TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

imjustjoking22
Posts: 461
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:46 am

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby imjustjoking22 » Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:22 am

941law wrote:interesting. I was hoping it was the 1st LR but in all reality I found them all to be equal. Glad I didn't assume it was 1 of the first 2 and let that creep in mentally. I went into the test thinking that the lsac would do whatever the hell they want and I was right.


Found them all equal? Really? I don't think I had more than 5 min left to check tough answers on the first 2 LR sections, and I wouldn't be surprised if I had a full 15 left on the last one...double-checked every one of those suckers. I thought that would be the saving grace of this test for me...wah.

powellshake2
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:40 pm

Re: 4th section experimental???

Postby powellshake2 » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:29 am

3v3ryth1ng wrote:Well I'm now convinced that it's true- the experimental section can now appear 4th, or possibly later. Someone from another thread had a the experimental RC in his 4th section. That's pretty hard to argue with, unless of course he's lying. Thank you all, and good night.




I may be missing the point entirely, but I 100% had those previously mentioned LR questions and I had two RC sections. So what the hell does that mean?

I would not assume that the LR section with the pizza parlor question and cops/computers is experimental. It couldn't have been for me. :|

(Sorry if i'm missing the point/mistaken)

User avatar
zdamico
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:57 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby zdamico » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:12 am

I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous

benito
Posts: 321
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:09 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby benito » Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:05 pm

I'm one of the traditional LSAT infallibity apologetics this thread is referring to and I'm starting to loosen my skepticism. Does anyone that only had one RC section remember any subjects??

benito
Posts: 321
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:09 pm

Re: 4th section experimental???

Postby benito » Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:17 pm

powellshake2 wrote:
3v3ryth1ng wrote:Well I'm now convinced that it's true- the experimental section can now appear 4th, or possibly later. Someone from another thread had a the experimental RC in his 4th section. That's pretty hard to argue with, unless of course he's lying. Thank you all, and good night.




I may be missing the point entirely, but I 100% had those previously mentioned LR questions and I had two RC sections. So what the hell does that mean?

I would not assume that the LR section with the pizza parlor question and cops/computers is experimental. It couldn't have been for me. :|

(Sorry if i'm missing the point/mistaken)


I dont think you're mistaken at all, I think this test is just a blur and people's memories are faulty. You're right that if you had two RC sections all of your LR questions are real.

User avatar
qbt1990
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:50 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby qbt1990 » Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:16 pm

benito wrote:I'm one of the traditional LSAT infallibity apologetics this thread is referring to and I'm starting to loosen my skepticism. Does anyone that only had one RC section remember any subjects??


The real RC section had Dostoyevsky, Mexican proverbs, etc

User avatar
qbt1990
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:50 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby qbt1990 » Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:17 pm

zdamico wrote:I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous


I don't even understand the title? where do lips go? i'm confused

User avatar
crumpetsandtea
Posts: 7156
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby crumpetsandtea » Thu Oct 06, 2011 4:28 pm

qbt1990 wrote:
zdamico wrote:I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous


I don't even understand the title? where do lips go? i'm confused

On the dick, my friend. On the dick.

User avatar
lsatprepguy
Posts: 163
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:04 am

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby lsatprepguy » Thu Oct 06, 2011 4:41 pm

crumpetsandtea wrote:
qbt1990 wrote:
zdamico wrote:I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous


I don't even understand the title? where do lips go? i'm confused

On the dick, my friend. On the dick.


I am on the train, and I just laughed so hard that people got up and moved lolololool

benito
Posts: 321
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:09 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby benito » Thu Oct 06, 2011 6:30 pm

qbt1990 wrote:
benito wrote:I'm one of the traditional LSAT infallibity apologetics this thread is referring to and I'm starting to loosen my skepticism. Does anyone that only had one RC section remember any subjects??


The real RC section had Dostoyevsky, Mexican proverbs, etc



great....thanks

User avatar
happyshapy
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:41 pm

Re: 4th section experimental???

Postby happyshapy » Thu Oct 06, 2011 7:08 pm

powellshake2 wrote:
3v3ryth1ng wrote:Well I'm now convinced that it's true- the experimental section can now appear 4th, or possibly later. Someone from another thread had a the experimental RC in his 4th section. That's pretty hard to argue with, unless of course he's lying. Thank you all, and good night.




I may be missing the point entirely, but I 100% had those previously mentioned LR questions and I had two RC sections. So what the hell does that mean?

I would not assume that the LR section with the pizza parlor question and cops/computers is experimental. It couldn't have been for me. :|

(Sorry if i'm missing the point/mistaken)


i think you might be missing the point. ppl who had LR experimental fourth had the pizza and cops/computer questions in their second LR (3rd section overall). At least I did.

User avatar
3v3ryth1ng
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:48 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby 3v3ryth1ng » Thu Oct 06, 2011 7:15 pm

zdamico wrote:I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous


1) True. It's a "soft" confirmation from a typically reliable source.

2) I wear collared shirts with shiny shoes. I'm mature, ok? Besides, it feels really, really good to get bl... I mean, to be right ;)

User avatar
qbt1990
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:50 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby qbt1990 » Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:01 pm

crumpetsandtea wrote:
qbt1990 wrote:
zdamico wrote:I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous


I don't even understand the title? where do lips go? i'm confused

On the dick, my friend. On the dick.



hahaha wow. yeah I agree, extremely distasteful :/

User avatar
3v3ryth1ng
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:48 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby 3v3ryth1ng » Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:33 am

qbt1990 wrote:
crumpetsandtea wrote:
qbt1990 wrote:
zdamico wrote:I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous


I don't even understand the title? where do lips go? i'm confused

On the dick, my friend. On the dick.



hahaha wow. yeah I agree, extremely distasteful :/


Man, did I commit another faux pas? How do I always find a way to alienate myself? Somehow I managed to do it before I had any friends this time.

User avatar
soj
Posts: 7735
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby soj » Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:40 am

had high hopes after the title. disappointed.

pretty surprised the experimental could be 4th.

User avatar
3v3ryth1ng
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:48 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby 3v3ryth1ng » Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:52 am

soj wrote:had high hopes after the title. disappointed.

pretty surprised the experimental could be 4th.


I think I broke some teeth with my cold, hard, phallus of truth. I think that, for some posters, it was their first time seeing it, so they got scared and went into hiding.

What were you expecting?

User avatar
soj
Posts: 7735
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby soj » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:00 am

more penis, less derp

chill out bro, you got a pretty big chip on your shoulders

User avatar
3v3ryth1ng
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:48 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby 3v3ryth1ng » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:33 am

soj wrote:more penis, less derp

chill out bro, you got a pretty big chip on your shoulders


What's derp? And yes, you're correct, and no it doesn't stop.
Enjoy your weekend everyone!

User avatar
rivermaker
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:16 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby rivermaker » Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:19 am

for people that say section 4 was experimental, what LR question numbers did you have. 25 26 25? or 25 26 26?

User avatar
3v3ryth1ng
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:48 pm

Re: TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D

Postby 3v3ryth1ng » Sat Oct 08, 2011 8:00 am

rivermaker wrote:for people that say section 4 was experimental, what LR question numbers did you have. 25 26 25? or 25 26 26?


At this point, I don't even remember. People were comparing these on the day of the test. Flip to the beginning of all the recent post-LSAT threads and try to find people talking about the subjects. I think I remember one person actually compiled a list of subjects in one post. Some words you'd try searching for are "whales, pizza, apes, mirrors, alzheimers, hot spots" among others.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: batlaw, bearedman8, Bing [Bot], blackmamba8, dontsaywhatyoumean and 8 guests