
There are more Short documentary then long scifi films.. Parallel with apartments and Victorians bathtubs
Bookstores hardcover best seller
Ants living in tree roots
Martian space rock life in space
Trucks vs snow studs, destroying roads
The mayors business affairs critics weaken
Vitamin C acne
..l can keep going... I think I've shared enough that everyone should know what's real.
I hope I did as well answering them as I did remembering them!
Reading Comp
-------
Bankruptcy
Heirloom Agriculture
Art Subsidies
Sandstorm Fossils
Logic Games
-------
Sequencing H M J L K F
Apartments and Pets
Long commercial, Short commercial
Wed Morning, Friday Morning, Friday Afternoon
Some of the real Logical Reasoning questions
------
Liming a lake
Pesticide advertisement Weaken
There are more Short documentary then long scifi films.. Parallel with apartments and Victorians bathtubs
Bookstores hardcover best seller
Ants living in tree roots
Martian space rock life in space
Trucks vs snow studs, destroying roads
The mayors business affairs critics weaken
Vitamin C acne
..l can keep going... I think I've shared enough that everyone should know what's real.
I hope I did as well answering them as I did remembering them!
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:27 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Has anyone done so badly on a section they guess most of the questions (for LG), but felt confident they got all the answers in other sections and done well?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Depends on the idea of well I suppose. And how well on the other sections...80% well?, or 95% well... If the latter, you could still see a good score with some guessing luck, and how many you actually had to guessshempskidd wrote:Has anyone done so badly on a section they guess most of the questions (for LG), but felt confident they got all the answers in other sections and done well?
- barrotmartin
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:19 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
You can miss all 23 logic game questions and get a 160. But the chances are slim (you had to have missed none in the other sections...). Chances are also slim that you missed all 23 questions as long as you guessed one letter for all the questions.
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 2:27 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Anyone get three LR's?
- agcl0913
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:49 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Since Feb is an undisclosed test, do we get raw scores too or just the straight up 3-digit number?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login