Mauve Dinosaur wrote:InGoodFaith wrote:QuincyWagstaff wrote:
What does decent on games mean? How many do you miss on avg? That needs to be down to a very consistent -0.
I mean that, on a PT or drill, I can consistently get -0 and finish with extra time; however, in the high-stakes environment of the real thing (October 2011; a challenging games section for most), I'm not infallible, and I ended up with a -3.
I was proud of my -1 LG on the October '11 LSAT, but got smacked down by RC with a -9
If you don't mind my asking, how the hell did you figure out the bike game? That one just destroyed me, and I'm generally pretty good at games. Hell, I finished the other 3 (and got perfect on them) with 15 minutes to spare and even with 15 minutes I STILL lost 4 marks on that game.
I covered the page and the one before it with bike game hypotheticals. Just started listing every possible combination that would work. It took forever, but like you, I had a lot of time to spare for the last game.