DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

penguinbrah
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:20 am

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby penguinbrah » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:12 pm

^^ are we allowed to discuss what doppelganger is saying?

kickthebcket
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:11 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby kickthebcket » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:12 pm

rth887 wrote:I had the LR-LG-LR-LR-RC. I'm hoping the first section was the experimental. I don't know if it was due to it being the first section of an 8:30 test, but it seemed atypical for LR in terms of questions.


+1, that first section seemed too heavy in the science dept for a real LR section

kickthebcket
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:11 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby kickthebcket » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:13 pm

NomNom wrote:I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC

The first LR was DEFINITELY the experimental. The question stems were noticeably different than anything I had seen before and it felt different. That appears to the be the general consensus.



I sure hope you're right!

Cinderella Applicant
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:27 am

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby Cinderella Applicant » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:14 pm

penguinbrah wrote:^^ are we allowed to discuss what doppelganger is saying?


Idk if that's too specific. Is this thread even allowed to exist?

penguinbrah
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:20 am

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby penguinbrah » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:15 pm

Cinderella Applicant wrote:
penguinbrah wrote:^^ are we allowed to discuss what doppelganger is saying?


Idk if that's too specific. Is this thread even allowed to exist?



i dont see why not. to tell you the truth i dont see why the forum has an obligation to LSAC to follow their rules anyway. If LSAC wants to punish people for discussing certain stuff they're more than welcome to go after people's IP Addresses.

User avatar
doppelganger
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:27 am

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby doppelganger » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:16 pm

penguinbrah wrote:^^ are we allowed to discuss what doppelganger is saying?

I'm not asking for answers to questions or giving them, so yes.

bluthbanana
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:03 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby bluthbanana » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:17 pm

I think it's to not give people who take the test later an unfair advantage...which would hurt our curve, no?

rth887
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:01 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby rth887 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:20 pm

LG was "hot"

Cinderella Applicant
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:27 am

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby Cinderella Applicant » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:20 pm

doppelganger wrote:
penguinbrah wrote:^^ are we allowed to discuss what doppelganger is saying?

I'm not asking for answers to questions or giving them, so yes.


Okay, that's good to hear.

And thanks for the info you provided. I obviously have an interest in some of the answers that can't be posted, but I would also rather not get banned.

User avatar
noleknight16
Posts: 943
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby noleknight16 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:23 pm

doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.


RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section

penguinbrah
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:20 am

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby penguinbrah » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:25 pm

noleknight16 wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.


RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section


that was bad man...

User avatar
noleknight16
Posts: 943
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby noleknight16 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:28 pm

penguinbrah wrote:
noleknight16 wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.


RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section


that was bad man...


The last passage was the brutal one. I had hope until that one.

kickthebcket
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:11 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby kickthebcket » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:28 pm

penguinbrah wrote:
noleknight16 wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.


RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section


that was bad man...


Really bad. I guessed on each of the last 8 questions of that section. Hate it when dense scientific passages count for so much

penguinbrah
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:20 am

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby penguinbrah » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:37 pm

kickthebcket wrote:
penguinbrah wrote:
noleknight16 wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.


RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section


that was bad man...


Really bad. I guessed on each of the last 8 questions of that section. Hate it when dense scientific passages count for so much



i guessed on multiple of those questions.. i had to speed read that passage cuz i started it with 5 min left... god. all bad. i might cancel... i bombed my second LG section also which was the third section after the first one was LG(the one i did good on, which is most likely experimental)...

User avatar
noleknight16
Posts: 943
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby noleknight16 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:39 pm

penguinbrah wrote:i guessed on multiple of those questions.. i had to speed read that passage cuz i started it with 5 min left... god. all bad. i might cancel... i bombed my second LG section also which was the third section after the first one was LG(the one i did good on, which is most likely experimental)...


If you did bad on the real logic games, you should consider it. Cause the real logic games were pretty tame I thought, and I'm not even a -0 every time kind of tester. Of course, you know what you should do better than I do.

User avatar
3v3ryth1ng
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:48 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby 3v3ryth1ng » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:41 pm

doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.


Fuck yes. Thank you for just saying the essential info.

For anyone who wants to know, the real games had lectures, TV programming, and I forget the other 2, but they were easy.

sandiego222
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:21 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby sandiego222 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:42 pm

noleknight16 wrote:
penguinbrah wrote:i guessed on multiple of those questions.. i had to speed read that passage cuz i started it with 5 min left... god. all bad. i might cancel... i bombed my second LG section also which was the third section after the first one was LG(the one i did good on, which is most likely experimental)...


If you did bad on the real logic games, you should consider it. Cause the real logic games were pretty tame I thought, and I'm not even a -0 every time kind of tester. Of course, you know what you should do better than I do.



Hah. You keep saying that, but on every practice I've done except one I go -0 on LG. This time around, I had to fill in random bubbles for the last 4 problems of the 4th one (just couldn't wrap my mind around that one, and then panicked)

User avatar
wolf
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:09 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby wolf » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:43 pm

3v3ryth1ng wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.


Fuck yes. Thank you for just saying the essential info.

For anyone who wants to know, the real games had lectures, TV programming, and I forget the other 2, but they were easy.

also had types of dishes served ... now tell me which LR's were real

User avatar
noleknight16
Posts: 943
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby noleknight16 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:44 pm

3v3ryth1ng wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.


Fuck yes. Thank you for just saying the essential info.

For anyone who wants to know, the real games had lectures, TV programming, and I forget the other 2, but they were easy.


I don't know if Fuck yes is the correct response to that. That RC was brutal.

User avatar
3v3ryth1ng
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:48 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby 3v3ryth1ng » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:46 pm

noleknight16 wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.


RC5 it is then. :/ tough, tough section


So the experimental can be 5 now.
Worrying about the order, however, is futile. It's different for almost everyone, and there are more than just 2 or 3 test layouts. The only useful thing people can do in this thread is compare general topics. Frankly, once someone can drop some LR topics, not much else needs to be said.

bluthbanana
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:03 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby bluthbanana » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:47 pm

LR1: saint patrick's day carnations

LR2: Dogs related wolves (I think that was in the second...)

User avatar
wolf
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:09 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby wolf » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:48 pm

bluthbanana wrote:LR1: saint patrick's day carnations

LR2: Dogs related wolves (I think that was in the second...)


exact same as mine

User avatar
3v3ryth1ng
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:48 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby 3v3ryth1ng » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:49 pm

noleknight16 wrote:
3v3ryth1ng wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.


Fuck yes. Thank you for just saying the essential info.

For anyone who wants to know, the real games had lectures, TV programming, and I forget the other 2, but they were easy.


I don't know if Fuck yes is the correct response to that. That RC was brutal.


I finished it, but I didn't finish the experimental. The only passage that sucked was the one about soil depletion, and it was mostly bad cause I was rushed.

User avatar
wolf
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:09 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby wolf » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:50 pm

3v3ryth1ng wrote:
noleknight16 wrote:
3v3ryth1ng wrote:
doppelganger wrote:The real RC had Latina authors passage and blackmail passage.


Fuck yes. Thank you for just saying the essential info.

For anyone who wants to know, the real games had lectures, TV programming, and I forget the other 2, but they were easy.


I don't know if Fuck yes is the correct response to that. That RC was brutal.


I finished it, but I didn't finish the experimental. The only passage that sucked was the one about soil depletion, and it was mostly bad cause I was rushed.


Posting that violated LSAC rules ..... now Roman Law says I must Blackmail you. Lol

User avatar
3v3ryth1ng
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:48 pm

Re: DEC 2011 LSAT EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Postby 3v3ryth1ng » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:52 pm

wolf wrote:
bluthbanana wrote:LR1: saint patrick's day carnations

LR2: Dogs related wolves (I think that was in the second...)


exact same as mine


I'd also like to add that Wolves was a 26 q's, and St Pattys carnations was 25. 100% sure, no doubt about it, put it on my moms life.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beantheshadow, Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests