Page 3 of 6

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:12 pm
by penguinbrah
^^ are we allowed to discuss what doppelganger is saying?

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:12 pm
by kickthebcket
rth887 wrote:I had the LR-LG-LR-LR-RC. I'm hoping the first section was the experimental. I don't know if it was due to it being the first section of an 8:30 test, but it seemed atypical for LR in terms of questions.
+1, that first section seemed too heavy in the science dept for a real LR section

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:13 pm
by kickthebcket
NomNom wrote:I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC

The first LR was DEFINITELY the experimental. The question stems were noticeably different than anything I had seen before and it felt different. That appears to the be the general consensus.

I sure hope you're right!

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:14 pm
by Cinderella Applicant
penguinbrah wrote:^^ are we allowed to discuss what doppelganger is saying?
Idk if that's too specific. Is this thread even allowed to exist?

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:15 pm
by penguinbrah
Cinderella Applicant wrote:
penguinbrah wrote:^^ are we allowed to discuss what doppelganger is saying?
Idk if that's too specific. Is this thread even allowed to exist?

i dont see why not. to tell you the truth i dont see why the forum has an obligation to LSAC to follow their rules anyway. If LSAC wants to punish people for discussing certain stuff they're more than welcome to go after people's IP Addresses.

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:16 pm
by doppelganger
penguinbrah wrote:^^ are we allowed to discuss what doppelganger is saying?
I'm not asking for answers to questions or giving them, so yes.

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:17 pm
by bluthbanana
I think it's to not give people who take the test later an unfair advantage...which would hurt our curve, no?

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:20 pm
by rth887
LG was "hot"

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:20 pm
by Cinderella Applicant
doppelganger wrote:
penguinbrah wrote:^^ are we allowed to discuss what doppelganger is saying?
I'm not asking for answers to questions or giving them, so yes.
Okay, that's good to hear.

And thanks for the info you provided. I obviously have an interest in some of the answers that can't be posted, but I would also rather not get banned.

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:23 pm
by noleknight16
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.
RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:25 pm
by penguinbrah
noleknight16 wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.
RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section
that was bad man...

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:28 pm
by noleknight16
penguinbrah wrote:
noleknight16 wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.
RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section
that was bad man...
The last passage was the brutal one. I had hope until that one.

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:28 pm
by kickthebcket
penguinbrah wrote:
noleknight16 wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.
RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section
that was bad man...
Really bad. I guessed on each of the last 8 questions of that section. Hate it when dense scientific passages count for so much

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:37 pm
by penguinbrah
kickthebcket wrote:
penguinbrah wrote:
noleknight16 wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.
RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section
that was bad man...
Really bad. I guessed on each of the last 8 questions of that section. Hate it when dense scientific passages count for so much

i guessed on multiple of those questions.. i had to speed read that passage cuz i started it with 5 min left... god. all bad. i might cancel... i bombed my second LG section also which was the third section after the first one was LG(the one i did good on, which is most likely experimental)...

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:39 pm
by noleknight16
penguinbrah wrote: i guessed on multiple of those questions.. i had to speed read that passage cuz i started it with 5 min left... god. all bad. i might cancel... i bombed my second LG section also which was the third section after the first one was LG(the one i did good on, which is most likely experimental)...
If you did bad on the real logic games, you should consider it. Cause the real logic games were pretty tame I thought, and I'm not even a -0 every time kind of tester. Of course, you know what you should do better than I do.

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:41 pm
by 3v3ryth1ng
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.
Fuck yes. Thank you for just saying the essential info.

For anyone who wants to know, the real games had lectures, TV programming, and I forget the other 2, but they were easy.

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:42 pm
by sandiego222
noleknight16 wrote:
penguinbrah wrote: i guessed on multiple of those questions.. i had to speed read that passage cuz i started it with 5 min left... god. all bad. i might cancel... i bombed my second LG section also which was the third section after the first one was LG(the one i did good on, which is most likely experimental)...
If you did bad on the real logic games, you should consider it. Cause the real logic games were pretty tame I thought, and I'm not even a -0 every time kind of tester. Of course, you know what you should do better than I do.

Hah. You keep saying that, but on every practice I've done except one I go -0 on LG. This time around, I had to fill in random bubbles for the last 4 problems of the 4th one (just couldn't wrap my mind around that one, and then panicked)

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:43 pm
by wolf
3v3ryth1ng wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.
Fuck yes. Thank you for just saying the essential info.

For anyone who wants to know, the real games had lectures, TV programming, and I forget the other 2, but they were easy.
also had types of dishes served ... now tell me which LR's were real

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:44 pm
by noleknight16
3v3ryth1ng wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.
Fuck yes. Thank you for just saying the essential info.

For anyone who wants to know, the real games had lectures, TV programming, and I forget the other 2, but they were easy.
I don't know if Fuck yes is the correct response to that. That RC was brutal.

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:46 pm
by 3v3ryth1ng
noleknight16 wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.
RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section
So the experimental can be 5 now.
Worrying about the order, however, is futile. It's different for almost everyone, and there are more than just 2 or 3 test layouts. The only useful thing people can do in this thread is compare general topics. Frankly, once someone can drop some LR topics, not much else needs to be said.

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:47 pm
by bluthbanana
LR1: saint patrick's day carnations

LR2: Dogs related wolves (I think that was in the second...)

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:48 pm
by wolf
bluthbanana wrote:LR1: saint patrick's day carnations

LR2: Dogs related wolves (I think that was in the second...)
exact same as mine

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:49 pm
by 3v3ryth1ng
noleknight16 wrote:
3v3ryth1ng wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.
Fuck yes. Thank you for just saying the essential info.

For anyone who wants to know, the real games had lectures, TV programming, and I forget the other 2, but they were easy.
I don't know if Fuck yes is the correct response to that. That RC was brutal.
I finished it, but I didn't finish the experimental. The only passage that sucked was the one about soil depletion, and it was mostly bad cause I was rushed.

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:50 pm
by wolf
3v3ryth1ng wrote:
noleknight16 wrote:
3v3ryth1ng wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.
Fuck yes. Thank you for just saying the essential info.

For anyone who wants to know, the real games had lectures, TV programming, and I forget the other 2, but they were easy.
I don't know if Fuck yes is the correct response to that. That RC was brutal.
I finished it, but I didn't finish the experimental. The only passage that sucked was the one about soil depletion, and it was mostly bad cause I was rushed.
Posting that violated LSAC rules ..... now Roman Law says I must Blackmail you. Lol

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:52 pm
by 3v3ryth1ng
wolf wrote:
bluthbanana wrote:LR1: saint patrick's day carnations

LR2: Dogs related wolves (I think that was in the second...)
exact same as mine
I'd also like to add that Wolves was a 26 q's, and St Pattys carnations was 25. 100% sure, no doubt about it, put it on my moms life.