LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

thf5007
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:19 pm

LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby thf5007 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:08 pm

Those with LG-LR-LG-RC-LR. Does anyone not doubt that the first was the experimental?

User avatar
Olive
Posts: 1002
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:23 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby Olive » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:09 pm

I sincerely hope that the first section was the real deal because I absolutely rocked that section, had time to go over each answer choice twice!

But....I'm guessing it was too easy?

thf5007
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:19 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby thf5007 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:10 pm

thats my guess

User avatar
Olive
Posts: 1002
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:23 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby Olive » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:13 pm

Going into the second LG, however, I thought the first three games were so easy they had to be experimental. Then by the fourth...things changed.

User avatar
RCinDNA
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:55 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby RCinDNA » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:14 pm

thf5007 wrote:Those with LG-LR-LG-RC-LR. Does anyone not doubt that the first was the experimental?


I thought experimental sections were usually more difficult?

rth887
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:01 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby rth887 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:48 pm

Olive wrote:Going into the second LG, however, I thought the first three games were so easy they had to be experimental. Then by the fourth...things changed.


The first game was one of the easiest ever, IMO.

User avatar
TIKITEMBO
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby TIKITEMBO » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:49 pm

Oh my god I hope the first was experimental. Juice and snacks...christ.

rth887
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:01 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby rth887 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:51 pm

TIKITEMBO wrote:Oh my god I hope the first was experimental. Juice and snacks...christ.


Same here. The flow, phrasing, and questions all seemed off.

User avatar
Monte.Cristo
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:57 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby Monte.Cristo » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:02 pm

rth887 wrote:
TIKITEMBO wrote:Oh my god I hope the first was experimental. Juice and snacks...christ.


Same here. The flow, phrasing, and questions all seemed off.


.

User avatar
TIKITEMBO
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby TIKITEMBO » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:06 pm

Alright, someone without to LG's said they didn't remember having Juice and Snacks. Anyone else heard this?

User avatar
Dawak1
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby Dawak1 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:10 pm

The first LG was absolutely the exp one. If you talk to people who only had 1 LG section, and compare the topics, it's clear. I don't know how the rules are here and I dont wanna be banned so my apologies if this post is annoyingly vague.

User avatar
Dawak1
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby Dawak1 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:10 pm

rth887 wrote:
TIKITEMBO wrote:Oh my god I hope the first was experimental. Juice and snacks...christ.


Same here. The flow, phrasing, and questions all seemed off.


Agreed.

User avatar
TIKITEMBO
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby TIKITEMBO » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:14 pm

No that's cool and thanks that's a relief. I think that's exactly what we're allowed. Don't want to be too specific because it's not released, copyright, etc.

User avatar
RCinDNA
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:55 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby RCinDNA » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:15 pm

Dawak1 wrote:The first LG was absolutely the exp one. If you talk to people who only had 1 LG section, and compare the topics, it's clear. I don't know how the rules are here and I dont wanna be banned so my apologies if this post is annoyingly vague.


I tend to scan the games for the ones that I'm best at, so I might have passed over the juice and snacks one. Is the consensus that the the LG section with the scheduling aspect was the actual credited section?

User avatar
Roza P
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby Roza P » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:20 pm

Hot foods. I'm pretty sure we're allowed to say hot foods eh?

JDProspect
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 7:49 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby JDProspect » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:22 pm

I don't even remember the contents on them, its just a blur. I just hope LG1 was my experimental

seahorsesmusic
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:07 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby seahorsesmusic » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:22 pm

Hot foods. Scheduling. Definitely.

Bummer. I left section 1 feeling great.

User avatar
Roza P
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby Roza P » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:25 pm

With that said. What the fuck man. Why was the first section so easy? I'm sitting here in utter confusion. I did absolutely terrible in Oct, and thought I would kill Dec. I don't feel confident after hearing this. I changed up my strat and I'm not sure what to do or expect now... I'm flying up north to visit some schools next week... fuckkkkk

User avatar
RCinDNA
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:55 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby RCinDNA » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:26 pm

seahorsesmusic wrote:Hot foods. Scheduling. Definitely.

Bummer. I left section 1 feeling great.


Same. I figured LG/Sec 3 was experimental because TV schedules felt weird. For once, I blazed through LG/Sec 1 so I was hopeful for mercy. Alas, the LSAT gods care naught for mercy.

User avatar
Roza P
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby Roza P » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:28 pm

RCinDNA wrote:
seahorsesmusic wrote:Hot foods. Scheduling. Definitely.

Bummer. I left section 1 feeling great.


Same. I figured LG/Sec 3 was experimental because TV schedules felt weird. For once, I blazed through LG/Sec 1 so I was hopeful for mercy. Alas, the LSAT gods care naught for mercy.


they will never

User avatar
Ohiobumpkin
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:50 am

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby Ohiobumpkin » Sun Dec 04, 2011 2:01 am

The first section was experimental. 100% positive.

User avatar
lsacqueen
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby lsacqueen » Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:03 am

Ohiobumpkin wrote:The first section was experimental. 100% positive.



This has been established on numerous threads.. Oh, the redundancy. :roll:

Azmatt
Posts: 168
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby Azmatt » Sun Dec 04, 2011 11:25 am

Was it? Can we consider the possibility that people have two LG might have their order switched as well?


I'm almost assured that tv blocks is something I can ignore.

User avatar
lsacqueen
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby lsacqueen » Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:09 pm

Does anyone remember how many questions the TV game had? Hopefully I'm allowed to ask that... If not, mods, let me know and I'll take it down.

User avatar
Monte.Cristo
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:57 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Postby Monte.Cristo » Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:17 pm

Azmatt wrote:Was it? Can we consider the possibility that people have two LG might have their order switched as well?


I'm almost assured that tv blocks is something I can ignore.


Huh? I thought the section containing the TV blocks (which was the second LG section) was the real one, and that the first LG section was the experimental one...

I also thought that the TV blocks was the experimental... :cry:




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: batlaw, bearedman8, cianchetta0, dontsaywhatyoumean, DumbHollywoodActor, neptunian and 11 guests