Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

User avatar
cerealnmilk
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby cerealnmilk » Sun Dec 04, 2011 7:50 pm

Guess your Dec 3 LSAT score!

I'll start:

Given that RC blatantly raped me, I'm going to guess a dull an unimpressive 155. Maybe even lower. FML.

Now, let us all go eat our feelings and listen to Alanis Morissette, like real adults.

Image

Miracle
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby Miracle » Sun Dec 04, 2011 7:56 pm

Re-taking in February for this cycle?

User avatar
cerealnmilk
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby cerealnmilk » Sun Dec 04, 2011 7:58 pm

Miracle wrote:Re-taking in February for this cycle?


Depends. If I scored over 160, then no. Anything under, yes.

HellOnHeels
Posts: 548
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:19 pm

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby HellOnHeels » Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:00 pm

180.

User avatar
noleknight16
Posts: 943
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby noleknight16 » Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:05 pm

163. RC is typically my worst and this one was brutal. I may have blown the 1st LR. Gonna suck cause I got -1 on Logic Games. Had a good shot at 170

FloridaCoastalorbust
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:43 pm

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby FloridaCoastalorbust » Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:30 pm

168 with 7 errors on RC

bob-loblaw
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:58 am

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby bob-loblaw » Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:50 pm

REALLY hoping for anything over a 162. I was PTing around 167 but couldn't sleep the night before and totally fucked up LG (usually my best section which makes it hurt even more). Everything else seemed to go ok though, even the RC. So hoping that my performance on the other sections made up for my LG failure.

User avatar
Mr. Pancakes
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby Mr. Pancakes » Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:55 pm

cerealnmilk wrote:Guess your Dec 3 LSAT score!

I'll start:

Given that RC blatantly raped me, I'm going to guess a dull an unimpressive 155. Maybe even lower. FML.

Now, let us all go eat our feelings and listen to Alanis Morissette, like real adults.

Image


I'm pretty sure I scored at least a 176. I'm pretty pissed because I was PTing around 178. I'm going to go slam my flacid weiner in the car door.

User avatar
CorkBoard
Posts: 3216
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:05 pm

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby CorkBoard » Sun Dec 04, 2011 9:13 pm

cerealnmilk wrote:Guess your Dec 3 LSAT score!

I'll start:

Given that RC blatantly raped me, I'm going to guess a dull an unimpressive 155. Maybe even lower. FML.

Now, let us all go eat our feelings and listen to Alanis Morissette, like real adults.

Image


I'm thinking the same thing with my score. wha.

User avatar
RCinDNA
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:55 pm

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby RCinDNA » Mon Dec 05, 2011 3:08 pm

OMG. I'm guessing it's 158. It would be karmic punishment for getting 165+ on my practice tests and feeling like I finally understood the test.

crv8623
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:40 am

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby crv8623 » Mon Dec 05, 2011 3:48 pm

Well, I personally consistently PT at around 167-170 before Oct test and then Got a 155 around 7 points less then my cold diganostic....

Then retook it in Dec with the last four PT being at or aound the same range and was feeling great going into it..

and now....

who knows judging by the way things are going, maybe 160, but Im praying for a 165.

User avatar
fashiongirl
Posts: 279
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:30 am

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby fashiongirl » Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:01 pm

I'm thinking 160.

User avatar
Capitalist
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby Capitalist » Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:05 pm

160-170.

User avatar
SublimeStyle
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 4:42 pm

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby SublimeStyle » Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:50 pm

Coming out of the test I felt 168+. After reading these forums the past couple of days I think around a 160 :(

Azmatt
Posts: 168
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: Because clearly we're all neurotic masochists...

Postby Azmatt » Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:06 pm

159-169.

I think I missed 4-2-5-4. I only know about 2/3 for sure of course.

With a curve of -11, that puts me around 168 or so. BUT, I'm not sure. The fact that 2 questions stumped me on those super easy games make me wonder if I missed an inference. I didn't think any of them were overly complicated, but one of the questions on the last game had two legit answers with the way I diagrammed it.

A few of them were distinctly questions that took me a little time and a few murky answers on the RC. Plus, there were 2 questions on the last section I guessed on.

RC could have been better, but I didn't like a lot of the answers I chose and I'd rather just not expect those to be right.

HOWEVER, if I did miss a game inference and if my LR were worse than I imagine, it could've been nasty. If the RC section was murky because I was just wrong, then i probably missed more than 5. The last soil passage gave me fits and sort of set me up badly for the last LR. If that did more damage than I thought, then it could've just obliterated my score.

But I guessed within 2-3 points last time, so here's to gut feelings!




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dcc617 and 5 guests