Grouping LG: "If X, Y, or both.."

User avatar
desiballa21
Posts: 440
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:33 pm

Grouping LG: "If X, Y, or both.."

Postby desiballa21 » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:57 am

Question: On conditions that have "If X, Y, or both appear, Z also appears," what becomes the contrapositive? I know when you flip and negate, you change "or" to "and" and vice versa. But what if it's like the condition I wrote and it has both an "and" and "or?"

User avatar
breadbucket
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:57 pm

Re: Grouping LG: "If X, Y, or both.."

Postby breadbucket » Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:01 am

just take out the "or both", thus, if not z then not X and not Y. not having x or y means you cant possibly have both.

User avatar
suspicious android
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Grouping LG: "If X, Y, or both.."

Postby suspicious android » Mon Dec 12, 2011 3:53 pm

Like breadbucket was saying, "or both" in that phrase is extraneous. Unless explicitly told otherwise, always assume "or" is inclusive, that is, it already means "or both".

So you'd just get

X or Y --> Z
~Z --> ~X and ~Y

User avatar
willwash
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:51 pm

Re: Grouping LG: "If X, Y, or both.."

Postby willwash » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:42 pm

desiballa21 wrote:Question: On conditions that have "If X, Y, or both appear, Z also appears," what becomes the contrapositive? I know when you flip and negate, you change "or" to "and" and vice versa. But what if it's like the condition I wrote and it has both an "and" and "or?"


Or, to actually word it:

Rule: If X, Y, or both appear, then Z also appears

Contrapositive: if Z does not appear, then neither X nor Y appear-->because if either X or Y DID appear, then Z would HAVE to appear.

EDIT: I like to actually write these out as sentences, because the minute I see stuff like:

X,Y-->Z = -Z=-X,-Y

My brain just turns off.

User avatar
desiballa21
Posts: 440
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Grouping LG: "If X, Y, or both.."

Postby desiballa21 » Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:03 pm

A second question.. what do y'all think about in/out games? I'm having a lot of trouble with them and it's hard to move on from here. Only in my third week of LSAT prep but this is the first time I'm having significant trouble. Keeping track of all the inferences, double-arrows, and contrapositives and then heading to the games seems time-consuming. Nearly took 45 minutes on that bird game on my first time seeing it. Is there another way that you recommend to keep track of the rules or to attack the question? I've heard some people use huge chains to keep track of all the rules.

SingleLadies
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:46 pm

Re: Grouping LG: "If X, Y, or both.."

Postby SingleLadies » Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:04 am

http://lsatblog.blogspot.com/2009/08/lo ... n-out.html

Steve at the LSAT blog has a good method for mapping in and out games. Check it out.

User avatar
desiballa21
Posts: 440
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Grouping LG: "If X, Y, or both.."

Postby desiballa21 » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:53 pm

I am actually using LSAT BLOG's study guide and did see his method for in/out games. It was the huge chain.. Does that work for every in/out game?




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests