Hi all, what's the general wisdom regarding number of tests in the following situations:
One test, a cancellation, then a second test (showing decent improvement - hopefully).
A test, a second test showing modest improvement, then a third test showing more modest improvement.
Is one of these far more preferable than the other? If there was a large break (over a year and a half) in between the first test and the second two tests, can that be explained in some sort of letter, helping to mitigate the significance of the first test?
3 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 5:14 am
If you get a 160, then a year and a half later get a 167, then a few months later get a 172...nothing will matter, no explanation will be need. If you go 150, 155, 159...then maybe. If you break 170, your golden. But not, there isn't a huge difference in your above hypotheticals.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests